ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical treatments and outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort of neonates with Hirschsprung's disease (HD). METHODS: Using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) from 1999 to 2009, neonates diagnosed with HD were identified and classified as having a single stage pull-through (SSPT) or multi-stage pull-through (MSPT). Diagnosis and classification algorithms and clinical variables and outcomes were validated by multi-institutional chart review. Groups were compared using logistic regression modeling and propensity-score matched analysis to account for baseline differences between groups. RESULTS: 1555 neonates with HD were identified; 77.2% underwent SSPT and 22.8% underwent MSPT. Misclassification of disease or surgical treatment was <2%. Rates of SSPT increased over time (p=0.03). Compared to SSPT, patients undergoing MSPT had significantly lower birth weights and higher rates of prematurity, non-HD gastrointestinal anomalies, enterocolitis, and preoperative mechanical ventilation. Patients undergoing MSPT had significantly higher rates of readmissions (58.5 vs. 37.9%) and additional operations (38.7 vs. 26%). Results were consistent in the propensity-score matched analysis. CONCLUSION: Most neonates with HD undergo SSPT. In patients with similar observed baseline characteristics, MSPT was associated with worse outcomes suggesting that some infants currently selected to undergo MSPT may have better outcomes with SSPT. However, there remains a subgroup of MSPT patients who were too ill to be adequately compared to SSPT patients; for this subgroup of severely ill infants with HD, MSPT may be the best option.
Subject(s)
Anal Canal/surgery , Colon/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Hirschsprung Disease/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/trends , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Female , Hirschsprung Disease/diagnosis , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report our experience with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for pediatric soft tissue sarcomas to add to the limited literature about its feasibility, utility, and concordance with pre-operative imaging, including CT and (18)F-FDG PET (PET) scanning. METHODS: Medical records of patients with a sarcoma who underwent SLNB as part of their treatment for a soft tissue sarcoma at our institution from 2000 to 2011 were identified and reviewed. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent SLNB for soft tissue sarcoma during the study period. Two patients had positive SLNBs; both of these patients had rhabdomyosarcoma. Three patients with pathologically enlarged lymph nodes on CT scan underwent PET functional imaging prior to SLNB. The PET suggested the presence of nodal disease in all three patients; however, only one of these patients had a positive SLNB. CONCLUSIONS: Our series confirms that SLNB is feasible in pediatric sarcoma patients. Small numbers preclude definitive conclusions regarding the utility of SLNB compared with PET, however our data suggest functional imaging alone may not be sufficient to definitively determine lymph node status in these patients. Surgical lymph node sampling may still need to be performed to accurately identify nodal status in pediatric patients with soft tissue sarcoma.
