Management of Femur Fractures during COVID-19 Pandemic Period: The Influence of Vaccination and Nosocomial COVID-19 Infection.

The COVID-19 pandemic management has led to a significant change in orthopedic surgical activity. During the pandemic, femur fractures in patients over 65 years of age have maintained a constant incidence. Our study will focus on this fragile population, analyzing the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection during hospital stays and the clinical and radiographic orthopedic outcomes. We also evaluated the va\riation of COVID-19 infection after health professionals' vaccinations, and the influence of inter-hospital transfers caused by logistical and organizational aspects of the pandemic. Material and Methods: This is a descriptive and prospective study from 13 October 2020 to 15 March 2021. Participants were patients over 65 years of age with diagnoses of proximal femoral fractures with r surgical treatments indicated. We compared the SARS-CoV-2 infected patients during the stay with non-infected cases. A second evaluation was carried out dividing the patients into those who underwent inter-hospital transfers and a group without transfers. We subdivided the study period into two, according to the percentage of healthcare workers vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. The reported clinical variables included the Parker and Palmer Score, the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score, the Harris Hip Score, mortality, the Rush Score, and evaluation of reduction in radio-lucent lines in prosthetic implants. Results: Ninety-three patients were studied. The whole positive COVID cohort (11.83%) was hospitalized during the period when less than 80% of health workers were vaccinated (p = 0.02). The COVID cohort and the patients transferred before surgery had longer stays in the Emergency Room (p = 0.019; p = 0.00007) and longer lengths of stay compared to the other patients (p = 0.00001; p = 0.001). Mortality was higher both in the infected group and in the patients who underwent a transfer before the surgical procedure (18.18% vs. 1.22 %; p = 0.003. 25% vs. 6.85%; p = 0.02). In terms of orthopedic outcomes measured through the third month of follow-up, we found worse score results in functional and radiographic outcomes in the COVID positive cohort and in the transferred patients' cohort. Conclusions: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients treated for proximal femur fracture was statistically significant. Patients with Coronavirus during hospitalization obtained poor short-term radiographic and functional results and increased peri-operative mortality. The incidence of intra-hospital infection was high during the period in which health professionals were not yet covered by the anti-COVID vaccination cycle. Patients who were transferred between two hospitals due to pandemic-related management issues also achieved reduced outcomes compared to non-transferred cases, with increased mortality.

Trauma workload during COVID19 lockdown: an analysis of incidence in 4 million people.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to report the trauma workload during COVID19 lockdown in a region of four million people and to compare it with the same period in 2019. METHODS: The regional register for A&E admissions and hospitalizations has been reviewed in order to compare the number of A&D admission, the triage colour codes rates, aetiology of trauma, number of patients hospitalized for trauma, number of fractures that required surgery, type of fractures and injuries and mean patients' age. RESULTS: During lockdown 7314 patients were admitted in A&E, while 22,508 patients were admitted in 2019. In 2020 and 2019 triage codes were respectively distributed as follows: red code 0.1% vs 0.2%, yellow code 8.9% vs 6.3%, green code 84% vs 84.7% and white code 6% vs 8.8%. (p = 0.042). The number of hospitalized patients for trauma was 670 in 2020, while in 2019 was 1774 (p = 0.02). The most common fracture that required surgery was femur fracture (409 in 2020 vs 635 in 2019); fracture subtype distribution and mean age of the patients were significantly different in the two groups (respectively p < 0.01 and p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: One month of lockdown showed a 68% decrease in the number of A&E visits and a 74% decrease of fractures that required surgery. Femur fracture showed the lowest decrease moving from 635 to 409 units but increasing their incidence rate (42 to 61%).

