Daily Oral GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Orforglipron for Adults with Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major risk factor for many leading causes of illness and death worldwide. Data are needed regarding the efficacy and safety of the nonpeptide glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist orforglipron as a once-daily oral therapy for weight reduction in adults with obesity. METHODS: In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled adults with obesity, or with overweight plus at least one weight-related coexisting condition, and without diabetes. Participants were randomly assigned to receive orforglipron at one of four doses (12, 24, 36, or 45 mg) or placebo once daily for 36 weeks. The percentage change from baseline in body weight was assessed at week 26 (primary end point) and at week 36 (secondary end point). RESULTS: A total of 272 participants underwent randomization. At baseline, the mean body weight was 108.7 kg, and the mean body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 37.9. At week 26, the mean change from baseline in body weight ranged from -8.6% to -12.6% across the orforglipron dose cohorts and was -2.0% in the placebo group. At week 36, the mean change ranged from -9.4% to -14.7% with orforglipron and was -2.3% with placebo. A weight reduction of at least 10% by week 36 occurred in 46 to 75% of the participants who received orforglipron, as compared with 9% who received placebo. The use of orforglipron led to improvement in all prespecified weight-related and cardiometabolic measures. The most common adverse events reported with orforglipron were gastrointestinal events, which were mild to moderate, occurred primarily during dose escalation, and led to discontinuation of orforglipron in 10 to 17% of participants across dose cohorts. The safety profile of orforglipron was consistent with that of the GLP-1 receptor agonist class. CONCLUSIONS: Daily oral orforglipron, a nonpeptide GLP-1 receptor agonist, was associated with weight reduction. Adverse events reported with orforglipron were similar to those with injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists. (Funded by Eli Lilly; GZGI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05051579.).

Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a chronic disease that results in substantial global morbidity and mortality. The efficacy and safety of tirzepatide, a novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in people with obesity are not known. METHODS: In this phase 3 double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned 2539 adults with a body-mass index (BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 30 or more, or 27 or more and at least one weight-related complication, excluding diabetes, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-weekly, subcutaneous tirzepatide (5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg) or placebo for 72 weeks, including a 20-week dose-escalation period. Coprimary end points were the percentage change in weight from baseline and a weight reduction of 5% or more. The treatment-regimen estimand assessed effects regardless of treatment discontinuation in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean body weight was 104.8 kg, the mean BMI was 38.0, and 94.5% of participants had a BMI of 30 or higher. The mean percentage change in weight at week 72 was -15.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], -15.9 to -14.2) with 5-mg weekly doses of tirzepatide, -19.5% (95% CI, -20.4 to -18.5) with 10-mg doses, and -20.9% (95% CI, -21.8 to -19.9) with 15-mg doses and -3.1% (95% CI, -4.3 to -1.9) with placebo (P<0.001 for all comparisons with placebo). The percentage of participants who had weight reduction of 5% or more was 85% (95% CI, 82 to 89), 89% (95% CI, 86 to 92), and 91% (95% CI, 88 to 94) with 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg of tirzepatide, respectively, and 35% (95% CI, 30 to 39) with placebo; 50% (95% CI, 46 to 54) and 57% (95% CI, 53 to 61) of participants in the 10-mg and 15-mg groups had a reduction in body weight of 20% or more, as compared with 3% (95% CI, 1 to 5) in the placebo group (P<0.001 for all comparisons with placebo). Improvements in all prespecified cardiometabolic measures were observed with tirzepatide. The most common adverse events with tirzepatide were gastrointestinal, and most were mild to moderate in severity, occurring primarily during dose escalation. Adverse events caused treatment discontinuation in 4.3%, 7.1%, 6.2%, and 2.6% of participants receiving 5-mg, 10-mg, and 15-mg tirzepatide doses and placebo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this 72-week trial in participants with obesity, 5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg of tirzepatide once weekly provided substantial and sustained reductions in body weight. (Supported by Eli Lilly; SURMOUNT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04184622.).

Assessment and therapy of selected endocrine disorders.

