Pressure Injuries Due to Personal Protective Equipment in COVID-19 Critical Care Units.

BACKGROUND: Caring for patients with COVID-19 requires wearing a full set of personal protective equipment (PPE) to avoid contamination. Personal discomfort has been associated with use of PPE, and anecdotal reports describe pressure injuries related to wearing PPE. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the occurrence of device-related pressure injuries due to wearing PPE among Italian nurses caring for patients with COVID-19 in critical care settings. METHODS: This descriptive study used an online survey investigating both the demographic characteristics of respondents and complications related to wearing PPE, including the development of pressure injuries. RESULTS: A total of 266 nurses throughout Italy completed the survey; 32% of respondents were men. Nurses' median age was 36 years (range 22-59 years), and the median time spent working in their current clinical setting (an intensive care or high-dependency unit) was 3 years (range 0-32 years). Personal protective equipment was worn for a median duration of 5 hours (range 2-12 hours). While wearing PPE, 92.8% of nurses experienced pain and 77.1% developed device-related pressure injuries, mainly on the nose, ears, and forehead. Pain was more frequent among nurses with such injuries. Transparent dressings, emollient cream, and no dressing were associated with development of device-related pressure injury. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure injuries related to PPE represent an important adverse effect for nurses caring for patients with COVID-19. This topic deserves study to determine adequate solutions for preventing and treating such injuries and their potential influence on nurses' work tolerance.

Nursing Activity Score for estimating nursing care need in intensive care units: findings from a face and content validity study.

AIM: To re-evaluate the face and content validity of the Nursing Activity Score currently adopted in evaluating activities that best describe workloads in intensive care units and their weight in describing average nursing time consumption. BACKGROUND: The Nursing Activity Score calculates the amount of nursing time that each patient will require over the next 24 hours. It has been widely used around the world since its first validation in 2003. However, no re-evaluation of its validity with regard to the advancements achieved in intensive care units nursing care has been documented to date. METHOD: A research project was undertaken from 2012 to 2015, aimed at critically evaluating and validating this tool in the current context of Italian intensive care units nursing care. The 23 items were translated forward and backward into the Italian language, then a panel of 10 experts in critical care evaluated the face validity. Content validity was evaluated through focus groups involving seven critical care expert registered nurses. FINDINGS: The Nursing Activity Score instrument has been considered as not fully adequate to measure current intensive care units nursing activities and their weightings have been considered not fully adequate to score average nursing time consumption. From the content validity process, lack of adequacy has emerged with respect to the concept of nursing care underpinning the tool, the interventions included, its capability to predict the nursing resources needed, advancements achieved in intensive care units nurses' roles and competences, and the contextual factors that may influence consumption of nursing time. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the Nursing Activity Score tool both conceptually and in its structure, in view of the innovations that have occurred in the context of intensive care units, is necessary to continue to have a common tool to help clinicians and managers to capture accurately and compare nursing care required by patients in critical care settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: There is a need to revise the Nursing Activity Score tool, enabling its use in estimating nursing workloads in current Italian intensive care units practice. A taskforce of clinical nurses and nursing managers, capable of protecting the valuable original Nursing Activity Score project and to advance its further development is recommended.

Delirium among critically ill adults: evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Italian 'Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit'.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU), a clinical assessment tool to detect delirium among Intensive Care Unit patients. DESIGN: Validation study. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: Fifty-seven patients admitted to three medical and surgical Intensive Care Units were recruited. During the study interval two trained examiners performed independent delirium assessment by the CAM-ICU for a maximum of four times per patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the tool, which were measured using Cohen's κ and Cronbach's α coefficients respectively. FINDINGS: Seventy-two paired evaluations were collected. The 35% of the studied cohort tested positive for delirium. The Italian version of the CAM-ICU demonstrated a substantial interrater reliability (κ=0.76, p<0.0001) and a very good internal consistency (α=0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.91). CONCLUSION: The Italian CAM-ICU was found to be a viable instrument by which to approach a standardised monitoring of delirium among Italian speaking ICU patients. The use of such tools may facilitate ICU physicians and nurses in detecting delirium, thus improving both quality and safety of care.

[The management of insulin administration: systematic review and recommendations]. / La gestione della somministrazione di insulina: revisione sistematica della letteratura e raccomandazioni.

AIMS: In spite of the large prevalence and increasing incidence of diabetes, recommendations on how to correctly administer the insulin are lacking. METHODS; A systematic literature review was performed starting from a list of clinical questions collected from patients, clinical experts (doctors and nurses) and others involved in diabetic patients care. The main databases were searched with the following key-words: Insulin/administration and dosage[Mesh]; "Injections, Subcutaneous/instrumentation"[Mesh]; "Injections, Subcutaneous/methods"[Mesh]; insulin administration modalities [All Fields]; insulin administration technique [All Fields]; insulin adsorption[All Fields]; Patient education as a topic/methods [Mesh]. The articles were independently analyzed by three authors and discrepancies discussed. A list of recommendations was produced weighting the evidences according to the Italian National Program for Guidelines method. RESULTS: Over 94 eligible articles, 71 were included. Recommendations for the following areas were produced: self management and education; tools and methods for insulin administration; injection sites; injection techniques; prevention and management of complications; insulin storage; management of IV infusions. Most recommendations are of level II (a single RCT with adequate design) or III (cohort non randomized studies with concurrent or historical controls). CONCLUSIONS: Although several recommendations were identified (e.g., the importance of rotation of injection sites, the criteria for choosing the right needle and injection site according to the type of insulin and speed of absorbtion), several questions are still unanswered and would warrant further and more specific studies.