Inflammatory Response Associated with West Nile Neuroinvasive Disease: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: West Nile virus (WNV) infection is a seasonal arbovirosis with the potential to cause severe neurological disease. Outcomes of the infection from WNV depend on viral factors (e.g., lineage) and host-intrinsic factors (e.g., age, sex, immunocompromising conditions). Immunity is essential to control the infection but may also prove detrimental to the host. Indeed, the persistence of high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines is associated with the development of blood-brain barrier (BBB) damage. Due to the importance of the inflammatory processes in the development of West Nile neuroinvasive disease (WNND), we reviewed the available literature on the subject. METHODS: According to the 2020 updated PRISMA guidelines, all peer-reviewed articles regarding the inflammatory response associated with WNND were included. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six articles were included in the data analysis and sorted into three groups (in vitro on-cell cultures, in vivo in animals, and in humans). The main cytokines found to be increased during WNND were IL-6 and TNF-α. We highlighted the generally small quantity and heterogeneity of information about the inflammatory patterns associated with WNND. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to understand the pathogenesis of WNND and to investigate the extent and the way the host inflammatory response either helps in controlling the infection or in worsening the outcomes. This might prove useful both for the development of target therapies and for the development of molecular markers allowing early identification of patients displaying an inflammatory response that puts them at a higher risk of developing neuroinvasive disease and who might thus benefit from early antiviral therapies.

Good efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in a real-world scenario.

BACKGROUND: Data on vedolizumab (VDZ) use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are still limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of VDZ in a real-life clinical scenario. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of all consecutive IBD patients who started VDZ from September 2016 to December 2018 at our IBD Unit of the University Hospital of Padua and strictly followed them for 1 year. Clinical benefit (rate of clinical steroid-free remission plus clinical response), endoscopic and histological responses were evaluated over 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients who started VDZ for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were included in the main analysis (69 CD patients, 48 UC patients). We obtained a clinical benefit in 68.1%, 68.1% and 59.4% of CD patients and in 68.7%, 54.2% and 54.1% of UC patients after induction, and at 30 weeks and 52 weeks, respectively. After 1 year, endoscopy response was observed in 47% of CD and 38.2% of UC patients, while the histological response was 19.6% and 23.5%, respectively. Finally, we found that 20.5% of patients needed treatment optimization, with 33.3% of them failing to respond despite this action. No deaths or serious adverse events requiring hospitalization were observed. The main cause of VDZ interruption was drug inefficacy. During the study, two patients developed new spondylarthritis, and two had a worsening of pre-existing arthralgia. CONCLUSION: Vedolizumab resulted in being effective and safe in CD as well as in UC patients.