Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Periodontol ; 91(4): 533-544, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31473996

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The initiation and progression of periodontitis might involve a local renin-angiotensin system in periodontal tissue. This study hypothesized that Losartan treatment could promote protection to rats submitted to experimental periodontitis (EP) by attenuating alveolar bone loss due to reduction in inflammatory cytokines, better reactive oxidant species regulation and maintenance of the balance between bone formation and resorption factors. METHODS: One hundred and thirty rats were submitted to EP with a silk suture thread (4.0) placed around the lower right first molar for 1, 3, 7, and 14 consecutive days. The study comprised four groups: G1-control without EP; G2-animals with EP treated with water; G3-Losartan-treated animals (treatment started at the same day of EP induction), and G4-animals previously treated with Losartan for 30 days followed by induction of EP and continuity of treatment. RESULTS: G2 rats had greater bone loss volume, increased number, and thickness and decreased separation of trabeculae. On the other hand, G4 animals showed significant improvements in these parameters. Histological analysis revealed that EP favors inflammatory cell infiltration and junctional epithelium, cementum with alveolar bone crest destruction, but animals pretreated with Losartan (G4) did not show these features. Although the G3 animals did not demonstrate the improvements detected in G4, mRNA expression results were similar. In mandibular tissue, EP promoted mRNA increases for ACE, AT1 receptor, and inflammatory mediators as well as decreases for antioxidant enzymes. However, Losartan treatments attenuated these responses in addition to promoting an increase in bone formation markers and transcription factors. CONCLUSION: AT1 receptor modulates EP progression.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Periodontitis , Animals , Antioxidants , Inflammation Mediators , Osteogenesis , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Receptors, Angiotensin
2.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0134601, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26244896

ABSTRACT

The initiation or progression of periodontitis might involve a local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in periodontal tissue. The aim of this study was to further characterize the local RAS in human and rat periodontal tissues between healthy and periodontally-affected tissue. Components of the RAS were investigated using in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo experiments involving both human and Wistar rat periodontium. Although not upregulated when challenged with P. gingivalis-lipopolysaccharide, human gingival and periodontal ligament fibroblasts expressed RAS components. Likewise, healthy and inflamed human gingiva expressed RAS components, some of which were shown to be functional, yet no differences in expression were found between healthy and diseased gingiva. However, in inflamed tissue the immunoreactivity was greater for the AT1R compared to AT2R in fibroblasts. When compared to healthy tissue, ACE activity was increased in human gingiva from volunteers with gingivitis. Human-gingiva homogenates generated Ang II, Ang 1-9 and Ang 1-7 when incubated with precursors. In gingiva homogenates, Ang II formation from Ang I was nearly abolished only when captopril and chymostatin were combined. Ang 1-7 formation was significantly greater when human gingiva homogenates were incubated with chymostatin alone compared to incubation without any inhibitor, only captopril, or captopril and chymostatin. In rat gingiva, RAS components were also found; their expression was not different between healthy and experimentally induced periodontitis (EP) groups. However, renin inhibition (aliskiren) and an AT1R antagonist (losartan) significantly blocked EP-alveolar-bone loss in rats. Collectively, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that a local RAS system is not only present but is also functional in both human and rat periodontal tissue. Furthermore, blocking AT1R and renin can significantly prevent periodontal bone loss induced by EP in rats.


Subject(s)
Periodontitis/immunology , Periodontitis/pathology , Periodontium/immunology , Periodontium/pathology , Renin-Angiotensin System , Adult , Amino Acid Sequence , Angiotensin I/analysis , Angiotensin I/immunology , Angiotensin II/analysis , Angiotensin II/immunology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Female , Gingiva/cytology , Gingiva/immunology , Gingiva/pathology , Humans , Inflammation/immunology , Inflammation/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Peptide Fragments/analysis , Peptide Fragments/immunology , Rats, Wistar , Receptors, Angiotensin/analysis , Receptors, Angiotensin/immunology , Renin/immunology , Young Adult
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22732846

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Lower third molar removal provides a clinical model for studying analgesic drugs. The present study's aim was to compare the clinical efficacy of sublingual ketorolac and sublingual piroxicam in managing pain, trismus and swelling after lower third molar extraction in adult volunteers. STUDY DESIGN: In this double-blinded, randomized, crossover investigation, 47 volunteers received for 4 days ketorolac sublingually (10 mg 4 times daily) and piroxicam sublingually (20 mg once daily) during 2 separate appointments after lower third molar extraction of symmetrically positioned lower third molars. A surgeon evaluated objective parameters (surgery duration, mouth opening, rescue analgesic medication, and facial swelling) and volunteers documented subjective parameters (postoperative pain and global evaluation), comparing postoperative results for a total of 7 days after surgery. The means of the objective and subjective parameters were compared for statistical significance (P < .05). RESULTS: Volunteers reported low pain scores during the postoperative period when treated with either sublingual ketorolac or piroxicam. Also, volunteers ingested similar amounts of analgesic rescue medication (paracetamol) when they received either drug sublingually (P > .05). Additionally, values for mouth openings measured just before surgery and immediately after suture removal 7 days later were similar among volunteers (P > .05), and the type of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) used in this study showed no significant differences between swellings on the second or seventh days after surgery (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Pain, trismus, and swelling after lower third molar extraction, independent of surgical difficulty, were successfully controlled by sublingual ketorolac (10 mg 4 times daily) or sublingual piroxicam (20 mg once daily), and no significant differences were observed between the NSAIDs evaluated.


Subject(s)
Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Edema/drug therapy , Ketorolac/administration & dosage , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Piroxicam/administration & dosage , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Trismus/drug therapy , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Edema/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/surgery , Osteotomy , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome , Trismus/etiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...