Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 2024 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39105476

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To describe the use and the relation to outcome of different ventilation strategies in a contemporary, large, prospective registry of cardiogenic shock patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 657 patients enrolled from March 2020 to November 2023, 198 (30.1%) received oxygen therapy (OT), 96 (14.6%) underwent non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and 363 (55.3%) underwent invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV). Patients in the iMV group were significantly younger compared to those in the NIV and OT groups (63 vs. 69 years, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups regarding cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with SCAI B and C were more frequently treated with OT and NIV compared to iMV (65.1% and 65.4% vs. 42.6%, respectively, p > 0.001), while the opposite trend was observed in SCAI D patients (12% and 12.2% vs. 30.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). All-cause mortality at 24 h did not differ amongst the three groups. The 60-day mortality rates were 40.2% for the iMV group, 26% for the OT group, and 29.3% for the NIV group (p = 0.005), even after excluding patients with cardiac arrest at presentation. In the multivariate analysis including SCAI stages, NIV was not associated with worse mortality compared to iMV (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 0.85-4.56), even in more severe SCAI stages such as D. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to previous studies, we observed a rising trend in the utilization of NIV among cardiogenic shock patients, irrespective of aetiology and SCAI stages. In this clinical scenario, NIV emerges as a safe option for appropriately selected patients.

2.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 11(12): 916-921, 2022 Dec 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36222185

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition due to primary cardiac dysfunction. First-line therapy involves drug administration (including inotropes and/or vasopressors) up to mechanical circulatory support. Tachycardia is a frequent compensatory mechanism in response to hypotension and low cardiac output or a side effect related to inotropic drugs. Ivabradine selectively acts on the IKf channel in the sinoatrial node to reduce sinus heart rate without affecting inotropism. Its use, in small non-randomized series of patients with CS without mechanical circulatory support, was safe and well tolerated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We present the use of ivabradine in six patients with CS undertaking veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and a matched cohort of selected patients with similar features who did not receive ivabradine. Data regarding haemodynamic and echocardiographic monitoring, oxygenation, renal function, mechanical circulatory support, inotropes, and vasopressors doses were collected before (t0), at 12 (t1), 24 (t2), and 48 (t3) h after ivabradine administration. Ivabradine administration led to a significant heart rate reduction of 20.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) -27.2 to -14.4] b.p.m. (<0.01). Echo-derived left ventricular native stroke volume (SV) significantly increased by +7.83 (95% CI 4.74-10.93) mL (P < 0.001) with a parallel reduction of VA-ECMO support [-170 (95% CI -225.05 to -114.95)]. Noradrenaline was down-titrated over the observation period in all patients (P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in heart rate was observed after ivabradine administration. This was associated with a native ventricular SV improvement allowing the reduction of extracorporeal flow support and vasopressors administration.


Subject(s)
Hemodynamics , Shock, Cardiogenic , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/drug therapy , Ivabradine , Heart Rate , Stroke Volume , Vasoconstrictor Agents
3.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 23(11): 373, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39076196

ABSTRACT

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. The goal of resuscitation is often meant as the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). However, ROSC is only one of the steps towards survival. The post-ROSC phase is still a challenging one during which the risk of death is all but averted. Morbidity and mortality are exceedingly high due to cardiovascular and neurologic issues; for this reason, post ROSC care relies on international guidelines, the latest being published on April 2021. Since then, several studies have become available covering a variety of topics of crucial importance for post-resuscitation care such as the interpretation of the post-ROSC ECG, the timing of coronary angiography, the role of complete myocardial revascularization and targeted temperature management. This narrative review focuses on these new evidences, in order to further improve clinical practice, and on the need for a multidisciplinary and integrated system of care.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL