[Implementation, of multidisciplinary consultations for patients with inflammatory arthritis and treated with subcutaneous biologic DMARDs: Assessment at one year and outlook]. / Mise en place de consultations pluridisciplinaires pour des patients atteints de rhumatisme inflammatoire chronique et traités par biothérapie sous-cutanée : bilan à un an et perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Biologics (bDMARDs) have revolutionized the prognosis of patients with inflammatory arthritis, but are not without serious side effects. The patient must be able to identify them, acquire self-care abilities or skills and adhere to their treatment. Multidisciplinary consultations, including a pharmaceutical consultation could improve the care of these patients. The pharmaceutical presence make it easier to switch to a biosimilar with etended patient support thanks to the community-hospital network. The return on investment is possible thanks to the more frequent use of biosimilars and the pricing of this type of consultation by the "Forfait de Prestation Intermédiaire". METHODOLOGY: Eligible patients are patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis, treated with subcutaneous bDMARDs. The criteria assessed were patient's knowledge of their biotherapy using the Biosecure score, their medication adherence using the CQR-5, the total of switch to biosimilars perform and the financial statement of the consultations. An assessment of the actions deployed for the community-hospital network. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-five patients (47.4%) benefited multidisciplinary consultation. The mean score of the Biosecure score was 69.6/100 (moderate knowledge) and 261 patients (88.5%) were highly adherent. 57 patients (73%) accepted the switch to biosimilar. 197 pharmacy were contacted, all of witch for patients who receive the switch. Overall patient's satisfaction was 26.9/28. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary consultations with involvement of the pharmacist should optimized patient care and the management of outpatients treated with bDMARDs. Patients have already expressed their satisfaction with this course of care and the return on investment is positive.

Characteristics of Pharmacists' Interventions Related to Proton-Pump Inhibitors in French Hospitals: An Observational Study.

Methods: The study was based on a retrospective analysis of pharmacist interventions for DRPs detected during the medication order review and documented into the French Act-IP© database over a 12-year period. DRPs and PIs were analyzed, and independent factors of physician acceptance were assessed via multiple logistic regression. Results: Out of the 620,620 PIs registered, 29,694 targeted a PPI (4.8%). PPI's DRPs were mostly related to the prescription of a "drug not available at the hospital" (26.1%) and a "drug use without indication" (18.3%); PIs were mostly "drug switch" (35.9%) and "drug discontinuation" (26.1%). In all, 18,919 PIs were accepted by physicians (63.7%). Acceptance was significantly associated with patient age: less accepted for the 18-75 years group (OR = 0.59, 95 CI [0.46-0.76]), and the >75 years group (OR = 0.57, 95 CI [0.44-0.73]) vs. <18 years group; for the type of DRP, "drug use without indication" was the less accepted (OR = 0.73, 95 CI [0.63-0.85]); for the type of PI, "dose adjustment" was the less accepted (OR = 0.32, 95 CI [0.23-0.45]). Conclusion: Pharmacists contribute to preventing DRPs associated with PPI prescriptions during the medication order review process. Moreover, they often detect PPIs used without indication and they propose drug discontinuation, which contributes to the PPI deprescribing process. PIs should be further developed in the future to reduce PPI overprescription.

[Improvement of knowledge of patients treated with an oral anticoagulant after a pharmaceutical interview at the hospital]. / Amélioration des connaissances des patients traités par un anticoagulant oral après avoir bénéficié d'un entretien pharmaceutique à l'hôpital.

OBJECTIVES: Patients treated with oral anticoagulants need an adapted education in order to optimize the management of these treatments. The objective was to assess the knowledge of patients before and after a pharmaceutical interview carried out by pharmacy students on digital tablets at the hospital. METHODS: A prospective study took place in the cardiology department, with a first phase from December 2016 to June 2018. Patient's knowledge were assessed during a pharmaceutical interview; additional informations were done for unacquired concepts. The second phase took place in October 2018, and patient's knowledge were assessed during a phone call for patients who had at least given one wrong answer on the four selected questions. RESULTS: Sixty-eight and twenty-two patients were included respectively for phases 1 and 2 (mean age=70±3.4; treatments number=8.2±0.9). 36 patients were treated by Vitamin K antagonists and 32 by direct oral anticoagulants. 57% of patients with oral anticoagulants gave a good answer for principles of the treatment and the surveillance during phase 1, and 33% for signs of overdose. A significant improvement for the 22 patients with poor knowledge was observed in phase 2 (1.73 vs. 2.5; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The playful interview improves the patient's knowledge over time. Developing the relationship between the hospital and community pharmacists would allow us to optimize the patient follow-up.

