Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Conserv Biol ; 29(6): 1647-57, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26183708

ABSTRACT

International case studies of protected area performance increasingly report that conservation and socio-economic outcomes are interdependent. Effective conservation requires support and cooperation from local governments and communities, which in turn requires that protected areas contribute to the economic well-being of the communities in which they are sited. Despite increasing recognition of their importance, robust studies that document the socio-economic impacts of protected areas are rare, especially in the developed world context. We proposed 3 potential pathways through which protected areas might benefit local communities in the developed world: the improved local housing value, local business stimulus, and increased local funding pathways. We examined these pathways by undertaking a statistical longitudinal analysis of 110 regional and rural communities covering an area of approximately 600,000 km(2) in southeastern Australia. We compared trends in 10 socio-economic indicators describing employment, income, housing, business development and local government revenue from 2000 to 2010. New protected areas acquisitions led to an increased number of new dwelling approvals and associated developer contributions, increased local business numbers, and increased local government revenue from user-pays services and grants. Longer-term effects of established protected areas included increased local council revenue from a variety of sources. Our findings provide support for each of our 3 proposed benefit pathways and contribute new insights into the cycling of benefits from protected areas through the economy over time. The business and legislative models in our study are typical of those operating in many other developed countries; thus, the benefit pathways reported in our study are likely to be generalizable. By identifying and communicating socio-economic benefits from terrestrial protected areas in a developed world context, our findings represent an important step in securing local support and ongoing high-level protection for key components of the world's biodiversity.


Subject(s)
Commerce , Conservation of Natural Resources/economics , Housing , Biodiversity , Models, Theoretical , New South Wales , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Sch Inq Nurs Pract ; 15(3): 277-94, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11871585

ABSTRACT

This study tested effects of a nurse-administered self-efficacy intervention given on five monthly occasions and designed to enhance patients' self-care self-efficacy. The hypotheses were that at four months and eight months after beginning chemotherapy the efficacy-enhancing experimental group would have significantly higher scores on quality of life and self-care self-efficacy than the control group and significantly less symptom distress. Fifty-six women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer were randomized to the experimental and control groups. Outcome variables were quality of life, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Breast (FACT-B), symptom distress, measured by the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), and factors of self-care self-efficacy, measured by Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health (SUPPH). The interaction effects for the FACT-B ranged from small for functional concerns (eta square = .03) to large for social concerns (eta square = .110); effects for the SDS were large (eta square = .140), and for factors on the SUPPH effect sizes ranged from small (eta square = .01) for Enjoying Life and Stress Reduction to medium (eta square = .089) for Coping, and large (eta square = .141) for Making Decisions. Interventions to promote self-efficacy may increase quality of life and decrease symptom distress for women diagnosed with breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Education as Topic , Quality of Life , Self Care , Self Efficacy , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Breast Neoplasms/nursing , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , New Jersey
3.
Arch Fam Med ; 7(1): 14, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9443691
4.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 14(5): 885-91, 1988 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3283085

ABSTRACT

Between October 1976 and May 1984, 156 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were entered into a Phase III trial with the participation of five institutions. Patients were randomly assigned to receive photons only (50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks plus intracavitary applications or external-beam boost) or mixed-beam radiotherapy (2 fractions a week of neutrons, 3 fractions a week of photons to a total RBE-adjusted dose of 50 Gy over 5 weeks plus intracavitary applications or external mixed-beam boost). Only patients with squamous carcinoma of FIGO Stages IIB, III, or IVA with negative para-aortic nodes on lymphangiogram were eligible. Ten patients were excluded from the analysis because of ineligibility or cancellation. Of the 146 patients analyzed, 80 were treated with mixed-beam radiotherapy and 66 with photons. Patients were grouped by stage and institution. The percentage of patients undergoing intracavitary applications was 50% on mixed beam and 75% on photons (p less than 0.01). Tumor clearance was 52% and 72% for mixed beam and photons, respectively (p less than 0.03). Local control at 2 years was 45% for mixed beam and 52% for photons. Median survivals were 1.9 years on mixed beam and 2.3 years on photons. Severe complications occurred in 19% and 11% in mixed beam and photons respectively (p less than 0.13). The inferior outcome with neutron therapy in this study may have resulted from the use of horizontal neutron beams of varying energy and penetration. A new randomized trial using high-energy hospital-based cyclotrons with gantry-mounted beam-delivery systems has recently been activated to evaluate more rigorously the role of fast-neutron therapy for advanced cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Neutrons/therapeutic use , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Brachytherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Random Allocation
5.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 13(4): 541-9, 1987 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3104249

ABSTRACT

Between August 1980 and November 1984, 119 patients with FIGO Stage IIIB or IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were randomized to receive radiation therapy (4600 cGy pelvis plus 1000 cGy parametrial boost) followed by intracavitary or external boost to the primary with or without misonidazole (MISO) (400 mg/m2 daily 2 to 4 hours prior to radiation therapy). Patients in the two treatment groups were evenly distributed with respect to stratification variables including stage, Karnofsky Performance score, and positivity of para-aortic nodes. Eighty-nine percent of patients had Stage IIIB disease and 88% had a Karnofsky score of 80 or better. Seventy-five percent of patients treated with radiation therapy alone and 79% of patients treated with radiation therapy plus MISO received a boost via intracavitary application. Life threatening (Grade 4) complications occurred in 5 patients receiving radiation therapy alone and one patient receiving radiation therapy plus MISO. MISO toxicity (Grade 3) was limited to severe nausea and vomiting in two patients. With 119 evaluable patients and a median follow-up of 33 months, 64% of patients receiving radiation therapy alone are alive at 18 months compared with 54% for patients assigned to radiation therapy plus MISO. The median survival for patients treated with radiation therapy alone and radiation therapy plus MISO was 1.9 years and 1.6 respectively. At this point in the study the difference in survival is inconsistent with the hypothesis of an improvement associated with MISO. There have been 23 deaths among the 49 patients treated with radiation therapy plus MISO who have been followed for at least 18 months compared with 17 deaths in 48 patients treated with radiation therapy alone. The chance of observing this number of deaths with radiation therapy plus MISO if the addition of MISO improves survival by 10 to 20% is 0.003 and less than 0.001, respectively. The addition of MISO to radiation failed to improve survival for these patients. The results cannot be explained by an uncharacteristically high survival on the radiation therapy alone arm or by an imbalance in the distribution of prognostic factors. Local-regional control remains a problem in the management of patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. More effective and less toxic radiosensitizing agents are needed.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Misonidazole/therapeutic use , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brachytherapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Random Allocation
6.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 12(7): 1101-3, 1986 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3528087