Intravenous treatment with biphosphates in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a pathological persistence of spontaneous or evoked disproportionate pain. Several drugs are employed, but only bisphosphonates seem to have good outcomes. The purpose of our research is to analyze the characteristics of the cases victims of CRPS and study the beneficial effect of the intravenous nerindronic acid sodium salt (Nerixia®), in an attempt to improve the results in this disabling disease. Materials and methods: We retrospectively examined 30 cases of CRPS that had undergone intravenous nerindronic acid sodium salt therapy in our center. The patients were contacted after 12 months from the start of therapy and their clinical situation was assessed with Quick DASH Score. Results: The average age of our group was 59,76 years (span, 42-78), and female subjects were 84% (p-value <0.05). 72% of all cases were complications of wrist fractures.). The Quick DASH Score (19 points are the best result, 95 the worst outcome) average was 41,1 points. The values of Quick DASH Score differed significantly (p-value <0.001) according to the age of the patient. In addition, the DASH Score values were related to the sex of the patient (p-value <0.001). Male subjects have obtained a better score. After 12 months of intravenous therapy, 52% of cases reports that they still have joint stiffness. The DASH values differed significantly depending on the onset of intravenous treatment (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Our study showed that the CRPS affects a population between 42 and 78 years, especially women. Treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates seems to lead to an improvement in CRPS symptoms, in particular administration between 3 and 6 months after the onset of the disease. In particular, women over 61 years of age seem to have a lower improvement in symptomatology after treatment. 52% of cases report that they still have joint stiffness.

Falls from height: orthopaedic and psychiatric evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Fall from a height is one of the major causes of significant trauma with high morbidity and mortality rates. Traumatological damage control is often the primary treatment both for suicide attempt survivors and for accidental fall victims, but management of the hospitalization of psychiatric patients requires more resources than other patients. METHODS: Retrospective multidisciplinary study (psychiatric and orthopaedic evaluation) and analysis of psychiatric and trauma characteristics of patients fallen from height admitted to our trauma centre. We analysed patterns of patients after suicidal jumps and accidental falls to look for possible trends that may trigger projects for further improvement of care. RESULTS: 205 patients were analysed, 137 were included: 65 suicide attempt survivors and 72 accidental fall victims. Between these two groups there are no differences about the anaesthesiologic acute management or the number of damage control procedures. However, the psychiatric patients stay longer in hospital especially in intensive care unit with prolonged intubation (p<0.001). Suicide attempt survivors are significant correlated with fractures of feet, but the orthopaedic lesions do not involve an increase of definitive interventions (p< 0.05). CONCLUSION: We showed that the suicide attempt survivors and accidental victims need the same acute management. The orthopedic definitive surgical procedures are similar between the two groups, but in spite of this patients with psychiatric disorder were associated with a statistically significant increase of care in intensive care unit and hospitalization. Our results allow to create a new multidisciplinary approach for these patients.

Combining nerve and tendon transfers in tetraplegia: a proposal of a new surgical strategy based on literature review.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is very common, most frequently resulting from motor vehicle accidents and falling from a height. Often, SCI occurs at the cervical level, resulting in tetraplegia, which consists of loss of effective arm and/or hand function. For these patients, hand function is considered the most desired function, above bowel, bladder and sexual function. Fortunately, understanding about nerve and tendon transfers is steadily growing, providing new surgical solutions for functional restoration in tetraplegia patients. The primary aim of this systematic review of the literature is to assess all the various ways to improve upper-limb function, using both nerve transfers and classical tendon transfers in patients suffering from tetraplegia. Surgical indications, optimum timing and contraindications were reviewed. In accordance with the International Classification for Surgery of the Hand in Tetraplegia, ten subgroups of tetraplegic patients were analysed and a proposal for treatment combining nerve and tendon transfers formulated for each subgroup, seeking alternatives to classical surgical strategies. We also sought to propose strategies that, in instances of failure, still would allow for the use of some classical surgical approach. Starting with traditional management, we proposed new strategies using tenodesis and tendon transfers in association with nerve surgery. We believe that the suggestions described in the current paper could both improve and complete current surgical strategies and contribute to ensuring that more patients benefit from these options in future.