Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bioresour Technol ; 119: 373-83, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22750748

ABSTRACT

The prokaryotic diversity of an anaerobic reactor for the treatment of municipal solid waste was investigated over the course of 2 years with the use of 16S rDNA-targeted molecular approaches. The fermentative Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes predominated, and Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Tenericutes and the candidate division WWE1 were also identified. Methane production was dominated by the hydrogenotrophic Methanomicrobiales (Methanoculleus sp.) and their syntrophic association with acetate-utilizing and propionate-oxidizing bacteria. qPCR demonstrated the predominance of the hydrogenotrophic over aceticlastic Methanosarcinaceae (Methanosarcina sp. and Methanimicrococcus sp.), and Methanosaetaceae (Methanosaeta sp.) were measured in low numbers in the reactor. According to the FISH and CARD-FISH analyses, Bacteria and Archaea accounted for 85% and 15% of the cells, respectively. Different cell counts for these domains were obtained by qPCR versus FISH analyses. The use of several molecular tools increases our knowledge of the prokaryotic community dynamics from start-up to steady-state conditions in a full-scale MSW reactor.


Subject(s)
Archaea/classification , Archaea/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bioreactors/microbiology , Refuse Disposal/instrumentation , Sewage/microbiology , Cities
2.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 84(4): 777-89, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19551378

ABSTRACT

The prokaryotic diversity associated with organic household waste (OHW), leachate (start-up inoculum), and mesophilic anaerobic digestion processes in the degradation of OHW for 44 and 90 days was investigated using a culture-independent approach. Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA and mcrA gene clone libraries were constructed from community DNA preparations. Bacterial clones were affiliated with 13 phyla, of which Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were represented in all libraries, whereas Actinobacteria, Thermotogae, Lentisphaerae, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Synergistetes, Spirochaetes, Deferribacteres, and Deinococcus-Thermus were exclusively identified in a single library. Within the Archaea domain, the Euryarchaeota phylum was the only one represented. Corresponding sequences were associated with the following orders of hydrogenotrophic methanogens: Methanomicrobiales (Methanoculleus genus) and Methanobacteriales (Methanosphaera and Methanobacterium genera). One archaeal clone was not affiliated with any order and may represent a novel taxon. Diversity indices showed greater diversity of Bacteria when compared to methanogenic Archaea.


Subject(s)
Archaea/classification , Bacteria/classification , Biodiversity , Bioreactors/microbiology , Family Characteristics , Medical Waste Disposal/methods , Archaea/genetics , Archaea/isolation & purification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Cluster Analysis , DNA, Archaeal/chemistry , DNA, Archaeal/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Genes, rRNA , Molecular Sequence Data , Oxidoreductases/genetics , Phylogeny , RNA, Archaeal/genetics , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...