Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scott Med J ; 61(1): 17-25, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27334530

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients admitted to hospital for deliberate self-harm by burning (DSHB) provide a challenge for medical, surgical and psychological management. We retrospectively reviewed all the patients admitted to a Scottish regional burn unit with DSHB over an 11-year period to assess demographics and outcome. METHODS: Ward admission data were used to identify DSHB patients admitted to the South East Scotland regional burn unit in Livingston, UK between 2002 and 2012, as well as a control group of accidental burn patients. Data were extracted concerning burn injury, psychiatric history and inpatient management. RESULTS: A total of 53 DSHB patients with 58 attendances over the 11-year period were compared to 49 accidental burns patients. Compared to controls, DSHB patients were more likely to be unemployed, live alone and have a previous psychiatric diagnosis (p < 0.01). DSHB patients had more severe burns, a longer hospital stay and were more likely to undergo surgery (p < 0.01). DSHB patients with previous self-harm, suicide attempts and diagnoses of personality and eating disorder all had significantly less severe burns than DSHB patients without these risk factors (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, DSHB patients have more severe burn injuries and require longer, resource-intensive hospital stays. Burn units should have an appropriate specialist psychologist/psychiatrist who works within the Burn multi-disciplinary team to help manage this complex group of patients' healthcare needs and reduce their risk of further self-harm.


Subject(s)
Burns/epidemiology , Burns/psychology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Burn Units , Burns/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Scotland/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 135(3): 751-760, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25719694

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent innovations in abdominoplasty include progressive tension "quilting" sutures or Scarpa fascia preservation to limit the risk of seromas and hematomas. No-drain abdominoplasty with progressive tension sutures has been well documented. The authors describe outcomes in patients undergoing abdominoplasty with a modified surgical technique (including sub-Scarpa fascia fat preservation) and no use of drains or progressive tension sutures-the "no-drain, no-quilt" abdominoplasty. METHODS: A retrospective, single-surgeon (A.A.Q.), single-site analysis of all abdominoplasty patients from 2003 to 2012 was performed. Data were extracted from paper case notes. All patients underwent surgery carried out under general anesthesia. The operative technique and postoperative regimen are described. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-one patients were identified over the 10-year period. Patients had a mean age of 45 years and mean body mass index of 27, and 98 percent were women. Concomitant abdominal liposuction was undertaken in 61 percent of all patients (165 of 271). Twenty-one patients (7.7 percent) had a seroma and five patients (1.8 percent) had a hematoma. Seven patients (2.6 percent) required a return to the operating room to manage complications, and 24 (8.9 percent) required elective revision. Patients were admitted for an average of 1.7 days, and mean follow-up was 6.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominoplasty can be performed safely without drains or quilting sutures/progressive tension sutures. Benefits are discussed in terms of the potential for reduced intraoperative time (compared with progressive tension sutures), and reduced patient discomfort and inpatient stay (compared with drain use). The authors demonstrate low complication and elective revision rates in their series. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty/methods , Fasciotomy , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Sutures , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lipectomy/methods , Male , Operative Time , Reoperation/trends , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL