Acceptability and impact on spasticity of a single session of upper extremity vibration in individuals with tetraplegia.

STUDY DESIGN: Pre-post design; before and after vibration intervention. OBJECTIVES: To explore effect of a focal, self-applied upper extremity (UE) vibration intervention on UE spasticity for individuals with tetraplegia. The secondary objectives were to explore the acceptability and ease of use of this intervention. SETTING: Specialty rehabilitation center in Georgia, USA. METHODS: Eleven participants each completed one session of focal, self-applied vibration to the UEs. UE spasticity was measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). UE function was measured using the Box & Block (B&B) test which measures the effectiveness of grasp, transport, and release. These measurements were taken pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 20 min post-intervention. Participants also self-reported the acceptability and usability of the intervention, their perception of change in their spasticity and completed the Qualities of Spasticity Questionnaire. RESULTS: In the full group analysis of the spasticity measures, no significant effects were found. Subgroup analysis, however, indicated participants with higher spasticity demonstrated significantly more change on the MAS than the lower spasticity group. Analysis did not reveal any impact of the intervention on UE function as measured by the B&B. Ten out of eleven participants indicated that they agreed or strongly agreed that the intervention would be valuable to have at home. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with higher spasticity demonstrated decreased spasticity after focal UE vibration, although there was no clear effect on grasp, transport and release function. Participants were satisfied with the intervention; most were able to use it independently and indicated it would be a valuable home intervention.

Efficacy of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation versus Whole Body Vibration for Spasticity Reduction in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) and whole-body vibration (WBV) each have a robust ability to activate spinal afferents. Both forms of stimulation have been shown to influence spasticity in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), and may be viable non-pharmacological approaches to spasticity management. In thirty-two individuals with motor-incomplete SCI, we used a randomized crossover design to compare single-session effects of TSS versus WBV on quadriceps spasticity, as measured by the pendulum test. TSS (50 Hz, 400 µs, 15 min) was delivered in supine through a cathode placed over the thoracic spine (T11-T12) and an anode over the abdomen. WBV (50 Hz; eight 45-s bouts) was delivered with the participants standing on a vibration platform. Pendulum test first swing excursion (FSE) was measured at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 15 and 45 min post-intervention. In the whole-group analysis, there were no between- or within-group differences of TSS and WBV in the change from baseline FSE to any post-intervention timepoints. Significant correlations between baseline FSE and change in FSE were associated with TSS at all timepoints. In the subgroup analysis, participants with more pronounced spasticity showed significant decreases in spasticity immediately post-TSS and 45 min post-TSS. TSS and WBV are feasible physical therapeutic interventions for the reduction of spasticity, with persistent effects.