Assessing the benefit of the 72-hour antibiotic therapy reassessment documentation.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the documentation of the 72-hour antibiotic therapy reassessment in medical records. METHODS: One-day prevalence evaluation of curative antibiotic therapies≥72hours. The documentation of the reassessment was defined according to three criteria: (1) "clear" documentation (clinical or microbiological comment associated with a comment on the need to adjust the antibiotic therapy or on the lack of need); (2) "tacit" documentation (only based on a clinical or microbiological comment); (3) no documentation. RESULTS: We assessed 114 antibiotic therapies in 26 hospital departments. A clear reassessment at 72hours was observed in only 45 (39%) records and 31 (27%) records had no reassessment. The planned duration of treatment was written in 63 (55%) records. At 72hours, among the 71 antibiotic therapies with a microbiological documentation, 69 (97%) were active and 44 (62%) had a narrow spectrum. Among the 48 antibiotic therapies with a broad spectrum on day 1, only 21 (44%) benefited from a de-escalation at 72hours. A clearly recorded reassessment at 72hours was associated with de-escalation (P=0.025) and the prescription of a planned duration of treatment was associated with antibiotic therapy compliance with local or national guidelines (P=0.018). CONCLUSION: Although reassessment was observed in 73% of records, it was correctly recorded at 72hours in only 39% of cases. The documentation of the reassessment and the prescription of a planned duration were associated with a better quality of antibiotic prescription (de-escalation, compliance with guidelines) and are relevant indicators for monitoring the proper use of antibiotics.

Validation of a tool for reporting pharmacists' interventions in everyday community pharmacy.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The French Society of Clinical Pharmacy (SFPC) asked a group of experts to adapt the SFPC hospital pharmacists' interventions reporting tool for use in community pharmacy practice. This study aimed to develop and validate a tool for the routine reporting of pharmacists' interventions in French community settings. METHODS: Two groups of community pharmacists coded reports of 60 typical pharmacists' interventions. One group was "experts" (n = 4) who had participated in the development of the tool (internal validation) and the other were "external" community pharmacists (n = 6), naïve to the tool (external validation). The Kappa coefficient was used to assess the inter-reliability of classification between participants. A 4-level Likert scale was used to evaluate ease of use and acceptability. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The tool we developed for recording and classifying PIs has 19 items; 11 non-ordered categories describing drug-related problems; and 7 items describing interventions. Two tables of definitions were provided to help community pharmacists in the classification. The mean κ statistic was (i) 0.63 for experts and 0.73 for external community pharmacists in categorizing drug-related problems and (ii) 0.69 for experts and 0.75 for external community pharmacists in categorizing interventions. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: A specific tool for the documentation of pharmacists' interventions in community pharmacies is now available in French. Besides being useful to describe pharmacists' interventions in studies in community settings, it can be used to document the pharmaceutical patient record and to support the traceability process.

[How to act when an alpha-blocker is associated with a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4]. / Conduite à tenir en cas d'association d'un alpha-bloquant et d'un inhibiteur puissant du cytochrome 3A4.

OBJECTIVE: Combination of alpha-blockers with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors is either contra-indicated or not recommended. We searched data supporting this classification and guiding prescribers when such an interaction occurs. METHODS: We analyzed reports published by the French agency for drug safety, reference books and performed search in databases of pharmacokinetics studies and case or case series related with these interactions. RESULTS: The classification of the potential severity of these interactions defined by the French agency for drug safety evolved over time. Our literature search did not identify any cases or case series reporting serious clinical consequences of such interactions and no pharmacoepidemiological studies on the association between alpha-blockers and inhibitors of CYP3A4. The content of the summaries of product characteristics indicate that the combination of ketoconazole with alfuzosin, silodosin and tamsulosin increases the area under the curve of the alpha-blocker 3 fold. CONCLUSION: Data demonstrating the clinical consequences of an association between alpha-blocker and a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor are lacking. The 3 fold increase of the area under the curve for alfuzosin, silodosin and tamsulosin associated with ketoconazole while the association with the two first is contra-indicated and is not recommended with the third raises questions. This lack of data leaves doctors and pharmacists in a situation of uncertainty on how to proceed when such an interaction occurs.

[Clinical pharmacist influence at hospital to prevent overdosed prescription of acetaminophen]. / Impact du pharmacien clinicien à l'hôpital pour prévenir les posologies supra-thérapeutiques du paracétamol.

OBJECTIVES: The recommended daily dose of acetaminophen is limited to 60mg/kg/day with a maximum of 3g daily dose in adults weighing less than 50kg or in patients undergoing certain risk factors. This study aimed at assessing the fulfillment of those recommendations and the possible impact on the liver dysfunction at supra-therapeutic doses of acetaminophen. METHODS: This study was performed one day in 9 services. Patients characteristics, acetaminophen dose, daily dose administered, physiopathological aspects, markers of liver damage were collected. RESULTS: Among 542 prescriptions analyzed, 343 of them contained acetaminophen. The median age of patients studied was 81 years and one third weighed less than 50kg. The main risk factor of supra-therapeutic prescriptions was the lack of dose acetaminophen based on weight with 14% patients concerned and this risk raised at 17% when the pathophysiological conditions were included. The presence of pharmacists in medicals departments was more effective than the use of informatics programs limiting the dose systematically to 3g/day, or a distant pharmaceutical validation from care services to reduce the risk of acetaminophen overdose. According to the statement of administrations, only 4 of 49 patients received doses above 60mg/kg/day with a low impact on liver function tests. CONCLUSION: The continuous presence in pharmaceutical care services was the most effective measure to ensure effective implementation of acetaminophen recommendations.

Trends in pharmacists' medication order review in French hospitals from 2006 to 2009: analysis of pharmacists' interventions from the Act-IP© website observatory.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: The French Society of Clinical Pharmacy has developed a website, named Act-IP©, enabling hospital pharmacists to document and analyse pharmacists' interventions (PIs) proposed during medication order review when a drug-related problem is detected. This study analyses PIs documented in Act-IP© and assesses factors associated with physicians' acceptance of PIs. METHODS: PIs documented into Act-IP© over a 30-month period were analysed. Independent predictors of physicians' acceptance were assessed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 34,522 PIs were registered by 201 pharmacists working in 59 hospitals. PIs were mostly related to 'dose adjustment' (25%), 'drug discontinuation' (20%) and 'drug switch' (19%). Of the 43,343 medications involved, 28% targeted drugs acting on the central nervous system, 17% anti-infective drugs and 16% cardiovascular drugs. Sixty-eight per cent of PIs were accepted by physicians (15% refusals and 17% non-assessable). Physicians' acceptance was significantly associated with 1/ drug group: antineoplastics and immunomodulators (OR = 2.29, CI 95[1.94-2.69]), anti-infectives (OR = 1.19, CI 95 [1.11-1.28]); 2/ type of intervention: drug switch (OR = 1.54, CI 95 [1.43-1.65]), drug discontinuation (OR = 1.38, CI 95 [1.29-1.48]), administration modality optimization (OR = 1.19, CI 95 [1.11-1.29]), addition of a new drug (OR = 1.12, CI 95 [1.00-1.24]); 3/ ward specialty: paediatrics (OR = 1.83, CI 95 [1.24-2.70]) and intensive care (OR = 1.34, CI 95 [1.10-1.64]); 4/ level of pharmacist integration in the ward: higher when the pharmacist is regularly in the ward compared with occasionally (OR = 0.74, CI 95 [0.70-0.79]) or never (OR = 0.68, CI 95 [0.60-0.75]) present. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This study highlights the role of routine pharmacist review of medication orders to prevent drug-related problems and gives new insights for a successful collaboration between physicians and pharmacists.

[Pharmacists' interventions conducted by hospital pharmacists on psychotropic drugs pharmacotherapy]. / Interventions pharmaceutiques émises par les pharmaciens sur les médicaments psychotropes.

