ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of maternal attitudes and other factors associated with infant vaccination status. STUDY DESIGN: Data on reported vaccination status were analyzed from a nationally representative prospective survey of mothers of 2- to 6-month-old infants. Weighted univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted. Latent profile analysis of mothers reporting nonimmunized infants identified distinct groups, RESULTS: Of 3268 mothers, 2820 (weighted 86.2%), 311 (9.1%), and 137 (4.7%), respectively, reported their infant had received all, some, or no recommended vaccinations for age. Younger infants and infants with younger mothers were more likely to have received no vaccinations. Mothers with neutral and negative attitudes toward vaccination were >3 (aOR 3.66, 95% CI 1.80-7.46) and 43 times (aOR 43.23, 95% CI 20.28-92.16), respectively, more likely than mothers with positive attitudes to report their infants had received no vaccinations. Two subgroups of mothers reporting that their infants had received no vaccinations were identified: group A (52.5%) had less than positive attitudes and less than positive subjective norms about vaccination (ie, perceived social pressure from others); group B (47.5%) had positive attitudes and positive subjective norms. Group A mothers were more likely to be white (76.1% vs 48.3%, P?=?.002), more educated (43.5% vs 35.4% college or higher, P?=?.02), and to exclusively breastfeed (74.9% vs. 27.3%, P?.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although access barriers can result in nonvaccination, less than positive maternal attitude toward vaccination was the strongest predictor. Strategies to improve vaccination rates must focus on both improved access and better understanding of factors underlying maternal attitudes.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mothers , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Appointments and Schedules , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Infant , Medically Uninsured , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transportation , United States , Vaccination Refusal , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between maternal birth country and adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics safe sleep recommendations in a national sample of Hispanic mothers, given that data assessing the heterogeneity of infant care practices among Hispanics are lacking. STUDY DESIGN: We used a stratified, 2-stage, clustered design to obtain a nationally representative sample of mothers from 32 US intrapartum hospitals. A total of 907 completed follow-up surveys (administered 2-6 months postpartum) were received from mothers who self-identified as Hispanic/Latina, forming our sample, which we divided into 4 subpopulations by birth country (US, Mexico, Central/South America, and Caribbean). Prevalence estimates and aORs were determined for infant sleep position, location, breastfeeding, and maternal smoking. RESULTS: When compared with US-born mothers, we found that mothers born in the Caribbean (aOR 4.56) and Central/South America (aOR 2.68) were significantly more likely to room share without bed sharing. Caribbean-born mothers were significantly less likely to place infants to sleep supine (aOR 0.41). Mothers born in Mexico (aOR 1.67) and Central/South America (aOR 2.57) were significantly more likely to exclusively breastfeed; Caribbean-born mothers (aOR 0.13) were significantly less likely to do so. Foreign-born mothers were significantly less likely to smoke before and during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Among US Hispanics, adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics safe sleep recommendations varies widely by maternal birth country. These data illustrate the importance of examining behavioral heterogeneity among ethnic groups and have potential relevance for developing targeted interventions for safe infant sleep.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Infant Care/methods , Sleep/physiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Sudden Infant Death/prevention & control , Adult , Breast Feeding/trends , Caribbean Region/ethnology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/trends , Infant, Newborn , Male , Maternal Behavior/ethnology , Mexico/ethnology , Mother-Child Relations , Pregnancy , Prone Position , Residence Characteristics , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Smoking/adverse effects , South America/ethnology , Sudden Infant Death/ethnology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether infants at sleep in the prone side positions are at higher risk for an extreme cardiorespiratory event compared with infants at sleep in the supine position. STUDY DESIGN: We used a case-control study to compare sleep position, determined with an accelerometer, in 116 infants during an extreme cardiorespiratory event with that in 231 matched control subjects (2 per case) who did not experience any extreme events during monitoring. RESULTS: From calculation of adjusted ORs and 95% CIs, infants placed in the prone or side position were no more likely to experience an extreme cardiorespiratory event compared with infants at sleep in the supine position. We used conditional logistic regression to account for the matched design of the study and to adjust for potential confounders or effect-modifiers. CONCLUSION: These findings, coupled with our earlier observation that the peak incidence of severe cardiorespiratory events occurred before the peak incidence of sudden infant death syndrome, strongly suggest that the supine sleeping position decreases the risk of sudden infant death syndrome by mechanisms other than by decreasing extreme cardiorespiratory events detected by monitoring.
Subject(s)
Apnea/epidemiology , Bradycardia/epidemiology , Prone Position , Sleep , Supine Position , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with infant sleep location. STUDY DESIGN: Demographic information and infant care practices were assessed for 708 mothers of infants ages 0 to 8 months at Women, Infants and Children centers. Generalized linear latent mixed models were constructed for the outcome, sleeping arrangement last night (room-sharing without bed-sharing versus bed-sharing, and room-sharing without bed-sharing versus sleeping in separate rooms). RESULTS: Two-thirds of the mothers were African-American. A total of 48.6% mothers room-shared without bed-sharing, 32.5% bed-shared, and 18.9% slept in separate rooms. Compared with infants who slept in separate rooms, infants who room-shared without bed-sharing were more likely to be Hispanic (odds ratio [OR], 2.58, 95% CI 1.11-5.98) and younger (3.66- and 1.74-times more likely for infants 0-1 month old and 2-3 months old, respectively, as compared with older infants). Compared with infants who bed-shared, infants who room-shared without bed-sharing were more likely to be 0 to 1 month old (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.05-2.35) and less likely to be African-American (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.70) or have a teenage mother (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of mothers and infants bed-share, despite increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The factors associated with bed-sharing are also associated with SIDS, likely rendering infants with these characteristics at high risk for SIDS.