Medical History Memorialized: The Origins and First Decade of the Canadian Bulletin of Medical History / Bulletin canadien d'histoire de la médecine (1979-94).

In 1979, the Canadian Society for the History of Medicine, founded in Quebec City, Canada, in 1950, inaugurated its first official organizational organ, Newsletter/Nouvelles, which ran for 10 issues in five annual volumes. In 1984, this modest means of institutional communication expanded to become the Canadian Bulletin of the History of Medicine / Bulletin canadien d'histoire de la médecine, a peer-reviewed journal that continues to the present. Central to the founding and operation of both publications was Kenneth B. Roberts of the Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland. This discussion outlines the foundation, evolution, and activities of both these periodicals from 1979 to 1994. Their relationship to the growth of both the Canadian Society for the History of Medicine and the field of medical history in Canada are also delineated.

The "Human Subject," "Vulnerable Populations," and Medical History: The Problem of Presentism and the Discourse of Bioethics.

This discussion considers recent historical works of eugenics and sterilization in Canada, but it is not an historiographic review essay or critique per se of this literature. Rather, by focussing on the topic of historic diagnostic categories such as "feeble-minded," "idiot," and "moron," methodological issues such as historical presentism and its possible interactions with the discourse of modern bioethics are examined. The conclusions derived are meant only to be cautionary, and are neither prescriptive nor proscriptive. Medical historians undertaking analyses of currently contentious topics that may directly involve or indirectly allude to "human subjects" or "vulnerable populations" perhaps ought to reflect on the degree, if any, they may be anachronistically writing contemporary bioethical categories into bygone eras.

The "Human Subject," "Vulnerable Populations," and Medical History: The Problem of Presentism and the Discourse of Bioethics.

This discussion considers recent historical works of eugenics and sterilization in Canada, but it is not an historiographic review essay or critique per se of this literature. Rather, by focussing on the topic of historic diagnostic categories such as "feeble-minded," "idiot," and "moron," methodological issues such as historical presentism and its possible interactions with the discourse of modern bioethics are examined. The conclusions derived are meant only to be cautionary, and are neither prescriptive nor proscriptive. Medical historians undertaking analyses of currently contentious topics that may directly involve or indirectly allude to "human subjects" or "vulnerable populations" perhaps ought to reflect on the degree, if any, they may be anachronistically writing contemporary bioethical categories into bygone eras.

Realizing Major William Borden's dream: military medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, and its wounded warriors, 1909-2009: an essay review.

This essay review examines three books dealing with the founding and subsequent activities of Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) and the evolution of military medicine from 1909 to 2009 recently published by the US Army's Borden Institute. Established by fellow army doctor William Borden to honor Walter Reed himself, WRAMC, located in Washington, DC, soon became the public and professional face of medical care for American soldiers. The discussion highlights the ongoing issue of the care and treatment of combat amputees; aspects of gender within military medicine; and WRAMC's function as an educational and research facility. Also discussed are the archival and documentary bases for these books and their utility for historians. Complimentary analysis of two of the books which are, in particular, explicitly about the history of WRAMC is contextualized within the celebration of the centennial of this army post contemporaneously with its closure, amalgamation, and relocation primarily to Maryland.

Clinical decision-making as the basis for assessing agreement between measures of the International Normalized Ratio.

BACKGROUND: The now classic approach of Bland and Altman is often used to assess the level of agreement between International Normalized Ratio (INR) measures. However, we are concerned that this method does not define agreement in a clinically meaningful way. Agreement between measures should be characterized explicitly in terms of clinical decisions that result from INR measures. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an extension of the Bland-Altman method to assess agreement between INR measures, based explicitly on the way clinicians make decisions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a clinically based graphical method to estimate the level of agreement between measures of INR. We identified clinically relevant INR ranges using epidemiologic and clinical evidence regarding risk and expected outcome at different INR ranges. Clinical decisions were expected to agree within these INR ranges and, therefore, the ranges became the basis for establishing agreement between measures. We used paired INR measures and resultant clinical decisions measured during a previous prospective study to validate and compare the accuracy of our model to those of Bland and Altman's and other published models. Our method more accurately predicts when warfarin dosing decisions differ than the Bland-Altman method (P < 0.02). Our method is also superior to other published methods, particularly at the important task of identifying when measures lead to discrepant clinical decisions. CONCLUSIONS: We introduced and validated an improvement of the Bland-Altman method to assess agreement between INR measures. Our model is superior because it is based explicitly on factors that influence clinical decision-making.