INTRODUCTION: The French Society of Clinical Pharmacy (SFPC) through the special interest group "standardization and optimization of clinical pharmacy activities" stated that the study of pharmacists' interventions (PIs) conducted during prescription analysis was a priority. The SFPC developed an internet website named Act-IP(®) (http://www.sfpc.eu/fr/) where French speaking pharmacists were able to document PIs using a normalized codification. The objective of this study was to analyze medication-related problems linked to psychotropic drugs in hospital and to investigate PIs performed during prescription analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective, observational study using PIs involving psychotropic medications recorded between September 2006 and February 2009 on the Act-IP(®) website. RESULTS: Four thousand six hundred and twenty PIs recorded by 165 pharmacists in 57 hospitals were related to psychotropic drugs. Patients concerned by these drug-related problems were 64 years old on average. Seven categories of medication-related problems represented more than 69% of PIs (1.1-Non Conformity of the drug choice compared to the formulary; 4.1 Supratherapeutic dose; 5.3 Therapeutic redundancy; 6.2 Drug interaction (all levels of severity); 7.0 Adverse drug reaction; 8.3 Inappropriate drug form; 8.5 Inappropriate timing of administration). The PIs related to 9.2 Patient's non compliance, 2.0 Untreated indication and 3.2 Length of the treatment too short were infrequent (less than 1%). The most common type of intervention was the dose adjustment. Almost 45% of these PIs involved Zopiclone or Zolpidem prescription in elderly patients. Seven hundred and nine drug interactions were identified by pharmacists. The most common type of drug interaction considered the risk of cardiac arrhythmias due to antipsychotic medications. One hundred and thirty-three PIs concerned adverse drug reaction. The most frequent adverse drug reactions were a fall (36 PIs), hemorrhage/bleeding (32 PIs), drowsiness (12 PIs) and extrapyramidal syndrome (12 PIs). Antidepressant drugs were the greatest pharmacological class concerning adverse drug reaction. The overall acceptance rate was 57%. Eight hundred and seventy-four PIs (19%) were refused and 1111 (24%) were non-assessable. DISCUSSION: PIs avoids drug-related problems, such as the polyprescription of benzodiazepine or supratherapeutic dose. However, few PIs concern compliance to therapy or polyprescription of antipsychotic drugs. These two categories of medication-related problems are known to be an issue in mental health therapy. The lack of guidelines describing mental health pathology (such as the HAS guideline) is an obstacle for performing evidence-based PIs. The lack of information describing the context of the prescription is a limitation of this study. In order to improve their practice, pharmacists have to focus more on the context in which patients are evolving, and to take into account its entire situation based on Anglo-Saxon approaches. A second way is to identify clinical settings where PIs are useful and to describe PIs needed. Doctors and pharmacists should get together and talk about these clinical situations and PIs, because some may be misunderstood or disapproved by prescribers. This collaboration could take the form of a thesaurus combining clinical situation and PIs. CONCLUSION: It appears important for pharmacists to show their daily involvement in the quality of medical care. This feedback on medication problems encountered and PIs proposed should help prescribers to identify clinical situations at risk. Nevertheless, this study also suggests that progress is possible. Dialogue must allow pharmacists and physicians to delete misunderstandings about their practices.

[Evaluation of the impact of a training program on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) implemented by pharmacy students aiming at improving the knowledge of patients receiving vitamin K antagonists during their hospital clinical training course]. / Évaluation de l'impact d'un programme de formation aux antagonistes de la vitamine K (AVK) pour les étudiants en pharmacie sur l'amélioration des connaissances des patients traités par AVK pris en charge au cours de leur stage clinique hospitalier.