Diabetes remains the most commonly encountered endocrinopathy with the incidence of type 2 doubling in the past decade. The prevalence of diabetes is projected to continue to increase dramatically over the next several decades unless major public health initiatives are successful in stemming this growth. Both type I and 2 diabetics more frequently require surgical and critical care than their non-diabetic counterparts. Type 1 and 2 diabetics also sustain greater peri-operative morbidity and mortality. Careful preoperative assessment and appropriate perioperative intervention may limit this. There is increasing evidence that maintenance of normal blood glucose in the perioperative period and during critical illness is beneficial for diabetic and non-diabetic patients. More data will hopefully be forthcoming to substantiate recent reports and identify the mechanisms of improved outcome. Thyroid disease remains a commonly encountered pathology that is more readily identified and controlled in the modern era of radioimmune assays of thyroid hormone and successful medical and surgical therapies. Severe hypothyroidism and thyroid storm are associated with significant increases in perioperative morbidity and mortality. Recognition of these entities or those at risk for developing them post operatively is crucial in initiating timely and effective therapy. Primary Al is uncommon, but results in glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid deficiency. Tertiary Al is far more common, most often secondary to iatrogenic therapy with exogenous glucocorticoids for the management of chronic diseases such as connective tissue disorders, anti-rejection regimes, and severe asthma. Glucocorticoid replacement or supplementation is needed on a case-by-case basis and should be individualized based on chronic steroid dose, duration, and stress of the surgical procedure. Perioperative steroid dosing regimes now recommend lower doses for shorter periods than previously suggested. More recently Al has been recognized in two populations, elderly patients undergoing major surgery and a subgroup of patients with septic shock. Timely diagnosis using synthetic ACTH stimulation testing and stress glucocorticoid, and possibly mineralocorticoid therapy, seems to reverse these processes and improve recovery. Although uncommon, patients with pheochromocytoma who undergo open or laparoscopic resections remain diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Perioperative outcome seems to have improved, in part, related to newer therapies and less invasive surgeries when indicated. The appropriate preoperative assessment and management of patients with various endocrinopathies is important to optimize outcome and limit avoidable complications. Hopefully additional evidence based guidelines will be forth-coming particularly in caring for the ever increasingly encountered perioperative diabetic.

Perioperative diabetic and hyperglycemic management issues.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: To review and discuss selected literature, expert opinion, and conventional care of the hyperglycemic perioperative or critically ill patient. MAIN POINTS: Diabetes mellitus, the most commonly encountered perioperative endocrinopathy, continues to increase dramatically in prevalence. Diabetes is the sixth most common cause of death in the United States and significantly affects other more common causes of death such as cardiac disease and stroke. Diabetic patients commonly have microvascular and macrovascular pathology that influences their perioperative course and critical illness and increases morbidity and mortality rates during hospitalization. Since diabetics require more surgeries and receive critical care more frequently than their nondiabetic counterparts, preemptive identification and anticipation of diabetic complications and comorbidities, along with an optimized treatment plan, are the foundation for the proper intensive care of this growing patient population. Hyperglycemia occurs commonly in critically ill diabetic patients but also is frequent in those who have a history of normal glucose homeostasis. The new onset of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients is driven by excessive counterregulatory stress hormone release and high tissue and circulating concentrations of inflammatory cytokines. Aggressive glycemic management improves short- and long-term outcomes in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiac surgical patients. Most recently, "tight" glycemic control in both diabetic and nondiabetic hyperglycemic intensive care unit patients resulted in improved survival in selected surgical patients without excessive consequences related to hypoglycemia. The mechanisms of benefit of euglycemia appear to be multifactorial. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 25% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit have previously diagnosed diabetes. Diabetics are most commonly admitted for treatment of complications of comorbid diseases. New-onset hyperglycemia also is common in critically ill patients, and it affects patient morbidity and mortality rates. A growing body of literature supports the benefits of tight glycemic control in certain patient populations. However, further data are needed about the optimal concentration of blood glucose, the role of maintaining euglycemia in a broader group of patients (including the medically critically ill), and the mechanisms of benefit of infused glucose and insulin.