An initial set of reference values for the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Limits of Stability protocol.

BACKGROUND: The Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Limits of Stability (LOS) protocol is a relatively new means of evaluating unconstrained dynamic postural control ability. While the reliability of this protocol has previously been established, reference data is currently unavailable to assist in the interpretation of results. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are typical reference values for the BTrackS LOS protocol with respect to sex, height, and BMI? METHODS: A cross= -section of 800 healthy, young adults (aged 18-29 years; 368 men, 432 women) were administered the BTrackS LOS protocol. Sex, height and weight variables were also captured for the participants. RESULTS: Results of a stepwise linear regression showed that the outcome measure for BTrackS LOS testing (i.e. LOS Area) was larger in taller individuals and in men. Based on these findings, four percentile ranking categories were established and associated look-up tables created. SIGNIFICANCE: The reference values provided by this study offer much needed guidance to clinicians and researchers for the determination of dynamic balance abnormalities based on BTrackS LOS testing.

Six Weeks of at Home BTrackS Target Tracking Training Induces Sustained Dynamic Balance Improvement in Healthy Young Adults.

Purpose: The Balance Tracking System's Target Tracking Training protocol requires an individual to keep an onscreen dot within a moving target circle via leaning movements that are sensed by a Balance Tracking System's balance plate. The present study sought to determine for the first time if short duration at-home training using Balance Tracking System's Target Tracking Training could improve dynamic balance. Methods: Fifteen healthy young adults (mean age = 22.4 years) performed Balance Tracking System's Target Tracking Training for six weeks at home, with an average of five, three-minute sessions per week. The first three weeks of Balance Tracking System's Target Tracking Training were completed on the firm surface of a Balance Tracking Systems Balance Plate, while the final three weeks were performed on a foam cushion on top of the plate. This was followed by a three-week retention period where participants performed no training. Dynamic balance changes were assessed at multiple timepoints with the Balance Tracking System's Limits of Stability protocol. Results: Participants significantly improved Balance Tracking System's Target Tracking Training from the first to last day of training in both three-week periods (p<0.01). This increase was mirrored by improved Balance Tracking System's Limits of Stability results. Specifically, Balance Tracking System's Limits of Stability area (ie dynamic balance) increased significantly from Baseline to the end of the first three weeks of training (p<0.001), and again after the second three weeks (p<0.01). These gains were maintained following the retention period. Conclusion: The present findings support use of short duration Balance Tracking System's Target Tracking Training to improve dynamic balance at home. This increase in dynamic balance could ultimately be used a practical means of improving athletic performance.

Quick on Your Feet: Modifying the Star Excursion Balance Test with a Cognitive Motor Response Time Task.

The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) is a common assessment used across clinical and research settings to test dynamic standing balance. The primary measure of this test is maximal reaching distance performed by the non-stance limb. Response time (RT) is a critical cognitive component of dynamic balance control and the faster the RT, the better the postural control and recovery from a postural perturbation. However, the measure of RT has not been done in conjunction with SEBT, especially with musculoskeletal fatigue. The purpose of this study is to examine RT during a SEBT, creating a modified SEBT (mSEBT), with a secondary goal to examine the effects of muscular fatigue on RT during SEBT. Sixteen healthy young male and female adults [age: 20 ± 1 years; height: 169.48 ± 8.2 cm; weight: 67.93 ± 12.7 kg] performed the mSEBT in five directions for three trials, after which the same was repeated with a response time task using Blazepod™ with a random stimulus. Participants then performed a low-intensity musculoskeletal fatigue task and completed the above measures again. A 2 × 2 × 3 repeated measures ANOVA was performed to test for differences in mean response time across trials, fatigue states, and leg reach as within-subjects factors. All statistical analyses were conducted in JASP at an alpha level of 0.05. RT was significantly faster over the course of testing regardless of reach leg or fatigue state (p = 0.023). Trial 3 demonstrated significantly lower RT compared to Trial 1 (p = 0.021). No significant differences were found between fatigue states or leg reach. These results indicate that response times during the mSEBT with RT is a learned skill that can improve over time. Future research should include an extended familiarization period to remove learning effects and a greater fatigue state to test for differences in RT during the mSEBT.

Lower Limb Asymmetry Evaluation Using the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Single Leg Stance Protocol.

Single Leg Stance (SLS) balance testing is a common means of determining lower limb asymmetries in motor behavior. The Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Balance Plate is a low-cost, portable force plate for objectively obtaining balance measurements. The present study provides the first known balance results for the BTrackS SLS protocol. BTrackS SLS testing was conducted on 161 young adults (90 women, 71 men) according to the test's standardized instructions. Specifically, participants performed one-legged (left or right) stance on the BTrackS Balance Plate for four, (2 practice, 2 actual) 20 s trials. SLS test outputs included total Center of Pressure path length and absolute symmetry index. Results showed that women had better SLS performance than men and that both sexes performed better on the actual compared to practice trial. Systematic one-sample t-tests of the Absolute Symmetry Index measures showed that a difference of 16% or greater between legs represented asymmetric performance. These results have clear value for individuals using BTrackS SLS testing to evaluate potential asymmetries. Additionally, these findings agree with previous reports showing sex differences favoring women on tests of static balance, and validate the use of a practice trial in the BTrackS SLS protocol.

Impact of Sub-Clinical and Clinical Compression Socks on Postural Stability Tasks among Individuals with Ankle Instability.

Compression socks are used by a very diverse group of individuals and may potentially have a greater impact on physically diminished or impaired individuals as opposed to healthy individuals. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of sub-clinical (SC) and clinical (CL) compression socks among healthy (CON), copers (COP), and individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Postural stability was evaluated in 20 participants (11 males and 9 females) using Balance Tracking System Balance platform (BTrackS™) during the modified clinical test of sensory integration in balance (mCTSIB) and limits of stability (LOS) tests. Postural sway parameters were analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance 3 (group: CON, COP, and CAI) by 3 (compression condition: BF, SC, and CL) × 4 (balance condition: EO, EC, EOF, and ECF) for mCTSIB and a 3 (group: CON, COP, and CAI) by 3 (compression condition: BF, SC, CL) × 4 (balance condition: FL, BL, BR, FR) for LOS. Results revealed significantly greater postural stability with both SC and CL compression socks when compared to barefoot conditions. However, no significant differences were observed among groups for compression socks grades. Both SC and CL compression socks may be effective in increasing postural stability.

Test-Retest Reliability of the Balance Tracking System Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance Protocol Across Multiple Time Durations.

BACKGROUND: Postural control is critical for body sway control and is subserved by three sources of sensory feedback (ie, vision, proprioception and vestibulation). A method for determining the relative contribution of each sensory feedback source to postural control is the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance for the balance tracking system (BTrackS). However, this method has not yet been evaluated for test-retest reliability. PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest reliability of the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol for the BTrackS across multiple time intervals. METHODS: Three groups of healthy young adults performed the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol four times separated by either one day, one week or one month. Within each time duration group, and condition, differences in total center of pressure path length were determined from one test session to the next and intra class correlation coefficient categorizations were made. RESULTS: In all but one case, no significant difference in performance was seen from one testing session to the next. The one significant difference found was a decrease in total center of pressure path length from day 1 to day 2 in the vestibular condition of the group tested daily. Intra class correlation coefficient results largely indicated fair-good reliability across time durations and test conditions. CONCLUSION: The present study largely supports use of the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol as a means of probing the sensory contributions to balance performance across multiple time durations.