INTRODUCTION: We developed a training program for pharmacy students aiming at supporting patients receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective was to estimate how the program impacts VKA-treated patient knowledge acquisition and/or improvement on their anticoagulant treatment. METHOD: Using dedicated tools, pharmacy students received education on VKA treatment. Once appointed to clinical wards of Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, they were in charge of evaluating patient's knowledge on VKA treatment before and after training. Evaluation was conducted using a face-to-face standardized interview (14-item questionnaire). A global score was calculated for each patient. An univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify potential variables influencing score result. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy VKA-treated patients were recruited in seven hospitals for evaluation of their knowledge on VKA treatment and on clinical at risk situations. Before intervention, patients obtained an average score of 12.3±3.2 (maximum: 18). Factors significantly associated with the score were possession of a VKA information booklet, VKA treatment duration, treatment initiation and age. Fifty-two patients with a low score were further trained by the pharmacy student. After intervention, their initial score was improved significantly, from 9.9±3.3 to 13.5±2.3 (P<0.0001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Increasing patient knowledge is a way to decrease the rate of adverse effects. This study demonstrates that patients with primary poor knowledge improved it significantly thanks to pharmacy students' intervention. This may contribute to lower the VKA-associated risk of adverse events and consequently to the improvement of patients quality of life and healthcare expenditures.

Pharmacists' interventions on intravenous to oral conversion for potassium.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend use of the oral route whenever possible to treat or prevent hypokalemia. Although a myriad of papers have been published regarding intravenous to oral (IV to PO) therapy conversion programs and about clinical pharmacy services provided in hospitals, little is known on the role of hospital pharmacists in promoting the oral route for potassium administration. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to describe the frequency of interventions related to IV to PO potassium therapy conversions performed by hospital pharmacists. Setting French hospitals recording pharmacist's interventions on the website tool of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy. METHODS: From the pharmacist's interventions (PI) dataset recorded we extracted all interventions related to potassium IV to PO conversion. We assessed the acceptance rate of these PI by prescribers. Additional free text information in the dataset was analysed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IV to PO potassium therapy conversions related to potassium chloride. RESULTS: From January 2007 to December 2010, 87 hospitals recorded 1,868 PIs concerning IV to PO therapy conversion. Among these, 16 (<1 %) concerned potassium chloride. They were recorded by four hospitals (4.6 %) with respectively 12, 2, 1 and 1 PIs. Six PIs were accepted by physicians and the prescriptions were modified. CONCLUSION: PIs to promote the administration of potassium by the oral route are extremely rare. Our results and scarce previously published data reveal that this field of practice remains almost unexplored. These findings highlight an important gap in the field of intravenous to oral therapy programs. This situation must be regarded as unsatisfactory and should lead to setting up more education and research programs.

Overdosed paracetamol (acetaminophen) prescriptions and subsequent pharmacist interventions in French hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the manner in which hospital pharmacists intervene for overdosed paracetamol prescriptions. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the number and nature of pharmacists' interventions (PIs) for overdosed paracetamol adult prescriptions in hospitals. METHODS: We studied PIs that had been documented by pharmacists on the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy website tool between 2007 and 2010. We identified PIs that were related to paracetamol-containing prescriptions of one brand name only (type 1) particularly for patients with body weight ≤ 50 kg who were prescribed 4 g/day, and PIs that concerned the co-prescription of two paracetamol-containing products (type 2). RESULTS: Among 60 hospitals, seven did not report any paracetamol overdose-related PIs. Of the 53 hospitals that had at least one PI, 16 did not report any type 1 PIs. Bodyweight, liver disease, cirrhosis and chronic alcoholism were absent recorded criterion by most of the hospitals included in this study. DISCUSSION: Previously published studies have highlighted that the most frequent PIs are type 1, especially for patients whose body weight is ≤ 50 kg. We observed a broad variability in the number or type of PI that were related to overdosed paracetamol prescriptions compared with the total of all recorded types of PI. These data suggest that a significant number of hospital pharmacists are unaware of the risks that adult patients with low body weight are exposed to when receiving four grams paracetamol/day over several days. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist educational programs are needed.

[Opportunities for medication errors and pharmacist's interventions in the context of computerized prescription order entry: a review of data published by French hospital pharmacists]. / Opportunités d'erreurs médicamenteuses et interventions pharmaceutiques dans le cadre de la prescription informatisée : revue des données publiées par les pharmaciens hospitaliers français.