Being Lister: ethos and Victorian medical discourse.

Stylistic analysis and rhetorical theory are used in this study to inform our understanding of impediments to the successful uptake of a new medical idea. Through examination of the work of the Victorian surgeon Joseph Lister, who was described by one biographer as suffering from "stylistic ham-handedness", the study provides insights into the difficulty that Lister had in explaining his theory of antiseptic surgery. Using three comparisons-Lister's scientific style in public discourse with that of his students, and Lister's scientific style in private discourse with those of both a surbordinate and a superior-the study suggests that the rhetorical concept of ethos played a major role in his communication difficulties. In this way, it presents a more nuanced perspective on modern presentations of "model" communications versus communication failures: that is, that problematic written discourse offers as useful a heuristic device as does exemplary discourse.

Striving to do good things: teaching humanities in Canadian medical schools.

We provide the results of a systematic key-informant review of medical humanities curricula at fourteen of Canada's seventeen medical schools. This survey was the first of its kind. We found a wide diversity of views among medical educators as to what constitutes the medical humanities, and a lack of consensus on how best to train medical students in the field. In fact, it is not clear that consensus has been attempted - or is even desirable - given that Canadian medical humanities programs are largely shaped by individual educators' interests, experience and passions. This anarchic approach to teaching the medical humanities contrasts sharply with teaching in the clinical sciences where national accreditation processes attempt to ensure that doctors graduating from different schools have roughly the same knowledge (or at least have passed the same exams). We argue that medical humanities are marginalized in Canadian curricula because they are considered to be at odds philosophically with the current dominant culture of evidence-based medicine (EBM). In such a culture where adhering to a consensual standard is a measure of worth, the medical humanities - which defy easy metrical appraisal - are vulnerable. We close with a plea for medical education to become more comfortable in the borderlands between EBM and humanities approaches.

Male sexual function improves after ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

PURPOSE: Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis has become the gold standard surgical therapy for the majority of patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis. However sexual functional disturbances after this procedure can be a concern for patients. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine the outcome of sexual-function related quality of life in male patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-two male patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis between 1995 and 2000 were evaluated by the validated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scoring instrument. This index scale examines sexual function in five categories. These are erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction. The IIEF instrument was administered after surgery and then scores before and after RP/IPAA were evaluated and compared. The significance of age at the time of the surgery, type of surgery, type of anastomotic technique (mucosectomy vs stapled) and septic complications on sexual functional outcome were also investigated. RESULTS: Mean age at the time of the surgery was 39.9 +/- 11.5 years. The mean follow-up period (time between pouch surgery and IIEF completed) was 3.6 +/- 1.8 years. There was statistically significant improvement in 4 of 5 categories of sexual function (erectile function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction) where patients had improved scores after surgery compared to prior to surgery. The mean erectile function score increased pre to post surgery by 2.12 points (P = 0.02), which indicates better sexual results. Anastomotic technique and septic complication did not influence the results, however, older age had a negative impact on results. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some adverse sexual functions, male patients who undergo RP/IPAA for the surgical management of their colitis may preserve or improve their overall sexual functional outcome.

