ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim was to compare the efficacy of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) injections and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/Ha) injections for the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children. MATERIAL: This retrospective cohort study included 189 young patients who had endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux from January 2012 to December 2019 in our center. Among them, 101 had PCC injections and 88 had Dx/Ha injections. Indications for treatment were vesicoureteral reflux with breakthrough urinary tract infection or vesicoureteral reflux with renal scarring on dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan. Endoscopic injection was performed under the ureteral meatus. Early complications, recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux after endoscopic injection, ureteral obstruction and reintervention were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: Endoscopic treatment was successful in 90.1% of patients who had PPC injection and in 82% of patients who had Dx/Ha injection. Four patients presented a chronic ureteral obstruction after PPC injection, one with a complete loss of function of the dilated kidney. One patient in the Dx/Ha group presented a postoperative ureteral dilatation after 2 injections. CONCLUSION: Despite a similar success rate after PPC and Dx/Ha injections for endoscopic treatment of VUR, there may be a greater risk of postoperative ureteral obstruction after PPC injections. The benefit of using PPC to prevent febrile UTI and renal scarring in children with low-grade VUR does not seem to outweigh the risk of chronic ureteral obstruction.
Subject(s)
Dextrans , Hyaluronic Acid , Ureteral Obstruction , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux , Humans , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Female , Male , Dextrans/therapeutic use , Dextrans/administration & dosage , Dextrans/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Treatment Outcome , Infant , Acrylic Resins/therapeutic use , Acrylic Resins/administration & dosage , Child , Injections , Cohort Studies , Ureteroscopy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results and complications of open inguinal varicocelectomy, including vein ligation, intraoperative venography, and antegrade sclerotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four children were treated between 2000 and 2009 for idiopathic varicocele. Fifty children were examined 6 months after surgery. In 2010, 22 patients were recalled for testicular ultrasound scans (US) to evaluate the medium-term results of the technique. RESULTS: The mean age of the children was 12.8 years at first consultation. Of the 50 cases, 35 children were asymptomatic, 13 experienced pain, 3 suffered from discomfort, and 1 had testicular asymmetry. Thirteen children had delayed left testicular growth compared with the right testis. The mean age at surgery was 13.3 years, and follow-up duration was 8.3 months ± 13.9. Thirty-eight patients achieved good results postsurgery; there was varicocele recurrence in 3, testicular hypotrophy in 7, and complete testicular atrophy in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: Naked eye inguinal surgical ligation does not appear to be safe enough to treat young adolescents, with the theoretical risk of a decrease in fertility in the future. In teams which are untrained in microsurgical or laparoscopic varicocelectomy, we suggest referring adolescent patients to a radiologist for embolization.
Subject(s)
Inguinal Canal , Sclerotherapy/methods , Testis/pathology , Varicocele/surgery , Adolescent , Follow-Up Studies , Groin/surgery , Humans , Ligation , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sclerotherapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods , Varicocele/diagnostic imaging , Varicocele/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We report the first case description of surgical aortic valve replacement after percutaneous valve implantation. METHODS: An 87-year-old man with severe aortic stenosis who was rejected for surgical intervention underwent percutaneous valve implantation through a retrograde femoral approach. The procedure was complicated by cardiogenic shock caused by severe aortic insufficiency, leading to emergency surgical aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: The operative findings revealed the presence of commissural paravalvular leaks and centrally malapposed leaflets. Surgical replacement was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day 30, despite a challenging postoperative course. His follow-up at 1 year has been uneventful. This case illustrates that overdilatation of the stent is not recommended because it might worsen central aortic insufficiency. Moreover, the transapical route should be considered when the appropriately sized prosthesis is unable to be inserted because of inappropriate vascular access. However, despite an initial "prohibitive" surgical risk, surgical aortic valvular replacement after percutaneous valve implantation could be easily performed. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous heart valve implantation, which provides a larger surface area than balloon valvotomy, can be offered to patients with cardiogenic shock and severe comorbidities to improve their hemodynamic state and reduce their surgical risk.
