Randomized prospective trial of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement.

OBJECTIVE: By convention, most clinicians delay feeding through the gastrostomy tube until 24 h after placement. However, evidence is lacking to support the rationale for such a delay in PEG use. This randomized, prospective study was designed to assess the safety of early feeding after PEG placement. METHODS: One hundred-twelve patients referred for PEG were randomized to begin tube feedings at 4 h (group A) or at 24 h (group B) after placement. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics. Full-strength Isocal was administered with the following schedule: day 1, 100 ml every 4 h for six feedings; day 2, 200 ml every 4 h for six feedings. Immediately before each scheduled feeding, gastric residual volume was recorded and the next feeding was withheld if the residual volume was > 50 percent (gastric retention). Patients were evaluated on day 1, day 2, day 7, and day 30 for major and minor complications. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with regard to age, gender, baseline nutritional status, and indications for PEG placement. On the first day of feeding, 14 of 57 patients (25%) in group A, but only five of 55 patients (9%) in group B, had evidence of gastric retention, p = 0.029. The proportion of patients with high gastric residual volumes was not significantly different on day two. In group B, one death occurred because of aspiration of gastric contents on day 2. All other complications were minor and did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of PEG feedings is safe, well tolerated, and reduces cost by decreasing hospital stay.

Endoscopic cecal perforation: mechanisms of injury.

OBJECTIVE: Most endoscopic perforations of the colon occur in the rectosigmoid area and are thought to be secondary to direct injury from the endoscopic instrument. The aim of this study was to describe the mechanisms of injury and clinical outcome of endoscopic perforation involving the cecum. METHODS: Retrospective review of 6684 consecutive colonoscopic procedures performed at a university hospital over a 7-yr period. RESULTS: Colonoscopy was complicated by perforation in 0.22%. Five of the 15 perforations occurred in the cecum. The mean age of these five patients was 79.6 +/- 17.7 yr (mean +/- SD). Indications for the procedure were bleeding (n = 4) and suspected obstructing cecal mass (n = 1). Abnormal endoscopic findings included diverticulosis, vascular malformations, cecal ulcer/inflammation, mass, and polyps. Perforation was directly attributable to an ancillary procedure (three routine biopsies, one electrocautery) in the cecal area in four patients, and cecal pathology (inflammation, ulceration) was a contributing risk factor in three patients. Mortality was 80%. In contrast, a noncecal perforation usually occurred at the sigmoid region and was associated with technical difficulties, e.g., inability to traverse a stricture or reach the cecum. CONCLUSIONS: Routine forceps biopsy (without electrocautery) is an under-recognized cause of cecal perforation. Ancillary endoscopic interventions in the cecal region should be minimized in elderly patients with evidence of cecal inflammation. Pneumatic injury may be an additional risk factor for cecal perforation in patients with a colonic stricture or a tortuous colon.

Addition of enemas to oral lavage preparation for colonoscopy is not necessary.

To evaluate whether the addition of enemas to oral electrolyte lavage is helpful for colonoscopic preparation, we conducted a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded trial to compare oral lavage plus enemas with oral lavage alone. The quality of preparation, mucosal visualization, and the volume of retained colonic fluid did not differ between the two groups. Twenty-two percent of the patients in the group who received oral lavage plus enemas compared with 12% of the patients in the group that only received oral lavage stated that they would refuse to repeat the preparation for future colonoscopic examination. Seventeen percent of the patients in the group that received oral lavage plus enemas demonstrated anorectal trauma or inflammation compared with only 5% in the group that received oral lavage alone (p = 0.09). These results indicate that the addition of enemas to oral lavage preparation for colonoscopic evaluation cannot be routinely recommended. However, enemas may be considered on an individual basis in the occasional patient unable to consume the complete oral lavage or in whom residual stool is found during colonoscopic evaluation after oral lavage preparation.

Equal aspiration rates from postpylorus and intragastric-placed small-bore nasoenteric feeding tubes: a randomized, prospective study.

Postpylorus delivery of enteral feeding is perceived by many experts to be safer than intragastric delivery. To test this assumption, patients with similar Glasgow Coma Scores were given identical enteral formulas continuously via a 10-French nasoenteric tube, placed into the stomach or beyond the second portion of the duodenum. Observations were made for attainment of desired nutrition, bowel changes, and clinical signs of aspiration. Radiographs of the chest and abdomen were obtained every 3 days. If a tube migrated out of a chosen location, it was replaced. Thirty-three patients were studied. Seventeen patients were fed into the stomach and 16 patients were fed postpylorus. The mean duration of enteral feeding was 11.8 days for the gastric group and 10.9 days for the postpylorus group (p = NS). The time to deliver the desired kilocalories was 3.33 and 2.77 days (p = NS) for gastric and postpylorus-fed patients. Tubes displaced similarly in each group, gastric 0.647, postpylorus 0.750 per duration of feeding (p = NS). Chest radiographs met the criteria for aspiration pneumonia in 31.3% of gastric and 40% of postpylorus-fed patients (p = NS). Together, these data indicate that complications from enterally fed patients are equally common whether the distal port of the feeding tube is in the stomach or beyond the second portion of the duodenum.

Role of caloric intake in the weight loss after jejunoileal bypass for obesity.

Sixty-five patients were studied prospectively after jejunoileal bypass for obesity. Dietary intake pre- and postoperatively was measured either directly by weighing food or by a research dietary history. Of 65 measurements, 59 were made at least 6 months after operation, when over 75% of weight loss had been achieved. Fat absorption was measured in 42 of the patients. The entire group ate fewer calories (mean +/- SE = 2595 +/- 135) postoperatively than preoperatively (mean +/- SE = 3261 +/- 138). This difference was highly significant (P less than 0.001). Forty-eight patients ate less after their operation. The caloric deficit calculated from the observed weight loss could be accounted for entirely by the estimated decrease in intake in 22 of the 48 patients who ate less postoperatively. Moreover, measured fat malabsorption accounted for only 31% of the observed weight loss in those who ate more postoperatively and 21% in those who ate less. We conclude that a decrease in caloric intake, along with malabsorption, is an important factor in the long term postoperative weight loss (1-9 months) after jejunoileal bypass for obesity.

Enteritis cystica profunda.

In addition to hamartomatous polyps of the small intestine, a patient with Peutz-Jeghers disease had gross and microscopic lesions of the ileum that were analogous to colitis cystica profunda in the large intestine and rectum. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first such case in an adult to be reported. They suggest the designation, "enteritis cystica profunda." The histology of the lesions and their association with a disease known to produce hamartomatous lesions lend support to the proposition that some cases of colitis cystica are also hamartamatous. It is also believed that some reported cases of small-intestinal adenocarcinoma in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome are in reality examples of the benign process of enteritis cystica profunda.