Human defensin 5 expression in intestinal metaplasia of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal tract intestinal metaplasia (IM) is termed Barrett's oesophagus (BO) or gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM), depending on its location. BO and GIM are associated with chemical exposure resulting from gastro-oesophageal reflux and chronic Helicobacter pylori infection, respectively. Paneth cells (PCs), characterised by cytoplasmic eosinophilic granules, are found in a subset of IM at these sites, but histology may not accurately detect them. AIM: To determine human defensin 5 (HD5; an antimicrobial peptide produced by PCs) expression in BO and GIM, and to investigate its association with H pylori infection. METHODS: Endoscopic biopsies from 33 patients with BO and 51 with GIM, and control tissues, were examined by routine histology and for H pylori infection and HD5 mRNA and protein expression. RESULTS: In normal tissues, HD5 expression was specific for PCs in the small intestine. Five patients with BE and 42 with GIM expressed HD5, but few HD5 expressing cells in IM had the characteristic histological features of PCs. Most HD5 positive specimens were H pylori infected and most HD5 negative specimens were not infected. CONCLUSIONS: HD5 immunohistochemistry was often positive in IM when PCs were absent by conventional histology. Thus, HD5 immunohistochemistry may be superior to histology for identifying metaplastic PCs and distinguishing GIM from BO. The higher frequency of HD5 expression in GIM than in BO is associated with a higher frequency of H pylori infection, suggesting that in IM PCs may form part of the mucosal antibacterial response.

Benefits of 'clean sweep' in Peutz-Jeghers patients.

OBJECTIVE: Laparotomy is the treatment of choice in Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS) patients for endoscopically irretrievable symptomatic polyps and polyp-related complications. During the last decade, we have operated on majority of the PJS patients with the purpose of removing all the gastrointestinal polyps (clean sweep), when an operation was indicated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of clean sweep technique on the need for repeated surgery compared to a problem focused approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with PJS treated in our institution since 1964 were studied. They were placed into two groups; those who had a problem-focused operation and those who were operated with the purpose of removing all small and large intestinal polyps. Demographics, presentation, follow-up period and the need for recurrent surgery were compared. RESULTS: We identified 11 patients (4 males, 7 females). Eight patients (5 females; median age 18.5) had problem-focused surgery for bleeding-anaemia (n = 3) or obstruction-intussusception (n = 5). These patients required 23 further operations within 87 patient-follow-up-years (2.64 operations per 10 years). Three patients (2 females; median age 6) were operated for bleeding-anaemia (n = 1) or obstruction-intussusception (n = 2) using the 'clean sweep' approach. These patients did not require any further surgery within 21 patient-follow-up-years. The gender, presentation and follow-up periods were similar between the groups. However, the 'clean sweep' technique appears to have reduced the need for further operations when it is compared with problem-focused approach (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: To reduce the need for abdominal surgery and consequent problems in PJS patients, an attempt to remove all detected polyps (clean sweep technique) may be beneficial in these patients.

The utility of the 13C-galactose breath test as a measure of liver function.

BACKGROUND: The 13C-galactose breath test has been reported to be an accurate, non-invasive method for the assessment of liver function. AIMS: To determine the optimal doses of labelled and unlabelled carrier galactose necessary to perform the 13C-galactose breath test, to assess the utility of the 13C-galactose breath test in distinguishing between normal subjects and those with liver cirrhosis and to determine whether the 13C-galactose breath test can stratify patients with cirrhosis based on their Child-Pugh score. METHODS: Twenty-three control subjects and 30 patients with liver cirrhosis received fixed doses of unlabelled carrier galactose and labelled 13C-galactose. Breath samples were collected just before and at 30-min intervals up to 4 h after the ingestion of unlabelled carrier galactose and labelled 13C-galactose. Each sample was analysed for its 13CO2 content. RESULTS: Doses of 25 g/m2 of unlabelled carrier galactose and 100 mg of 13C-galactose had the greatest sensitivity (93%; 95% confidence interval, 76-99%) and specificity (87%; 95% confidence interval, 65-97%) for distinguishing between normal subjects and cirrhotics when the test was performed 2 h after ingestion. The 13C-galactose breath test was also able to distinguish between class A and class B or C cirrhotics. CONCLUSION: The 13C-galactose breath test is a useful non-invasive tool for distinguishing between healthy subjects and patients with liver cirrhosis and between cirrhotics with well-compensated liver disease and those with decompensated liver disease.