[Standards, options and recommendations: Good clinical practice in the dietetic management of cancer patients: hospital catering]. / Standards, options et recommandations: Bonnes practiques de diététique en cancérologie: la prestation alimentaire.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, involves a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, some French public university and general hospitals and private Clinics and medical scientific societies. Its main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review followed by a critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts to produce the draft guidelines which are then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for hospital catering for cancer patient using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: Data were identified by a literature search of Medline and the reference lists of experts in the groups. After the guidelines were drafted, they were validated by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1) While taking into consideration the specific needs of cancer patients, the dietician is responsible for the hygiene, the sanitary quality of alimentation, the equilibrium and nutritional quality of the hospital catering. 2) Ordering and distribution of meals, and clearing up afterwards contribute to the quality of hospital catering and the personnel who do this should have time and be willing to listen to the patients. 3) The ordering of meals should be adapted to individual patient's requirements and must take into account the patient's medication. 4) The method of transporting the food chosen by the institution (cold or warm method) should be respected. The personnel responsible should receive regular and specific training to use the method correctly. 5) The intake of patients with nutritional follow-up should be reliably and reproducibly evaluated by the personnel after every meal. 6) Patient satisfaction should be assessed once a year and the results of this assessment used to improve the quality of hospital catering. 7) The dietician is the interface between the accounts department, the medical wards, the hospital catering department and the patients.

[Good clinical practice in the dietetic management of cancer patients]. / Bonnes pratiques pour la prise en charge diététique en cancérologie: la consultation.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCL CC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feed-back from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for the dietetic consultation for cancer patient. METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search wing Medline and the expert groups personal reference lists. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 74 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the referral of cancer patients for dietary advice are: I) in oncology, there are 3 types of dietetic consultation: diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic; 2) the following cancer patients must have a dietetic consultation: i) those with, or at risk of malnutrition, ii) those without malnutrition but in need of counseling and iii) those at risk of treatment-related nutritional side effects; 3) a nutritional assessment is standard at the time of the first dietetic consultation. Patients must be given individualized and written advice; 4) the dietetic opinion and advice should be brought to the attention of medical staff to facilitate a multidisciplinary approach to cancer treatment; 5) patient's relatives should be involved in the dietetic management; 6) the efficacy of dietetic advice can be assessed by monitoring weight, gastrointestinal signs and patient satisfaction.

Energy expenditure during allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation.

Resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured by indirect calorimetry during allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation in order to evaluate the evolution in allogeneic and autologous recipient patients. REE values obtained with indirect calorimetry and compared with values using the Harris-Benedict formula were different. Evolution of REE during aplasia were significantly different in autologous and allogeneic recipients with an increase 11.5 ' 10.8 cent for autologous and a decrease of - 7.3 ' 8.9 cent in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) patients. There were no differences in nutritional status and REE before BMT, at discharge and 1 month after discharge between the two groups but all patients had inflicted damage on their nutritional status at discharge from hospital after BMT. However, these patients differed because of the decrease in oral nutritional intake and an increase in the length of aplasia and hospital stay in allogeneic patients. Currently, there is no proof that recommendations for nutritional interventions or results of nutritional investigations in allogeneic BMT can be extrapolated in autologous patients. Harris-Benedict formula does not estimate the energy expenditure of patients submitted to massive chemotherapy and BMT with enough precision because of the great differences in individuals.