Comparison of Ultrasound and Electrical Stimulation Guidance for Onabotulinum Toxin-A Injections: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Background: Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection is an established therapy for limb spasticity and focal limb dystonia. Comparative benefits of injection guidance procedures have not been rigorously studied. Objectives: We compared 2 targeting techniques for onabotulinumtoxin-A (onabotA) injection for the treatment of focal hand dystonia and upper limb spasticity: electrophysiologic guidance using electrical stimulation (E-stim) and ultrasound (US). Methods: This was a 2-center, randomized, crossover, assessor-blinded trial. Participants with focal hand dystonia or upper limb spasticity, on stable onabotA therapy for at least 2 previous injection cycles, were randomly assigned to either E-stim or US with crossover at 3 months. The primary outcome was improvement in dystonia or spasticity severity on a visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100) measured 1 month after each injection. The secondary outcome was participant discomfort assessed on a VAS. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance was used with linear mixed-model covariate selection. Results: A total of 19 participants (13 men) completed the study, 10 with upper limb spasticity and 9 with dystonia. Benefit was equivalent between the 2 techniques (VAS least-square mean [LSmean] 51.5 mm with US and 53.1 with E-stim). E-stim was perceived as more uncomfortable by participants (VAS LSmean 34.5 vs. 19.9 for E-stim and US, respectively). Procedure duration was similar with the 2 procedures. There were no serious adverse events related to either approach. Conclusions: US and E-Stim localization guidance techniques provide equivalent efficacy in onabotA injections for spasticity and dystonia. US guidance injections are more comfortable for participants. Both techniques are effective guidance methods, with US potentially preferable based on participant comfort.

Ultrasound as Diagnostic Tool for Diaphragmatic Myoclonus.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic myoclonus is a rare disorder of repetitive diaphragmatic contractions, acknowledged to be a spectrum that includes psychogenic features. Electromyography has been the diagnostic tool most commonly used in the literature. METHODS: To test if we could perform a noninvasive technique to delineate the diaphragm as the source of abnormal movements and demonstrate distractibility and entrainability, we used B-mode ultrasound in a patient with diaphragmatic myoclonus. RESULTS: Ultrasound imaging clearly delineated the diaphragm as the source of her abdominal movements. We were able to demonstrate entrainability of the diaphragm to hand tapping to a prescribed rhythm set by examiner. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of ultrasound as a noninvasive, convenient diagnostic tool for further studies of diaphragmatic myoclonus. We agree with previous findings that diaphragmatic myoclonus may be a functional movement disorder, as evidenced by distractibility and entrainability demonstrated on real-time video with ultrasonography.

Octanoic acid in alcohol-responsive essential tremor: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and efficacy of an oral, single, low dose of octanoic acid (OA) in subjects with alcohol-responsive essential tremor (ET). METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, phase I/II clinical trial evaluating the effect of 4 mg/kg OA in 19 subjects with ET. The primary outcome was accelerometric postural tremor power of the dominant hand 80 minutes after administration. Secondary outcomes included digital spiral analysis, pharmacokinetic sampling, as well as safety measures. RESULTS: OA was safe and well tolerated. Nonserious adverse events were mild (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1) and equally present after OA and placebo. At the primary outcome, OA effects were not different from placebo. Secondary outcome analyses of digital spiral analysis, comparison across the entire time course in weighted and nonweighted accelerometry, as well as nondominant hand tremor power did not show a benefit of OA over placebo. The analysis of individual time points showed that OA improved tremor at 300 minutes (dominant hand, F = 5.49, p = 0.032 vs placebo), with a maximum benefit at 180 minutes after OA (both hands, F = 6.1, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Although the effects of OA and placebo at the primary outcome were not different, secondary outcome measures suggest superiority of OA in reducing tremor at later time points, warranting further trials at higher dose levels. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that a single 4-mg/kg dose of OA is not effective in reducing postural tremor in patients with ET at a primary outcome of 80 minutes, but is effective for a secondary outcome after 180 minutes.

Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterised by motor deficits which eventually respond less to dopaminergic therapy and thus pose a therapeutic challenge. Deep brain stimulation has proven efficacy but carries risks and is not possible in all patients. Non-invasive brain stimulation has shown promising results and may provide a therapeutic alternative. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of PD. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, sham controlled study. SETTING: Research institution. METHODS: The efficacy of anodal tDCS applied to the motor and prefrontal cortices was investigated in eight sessions over 2.5 weeks. Assessment over a 3 month period included timed tests of gait (primary outcome measure) and bradykinesia in the upper extremities, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Serial Reaction Time Task, Beck Depression Inventory, Health Survey and self-assessment of mobility. RESULTS: Twenty-five PD patients were investigated, 13 receiving tDCS and 12 sham stimulation. tDCS improved gait by some measures for a short time and improved bradykinesia in both the on and off states for longer than 3 months. Changes in UPDRS, reaction time, physical and mental well being, and self-assessed mobility did not differ between the tDCS and sham interventions. CONCLUSION: tDCS of the motor and prefrontal cortices may have therapeutic potential in PD but better stimulation parameters need to be established to make the technique clinically viable. This study was publicly registered (clinicaltrials.org: NCT00082342).

Exercise-induced dystonia as a preceding symptom of familial Parkinson's disease.

Paroxysmal exercise-induced dystonia can occur with Parkinson's disease (PD), and in rare cases, this can also be the presenting symptom. We report on 2 second cousins (no known consanguinity) who presented with paroxysmal exercise-induced dystonia who later developed clinical features of PD. Although autosomal recessive inheritance was suggested, and the dystonic features further suggest parkin as a possible cause, sequencing for parkin mutations was negative and this family may represent a genetic variant of PD. Further genotype-phenotype studies in this and similar families may give clues to pre-symptomatic symptoms in PD and may reflect a particular phenotype of interest for genetics studies in the future.