Subtraction CTA: An Alternative Imaging Option for the Follow-Up of Flow-Diverter-Treated Aneurysms?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This was a pilot study to explore the diagnostic accuracy and safety of subtraction CTA combined with a single-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm (SEMAR) compared to DSA for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm occlusion after flow diverter treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients treated with a flow diverter for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm between November 2015 and November 2016. The patient cohort comprised 2 groups: those who underwent follow-up imaging 1 month after flow-diverter treatment and those with a known residual intracranial aneurysm after flow diverter treatment who underwent imaging at regular follow-ups. Full-brain subtraction CTA was performed on a 320-detector row CT system. A low-dose non-enhanced volume acquisition was followed by a contrast-enhanced volume CTA. Iterative and noise-reduction filters, SEMAR, and SURESubtraction algorithms were applied. DSA was performed on a flat panel C-arm angiography system. Standard posteroanterior, lateral, 3D, and detailed 2D acquisitions were performed. Imaging was independently scored by 2 clinicians. Aneurysm occlusion (Raymond scale) was our primary outcome parameter. RESULTS: Thirteen intracranial aneurysms were evaluated with subtraction CTA and DSA. Nine aneurysm remnants were demonstrated by both subtraction CTA and DSA. The sensitivity and specificity of subtraction CTA for the detection of aneurysm occlusion were 100% (95% CI, 82.41%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 67.55%-100%), respectively. Agreement between readers was perfect (κ = 1.0). The smallest neck remnant detected on subtraction CTA was 1.2 mm. No complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Subtraction CTA with single-electron metal artifact reduction is effective in the reduction of metal artifacts of flow diverters and might therefore be a viable alternative in the assessment of intracranial aneurysm occlusion after flow diverter treatment.

[Inhaled anesthesia through a device for noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure ventilation for upper digestive endoscopy in pediatric patients]. / Anestesia inhalatoria mediante un dispositivo de ventilación no invasiva tipo "CPAP sin respirador" para endoscopia digestiva alta en pacientes pediátricos.

OBJECTIVE: The demand for sedation for pediatric diagnostic procedures performed outside operating rooms has increased considerably, but the ideal method to choose has been the subject of debate. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of using a device for continuous positive airway pressure, connected to a Mapleson D circuit and a nasopharyngeal tube as the interface, in order to ventilate and administer sevoflurane for upper digestive tract endoscopy in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study of children undergoing upper digestive tract endoscopy. We recorded epidemiologic variables, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and procedure-related adverse events before, during and 10 minutes after the procedure. Time spent in the recovery room was also recorded. The endoscopist asked the patients about their level of satisfaction and whether they had noticed any irritating smell or gas smell. RESULTS: Data was collected on 29 patients (17 boys, 12 girls) with a mean (SD) age of 4.2 (3.9) years. The mean duration of endoscopy was 15 (7) minutes. Arterial oxygen saturation below 92% during the procedure did not occur and the endoscopic exploration was completed satisfactorily with this technique in 28 patients (96%). All were discharged from the recovery room within 30 minutes. The endoscopist reported that the technique was considered satisfactory in all cases, although 2 children noted an anesthetic "gas" smell. CONCLUSIONS: A modified Mapleson D circuit and nasopharyngeal tube can be used effectively as an interface for noninvasive ventilation and administration of sevoflurane during upper digestive endoscopy in pediatric patients.

An individualized pre-operative blood saving protocol can increase pre-operative haemoglobin levels and reduce the need for transfusion in elective total hip or knee arthroplasty.

We have prospectively evaluated the efficacy of an individualized pre-operative blood saving protocol in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The primary aim was to obtain a pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb) level of > or =14 g dL(-1). A reduction in requirements for allogeneic transfusion was considered the second aim. Several strategies are available for increasing pre-operative Hb levels and reducing red blood cell (RBC) transfusions following THA or TKA, but the success of these programmes depends on selecting the most appropriate treatment for each patient. Three hundred and five patients with an indication of elective THA or TKA were individually assigned to the following strategies according to Hb and ferritin levels and medical conditions: (a) no pre-operative intervention, (b) oral iron therapy, (c) intravenous (i.v.) iron therapy, (d) recombinant human erythropoietin alpha with i.v. iron and (e) pre-operative autologous donation (PAD) plus oral iron. Eighty-two percent of the patients reached a pre-operative Hb level of > or =14 g dL(-1) compared with 62% of patients with Hb levels of > or =14 g dL(-1) at the baseline visit. Treatment with PAD showed a significant reduction in the pre-operative Hb levels. The rate of RBC transfusion was 18.8% compared with 31.5% of matched historic group (P < 0.001). In conclusion, all patients scheduled to undergo THA or TKA should be candidates for an individualized pre-operative blood salvage programme.

Tubes for pretransfusion testing should be collected by blood bank staff and hand labelled until the implementation of new technology for improved sample labelling. Results of a prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The greatest risk in transfusion medicine is actually human error, resulting in the use of the incorrect blood component. The aim of our study was to identify and evaluate the risk factors involved in the collection and labelling of pretransfusion blood samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 6446 samples submitted to the blood bank for pretransfusion testing. Inappropriate samples were classified as 'mislabelled' or 'miscollected'. After 4 months of study, an educational approach was taken. RESULTS: The frequency of inappropriately labelled samples was 6.45%. Such samples were associated with the use of addressograph labels (vs. hand-written labels) [23.4% vs. 1.4%, P < 0.0001], collection by clinical staff (vs. blood bank staff) [8.8% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.001] and emergency situations (vs. routine sampling) [10.1% vs. 6.1%, P = 0.005]. Following educational intervention, the percentage of inappropriately labelled samples decreased from 7.3% (pre-educational) to 5.8% (post-educational), P = 0.005. CONCLUSION: Ongoing monitoring and analysis of labelling and collection should be mandatory in order to improve the safety of transfusion.