ABSTRACT

Between August 1980 and November 1984, 120 patients with FIGO Stage IIIB or IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were randomized to receive radiation therapy (RT) (46 Gy pelvis + 10 Gy parametrial boost) followed by intracavitary or external boost to the primary +/- misonidazole (MISO) (400 mg/M2 2-4 hours prior to RT daily, maximum 12 gm/M2). The median at 24-28 hr misonidazole plasma level was 20 micrograms/ml 2-6 hr and 3.5 micrograms/ml. Approximately 60% of the patients on RT + MISO received 100% of expected total Misonidazole dose; peripheral neurologic toxicity was reported for nine patients receiving misonidazole (8 with mild and 1 with moderate paresthesia or pain). Time-dependent regression analyses found that actual cumulative misonidazole dose was not related to duration of survival from start of treatment (p = 0.5). MISO dose expressed as a percent of expected dose was marginally related to increased survival measured from 14 weeks on on study (p = 0.1). No improvement in survival was observed with the addition of misonidazole to RT (64% of the patients on RT alone were alive at 18 months versus 54% of those on RT + MISO).


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Misonidazole/administration & dosage , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Misonidazole/adverse effects , Prognosis , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/adverse effects , Random Allocation , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/drug therapy
7.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 8(2): 118-27, 1985 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3914838

ABSTRACT

Between 1976 and 1981, 147 patients with residual, inoperable, or locally recurrent carcinoma of the rectum were randomized to receive either radiation (XRT) alone or XRT plus chemotherapy (concomitant 5-FU during XRT and maintenance 5-FU + MeCCNU). An initial field received 4,500-5,100 rad in 5-6 weeks, with a boost field dose to a maximum of 7000 rad/8 weeks (maximum 6,000 rad/7 weeks with chemotherapy), dependent on findings of special small bowel films. One hundred twenty-nine patients were evaluable (65 XRT, 64 XRT + chemo). There were no statistically significant differences between treatments with respect to overall survival, complete remission rate, time to disease progression, local failure rate, or radiation dose distribution. Median survival was 17 months for XRT, 18 months for XRT + chemo; the 2-year survival probability was 36% for XRT, 44% for XRT + chemo. Initial performance status was a significant prognostic factor for both survival and time to disease progression. A trend was observed favoring the combination treatment for patients with residual disease. Treatment complications were greater for the combined modality arm than for radiation alone. Twenty-seven patients (22%) were alive at last data analysis, with no evidence of disease (NED) from 2-51 months (30 months median). Patients with resection of gross disease before or after irradiation had a much better result than those with gross residual or without any resection, but the relative influence of patient selection versus impact of surgery remains unclear.


Subject(s)
Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Sigmoid Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Abscess/etiology , Actuarial Analysis , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Necrosis/etiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Random Allocation , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Reoperation , Semustine/administration & dosage , Sigmoid Neoplasms/drug therapy , Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery
8.
J Exp Anal Behav ; 28(2): 133-44, 1977 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16812020

ABSTRACT

The joint control of rate of key pecking in pigeons by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relationships was studied in the context of a two-component multiple schedule of reinforcement. Food presentation was always associated with one component and extinction with the other. The stimulus-reinforcer relationship was manipulated by varying the relative durations of the two components. In the food-presentation component, a fixed rate of reinforcement, independent of rate of responding, was generated by a schedule referred to as "T*". One aspect of the response-reinforcer relationship, contiguity, was manipulated by varying the percentage of delayed reinforcers. With the multiple T* extinction schedule, stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relationships could be varied independently of one another. Rate of key pecking was sensitive to manipulations of both relationships. However, significant differential effects due to either the stimulus-reinforcer or response-reinforcer relationship were obtained only when the other relationship was weak: stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relationships interacted in the joint control of responding.

9.
Ann Surg ; 181(6): 809-12, 1975 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1094968

ABSTRACT

Effects of intermittent (IPPB) and positive eng-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation on accumulation of pulmonary edema were compared, in dogs, after infusion of oleic acid. Pulmonary extravascular water was approximated as lung thermal volume (LTV), a double indicator method based on differential transit time for simultaneously injected right-to-left conductivity and thermal pulses. LTV was found to be decreased in animals treated with PEEP. The possibility that observed LTV changes reflect only the effect of PEEP on flow distribution, not lung water, was examined by alternating PEEP and IPPB; short-term changes in LTV did not occur. Mean values of other factors influencing pulmonary water transfer, e.g., pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, serum protein, arterial blood gasses, were not significantly different with or without PEEP. It was concluded that, for the oleic acid lesion, PEEP effects a small reduction in the rate of accumulation of pulmonary edema.


Subject(s)
Lung Volume Measurements , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/chemically induced , Animals , Body Water , Dogs , Humans , Hydrostatic Pressure , Intermittent Positive-Pressure Breathing , Lung/metabolism , Oleic Acids , Organ Size
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...