Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448330

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The study assessed the direct medical costs of the cochlear implantation pathway from the healthcare payer's perspective, in children with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss, from diagnosis to 3 years' follow-up after first implantation. We also compared costs between two populations: congenital and progressive deafness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective costs analysis was performed for 56 children who received a cochlear implant in one French pediatric ENT center. The children had severe to profound hearing loss, and were implanted before the age of 10 years. We calculated direct medical costs in 3 phases: diagnosis to pre-implantation assessment, surgical and hospital management of implantation, and 3 years' follow-up. RESULTS: Mean costs were €64,675 (range, €38,709-113,954) per child from diagnosis to 3 years after first implantation. Mean costs in congenital deafness detected on neonatal screening and on progressive deafness were respectively €65,420 and €63,930 (P=0.7). CONCLUSION: The global cost was €64,675 per child from diagnosis to 3 years after first implantation. There was no difference in cost according to congenital versus progressive hearing loss.

2.
Med Mal Infect ; 42(11): 553-60, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23026269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In France, around 50,000 people were unaware of their HIV positivity at the end of 2008. The latest guidelines recommend routine screening of all adults. Family physicians have been identified as key persons for this new policy. Rapid HIV tests (RHT) have been proposed as an alternative to conventional blood tests. OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed the feasibility and acceptability of RHT test based screening in French community practice. METHOD: We made a prospective interventional study of the BioMerieux VIKIA(®) HIV 1/2 RHT among French family physicians. Data on the RHT was posted in the physician's waiting room. RESULTS: Sixty-two French physicians, mostly family practitioners, included 383 patients with a mean age of 36.2 years, from June to October 2010. Twenty-two percent (83) of these patients had never been tested for HIV. The RHT was proposed and 382 tests were accepted and performed (acceptability rate of 99.7%). Sixty-five percent of the tests were made on the patient's request. The tested population represented 1.5% of consulting patients during the study period (feasibility rate). Patients were quite satisfied but physicians less so. Test steps and capillary blood sampling were the main source of difficulty mentioned. At the end of the study, 59% of physicians were ready to continue using RHT in their daily practice. CONCLUSION: Routine RHT screening in community practice is feasible and well accepted by patients. It was the first screening test for 22% of our patients. Its feasibility was limited by capillary blood sampling technique and time constraints during consultation.


Subject(s)
AIDS Serodiagnosis/methods , Attitude of Health Personnel , Chromatography, Affinity/methods , Mass Screening/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Physicians, Family/psychology , AIDS Serodiagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Blood Specimen Collection/methods , Blood Specimen Collection/psychology , Capillaries , Chromatography, Affinity/statistics & numerical data , Feasibility Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , HIV Seropositivity/diagnosis , HIV Seropositivity/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Risk-Taking , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
J Immunol Methods ; 256(1-2): 47-53, 2001 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11516754

ABSTRACT

Knowledge of the genetic background of patients with inflammatory arthritis may be useful for disease management. The main markers are the HLA-DR-associated Shared Epitope (SE) for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and HLA-B27 for ankylosing spondylitis. We have developed a simple molecular biology-based test to provide this essential information. HLA targets are amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), then simultaneously analyzed using 16 individual hybridization reactions in two 8-well ELISA strips with colorimetric detection. Concordance was evaluated using a cohort of RA patients with known genotype. Using this new assay, 100% concordance was observed with conventional genotyping in RA patients both for HLA-DR SE and B27 genotypes. Seventy-three percent of the patients with destructive RA had at least one susceptible allele within SE, compared to 38% of those patients with non-destructive disease. This new assay, which requires minute amount of blood, could be used to determine the genetic background of inflammatory arthritis, particularly in non-specialized settings and for large-scale clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Arthritis/genetics , HLA-B27 Antigen/genetics , HLA-DR Antigens/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alleles , Arthritis/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Epitopes/genetics , Female , Genetic Markers , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , HLA-DR Antigens/immunology , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
5.
Cancer Radiother ; 4(4): 294-307, 2000.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10994394

ABSTRACT

The French Radiotherapy-Oncology Society (SFRO) and the National Trade of Radiotherapists-Oncologists (SNRO) elaborated and published a patient information booklet on radiotherapy, in 1999. This present study appraises the pertinence of the form and substance of this booklet one year after its release. Eight radiotherapy centers participated in this research which evaluated 162 patients at treatment initiation. The conclusions of this study demonstrated the importance of clearly informing patients of their disease, treatment, and the secondary effects of treatment. It is essential to emphasize that 97% of the patients declared that an information booklet is a real necessity, and that the one provided by the SFRO responds to the majority of their concerns. Obtaining technical and practical knowledge resulted in a reassurance about their treatment. The most revealing result is that 87% requested direct communication about their illness, and that cancer be named by this word and not other, evasive terms. Seventy-two percent of the patients requested more information about their cancer, different treatment options, and quality of life issues in an attempt to psychologically prepare themselves to face an illness for which they have little control. Patients refuse to be passive, and claim the right to become 'partners' of the medical teams, concerning their treatment and recovery.


Subject(s)
Pamphlets , Patient Education as Topic , Radiation Oncology , Radiotherapy , Data Collection , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Patient Satisfaction , Radiotherapy/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...