INTRODUCTION: Computerized prescription order entry (CPOE) is accelerating in France. CPOE has been shown to reduce the occurrence of some medication errors, but evidence of a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes remains limited. In some cases, new error types have arisen with its use. The aim of this study was to investigate the French data on the nature and frequency of medication errors opportunities generated by the computer use, which led pharmacists to alert prescribers. METHODS: We performed a search on PubMed and CAT-INIST databases completed by a manual one. RESULTS: Ten publications, 11 abstracts and three personal communications were analysed. As part of the analysis of computerized prescriptions, the rate of pharmaceutical interventions due to CPOE ranges from 5.9 to 35% depending on the study. Duplicate orders, unit errors, the use of free text, parameterization flaws and poor usability of software are probably the root of many prescribing errors. Errors generated by the tool can have serious potential consequences. DISCUSSION: Pharmacist's interventions due to CPOE are common. It is not known whether variability of the percentage of pharmacist's interventions is due to software used or to conditions by witch studies were carried out. With implementation of CPOE in hospital, pharmacists must acquire new knowledge and new skills in order to prevent prescription errors generated by these tools and its misuse. CONCLUSION: Studies are urgently needed in order to identify the safest tools and to discard the most dangerous.

[Designing a tool to describe drug interactions and adverse events for learning and clinical routine]. / Développement d'un outil d'aide à la description des interactions et des effets indésirables médicamenteux pour la formation et la routine clinique.

Pharmacists play an important role in prescription analysis. They are involved in therapeutic drug monitoring, particularly for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, prevention and management of drug interactions, and may be called in to identify side effects and adverse events related to drug therapy. For the polymedicated patient, the medical file, the list of prescribed drugs and the history of their administration may be insufficient to adequately assign the responsibility of a given adverse effect to one or more drugs. Graphical representations can sometimes be useful to describe and clarify a sequence of events. In addition, as part of their academic course, students have many occasions to hear about "side effects" and "drug interactions". However, in the academic setting, there are few opportunities to observe the evolution and the consequences of these events. In the course of their hospital training, these students are required to perform patient follow-up for pharmacotherapeutic or educational purposes and to comment case reports to physicians. The aim of this paper is to present a tool facilitating the graphic display of drug interaction consequences and side effects. This tool can be a useful aid for causality assessment. It structures the students' training course and helps them better understand the commentaries pharmacists provide for physicians. Further development of this tool should contribute to the prevention of adverse drug events.

The relationship between introduction of American society of clinical oncology guidelines and the use of colony-stimulating factors in clinical practice in a Paris university hospital.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are issued periodically by professional medical societies or committees to assist practitioners in clinical decision making. However, it is unclear whether such guidelines have any lasting impact on clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines regarding use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSF) on cancer care in a university hospital in Paris. METHODS: The study was performed at Hjpital Tenon, an 830-bed university hospital in Paris, in 1996 and 1997, both before and after the ASCO guidelines were implemented. The guidelines were first disseminated as a continuing medical education program and then actively implemented using a CSF prescription order form summarizing the guidelines. This form had to be used during the patient consultation and was sent to the Hjpital Tenon pharmacy for CSF dispensation. Even if CSF use did not comply with the ASCO guidelines, the pharmacy filled the prescription. Seven other university hospitals in Paris, where the ASCO guidelines were not actively implemented, comprised the control group. The main outcome measure was the proportion of prescriptions in compliance with the 1996 update of the ASCO guidelines. Secondary outcome measures were the proportions of prescriptions in compliance with ASCO guidelines regarding primary prophylactic, secondary prophylactic, and therapeutic CSF administration. RESULTS: Before implementation of the ASCO guidelines, CSF use in compliance with the guidelines was 39% (41/105) at the study site and 31% (16/51) at the control sites (P > 0.05). Six months after dissemination and implementation of the guidelines, the proportion of CSF prescriptions complying with ASCO guidelines increased significantly versus baseline (P = 0.003) in the study group, to 61% (50/82). However, even after the guidelines were implemented, compliance with guidelines on primary prophylactic CSF administration did not change significantly versus before implementation in the study group (12% [5/41] before implementation vs 6% [2/33] after implementation; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest an association between the active implementation strategy (continuing medical education and CSF prescription reminder form) and physician compliance with the ASCO guidelines. Implementation of the ASCO guidelines appears to have had some impact on medical practice.

Effect of multifaceted intervention promoting early switch from intravenous to oral acetaminophen for postoperative pain: controlled, prospective, before and after study.

