A Retrospective Case Series of Concomitant Carbapenem and Valproic Acid Use: Are Best Practice Advisories Working?

Background: A Best Practice Advisory (BPA) warns clinicians of an interaction between carbapenems and valproic acid (VPA) that can cause significant declines in VPA levels leading to serious consequences for patients treated for seizure disorder and unknown implications for alternative indications. Objective: The goal of this study was to assess BPA efficacy in avoiding concomitant VPA/carbapenems, and to characterize use of these agents, clinical implications, and potential alternative therapeutic options. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients over the course of 1 year who were concomitantly prescribed a carbapenem and VPA at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT. Data collected included: level of care, duration of concomitant therapy, indications, VPA levels during or surrounding overlap, documentation of the interaction, and therapeutic implications. Results: Carbapenems and VPA were administered to 591 and 625 patients, respectively; the BPA fired 126 times in 24 patients, and 15 patients were initiated on these agents concomitantly. Eight (53%) patients received VPA for seizures. The remaining seven (47%) received VPA for alternative indications. Eight of nine VPA levels were sub-therapeutic during carbapenem therapy and polypharmacy was administered in all patients receiving VPA for non-convulsive indications. Conclusion: Co-prescribing of these drugs was rare; however, the BPA was ineffective in 63% of instances. Reductions in VPA efficacy for any indication should be expected with concomitant carbapenem administration. Antibiotics other than carbapenems should be considered when coverage of multidrug resistant Gram-negative pathogens is required in patients whose VPA treatment cannot be interrupted or switched to a therapeutic alternative.

Impact of a Pharmacist-Managed Procalcitonin Program on COVID-19 Respiratory Tract Infection Outcomes and Health Care Resource Utilization.

Patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often receive empiric antibiotic coverage. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a biomarker with Food and Drug Administration-approved guidance cutoffs for antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections. Herein we describe the implementation and impact of a pharmacist-managed PCT monitoring program in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In this quasi-experimental, single-center, retrospective study of a prospective antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist-managed program, inpatients who were severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction positive were reviewed during weekday working hours and evaluated for appropriateness of antibiotic treatment by utilizing the PCT biomarker. As needed, the infectious diseases pharmacist offered feedback around antibiotic discontinuation in patients with PCT values ≤0.25 ng/mL. Adherence to PCT cutoffs, clinical outcomes, and utilization of health care resources were quantified and compared with a time frame immediately preceding the program's implementation. A total of 772 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were analyzed. The pre-intervention cohort was comprised of 519 patients, and 253 patients were included after program implementation. Antibiotics were prescribed within 72 hours of admission to 232 (44.7%) and 108 (42.7%) patients during the control and intervention phases, respectively. There was no difference in the primary outcome of percentage of patients who received >1 day of antibiotic therapy (23.5% vs 21.7%; P = .849) or in any secondary outcome including hospital length of stay, 30-day readmission rates, or discharge disposition. In a hospital where the majority of COVID-19 patients did not receive empiric antibiotics, the implementation of a pharmacist-managed PCT monitoring program did not significantly decrease antibiotic use or health care resource utilization.

Impact of Order-Set Modifications and Provider Education Following Guideline Updates on Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Use in Patients Admitted With Community Acquired Pneumonia.

Purpose: Following updates to the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) practice guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia in 2019, Hartford HealthCare implemented changes to the community acquired pneumonia (CAP) order-set in August 2020 to reflect criteria for the prescribing of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy. The objective of the study was to evaluate changes in broad-spectrum antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) following these order-set updates with accompanying provider education. Methods: This was a multi-center, quasi-experimental, retrospective study of patients with a diagnosis of CAP from September 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019 (pre-intervention) and September 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020 (post-intervention). Patients were identified using ICD-10 codes (A48.1, J10.00-J18.9) indicating lower respiratory tract infection. Data collected included demographics, labs and vitals, radiographic, microbiological, and antibiotic data. The primary outcome was change in broad-spectrum antibiotic DOT, specifically anti-pseudomonal ß-lactams and anti-MRSA antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included guideline-concordance of initial antibiotics, utilization of an order-set to prescribe antibiotics, and length of stay (LOS). Results: A total of 331 and 352 patients were included in the pre- and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. There were no differences in order-set usage (10% vs 11.3%, P = .642) between the pre- and post-intervention cohort, respectively. The overall duration of broad-spectrum therapy was a median of 2 days (IQR 0-8 days) in the pre-intervention period and 0 days (IQR 0-4 days) in the post-intervention period (P < .001). Patients in whom the order-set was used in the post-intervention period were more likely to have guideline-concordant regimens ([36/40] 90% vs [190/312] 60.9%; P = .003). Hospital LOS was shorter in the post-intervention cohort (4.8 days [2.9-7.2 days] vs 5.3 days [IQR 3.5-8.5 days], P = .002). Conclusion: Implementation of an updated CAP order-set with accompanying provider education was associated with reduced use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Opportunities to improve compliance and thus further increase guideline-concordant therapy require investigation.