Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hand (N Y) ; 18(3): NP7-NP15, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36214276

ABSTRACT

Intensive postoperative rehabilitation therapy is associated with positive functional recovery in hand transplants (HTs). Our goal is to share the hand therapy protocol developed for our patient who underwent a combined face and bilateral HT. The patient is a 23-year-old right-hand-dominant male with a history of third-degree burns to 80% of his body following a motor vehicle accident. A multidisciplinary evaluation established his candidacy for a combined face and bilateral HT, and surgery took place in August 2020. Our individualized hand therapy protocol consisted of 4 phases. The pre-surgery phase focused on planning the orthotics and patient/caregivers' education on the rehabilitation process. The intensive care unit (ICU)/acute care phase involved hand allograft protection and positioning via orthotic fabrication, safe limb handling, and edema/wound management. The inpatient rehabilitation phase aimed to prepare the patient for independent living via neuromuscular and sensory re-education, improvement of upper extremities strength/flexibility, training basic activities of daily living, and providing a home exercise program (HEP). Finally, the outpatient phase aimed to maximize our patient's range of motion and independency in performing his routine activities and HEP. The patient's post-transplant functional outcomes showed a significant improvement compared to the pre-operative baseline. We hope this report sheds light on a comprehensive hand therapy program in HT.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Hand Transplantation , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Adult , Recovery of Function , Upper Extremity , Exercise Therapy/methods
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31844006

ABSTRACT

The in vitro and in vivo activity of the arylamidine T-2307 against Candida auris was evaluated. T-2307 demonstrated in vitro activity (MIC ranges ≤ 0.008 to 0.015 µg/ml at 50% inhibition; 0.125 to >4 µg/ml at 100% inhibition). Treatment with T-2307 (3 mg/kg subcutaneous [SC] once daily) also significantly improved survival (70% at 21 days postinfection) and reduced kidney fungal burden (5.06 log10 CFU/g) compared to control (0% survival and 7.09 log10 CFU/g) (P < 0.01).


Subject(s)
Amidines/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida/pathogenicity , Candidiasis, Invasive/drug therapy , Animals , Candida/drug effects , Caspofungin/therapeutic use , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Resistance, Fungal , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred ICR
4.
Hand (N Y) ; 11(4): 464-468, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28149215

ABSTRACT

Background: There is poor consensus in the literature regarding associated functional limitation and the preferred wrist position for total wrist arthrodesis. The purpose of the current investigation was twofold: (1) to assess the functional limitations of wrist arthrodesis and (2) to determine the optimal position for wrist arthrodesis using a simulated wrist fusion model. Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers underwent simulated wrist arthrodesis in 6 different positions using custom-molded wrist splints: 15° extension with 0° radio-ulnar deviation, 15° extension with 10° ulnar deviation, 15° extension with 10° radial deviation, 0° extension with 0° radio-ulnar deviation, 0° extension with 10° ulnar deviation, and 0° extension with 10° radial deviation. Each volunteer was independently assessed for wrist function using the Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, and satisfaction in the simulated wrist fusion positions. Comparisons between all simulated fusion wrists and the baseline unsplinted wrist as well as among the 6 simulated fusion positions were performed. Results: Turning over a card (5.1 vs 4.3 seconds), picking up small objects (7.1 vs 5.8 seconds), and simulated feeding (8.3 vs 7.1 seconds) as well as total Jebsen-Taylor test duration (41.8 vs 37.9 seconds) was significantly longer in simulated fusion wrists. Both grip strength (55.9 vs 80.7 kg) and satisfaction scores (6.4 vs 9.6) were lower in simulated fusion wrists. Wrists in 0° extension also demonstrated significantly shorter durations in stacking checkers than wrists in 15° extension. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that wrist arthrodesis may only compromise select wrist functions. Among the tested wrist fusion positions, wrists fused in neutral may demonstrate better function than wrist fused in slight extension. However, grip strength and satisfaction seem to be unaffected by wrist fusion position.


Subject(s)
Arthrodesis/methods , Wrist Joint/physiopathology , Wrist Joint/surgery , Adult , Female , Hand Deformities/physiopathology , Hand Strength/physiology , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...