PROBLEM: Need to improve the efficiency of postoperative pain management by early switching from intravenous to oral acetaminophen. DESIGN: Implementation of local guidelines aimed at improving nurses' and doctors' behaviour. A controlled, prospective, before and after study evaluated its impact on appropriateness and costs. BACKGROUND AND SETTING: Orthopaedic surgery department (intervention) and all other surgical departments (control) of a university hospital. Five anaesthetists and 30 nurses of orthopaedic department participated in study. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Reducing number of acetaminophen injections per patient, reducing consumption of acetaminophen injections; cost savings over a one year period. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Multifaceted intervention included a local consensus process, short educational presentation, poster displayed in all nurses' offices, and feedback of practices six months after implementation of guidelines. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Mean number of acetaminophen injections per patient decreased from 6.81 before intervention to 2.36 six months after. Monthly consumption of acetaminophen injections per 100 patients decreased by 320.9 (95% confidence interval 192.4 to 449.4) in intervention department and remained unchanged in control departments. Annual cost reduction was projected to be pound 15,100. LESSONS LEARNT: Simple and locally implemented guidelines can improve practices and cut costs. Educational interventions can improve professionals' behaviour when they are based on actual working practices, use interactive techniques such as discussion groups, and are associated with other effective implementation strategies.

Multicenter study of the impact of prescription guidelines on the use of colony stimulating factors.

The aim of this work was to assess the impact of circulating guidelines for correct prescription practices of colony stimulating factors (CSF). Two hospital groups were compared, a 'guidelines' group (seven teaching hospitals) that circulated the guidelines and a control group (eight teaching hospitals) that did not. In addition, two periods were compared before and after distribution of the guidelines: from 17 February to 2 March 1996 and from 17 February to 2 March 1997. The assessment involved compliance with the guidelines for the following parameters: indications, dose regimen, time to start of CSF therapy and duration of CSF therapy between the control and guideline groups and also between the two periods. The population included 404 patients analyzed (209 in 1996 and 195 in 1997) for the indication of post-chemotherapy neutropenia. Total compliance in the first period (all four items) was 44.2% in the control group and 50.8% in the guideline group (nonsignificant), and during the second period was 31.9 and 59.6% in the two groups (p<0.001). During the first period, the differences in compliance with the guidelines for indication, dose regimen, time to start of treatment and duration between the groups were not significant. In the second period, this difference became significant and in favor of the guideline group for dose regimen (p = 0.009) and treatment duration (p = 0.02). The results of this study show the need to continuously define prescription reference systems according to available data, and to circulate them widely to improve the quality of health care and to control expenses.

[Prevention of venous thromboembolism in a non-surgical medical ward. Proposed indications for low molecular weight heparin]. / Prévention de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse en milieu hospitalier non chirurgical. Propositions d'indications des héparines de bas poids moléculaire.

OBJECTIVE: The efficiency of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) has not been established in non surgical patients, so their official preventive use has been limited in France since 1995 to surgery. However, a survey conducted in 5 university hospitals in non surgical patients showed that 21-29% of patients still received a LMWH prescription. It seemed necessary to define the medical conditions for which the practical use of these heparins would be justified. We contacted external experts to obtain a consensus by using the Delphi method. METHODS: The Delphi method, created by the "Rand Corporation" in the USA and used in medicine since the nineteen seventies, is based on a light logistic, with questionnaires been sent by mail with a feed-back report A total of 48 experts were chosen by local staff teams in the 5 hospitals. For the 3 rounds, from March to October 1998, questions were devised by a multicentred staff team. RESULTS: Among the 48 experts contacted, 32 completed the 3 questionnaires, 7 of them did for 2, and 43 did for at least one questionnaire. The experts first defined a list of 12 risk or high risk situations and 11 aggravating factors. For any high risk situation, prescription is justified. For other cases, 2 risk situations are required, or one risk situation with at least 2 aggravating factors, to justify a prescription. If no risk situation is present, prescription is, according to experts, usually not justified. CONCLUSION: The maximal agreement defines the situations in which one use of low molecular weight heparins is proposed to prevent deep venous thrombosis in non surgical inpatients, in most current hospital situations and for more than 24 hours of hospitalization. Clinical trials are needed, to validate their effectiveness and define the optimal dose in these indications. To date, epidemiological studies should be conducted to evaluate the experts proposals by estimating risk factors for deep venous thrombosis.