Adjunct therapies after botulinum toxin injections in spastic adults: Systematic review and SOFMER recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Adjunct therapies (ATs) may further improve outcomes after botulinum toxin injections in spastic patients, but evidence was unclear in previous systematic reviews. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of non-pharmacological ATs in spastic adults according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and build an expert consensus-based on a Delphi process. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched up to May 2020 for reports of comparative trials of non-pharmacologic ATs after botulinum toxin injections in spastic adults. Then, 25 French experts participated in a two-round Delphi process to build recommendations on the use of ATs. RESULTS: We included 32 studies (1202 participants, median 32/study) evaluating the effects of physical agents (n=9), joint posture procedures (JPPs, n=11), and active ATs (n=14), mainly after stroke. The average quality of articles was good for randomised controlled trials (median [interquartile range] PEDro score=7 [6-8]) but moderate (n=2) or poor (n=2) for non-randomised controlled trials (Downs & Black checklist). Meta-analysis was precluded owing to the heterogeneity of ATs, control groups and outcome measures. There is evidence for the use of JPPs except low-dose manual stretching and soft posture techniques. Continuous postures (by taping or casting) are recommended; discontinuous postures (by orthosis) may be preferred in patients with active function. Device-free or device-assisted active ATs may be beneficial in the mid-term (>3months after botulinum toxin injections), particularly when performed at a high-intensity (>3h/week) as in constraint-induced movement therapy. Self-rehabilitation remains understudied after a focal treatment, but its interest is highlighted by the experts. The use of physical agents is not recommended. CONCLUSIONS: JPPs and active ATs (device-assisted or device-free) may further improve impairments and activities after botulinum toxin injections. Further studies are needed to better define the best strategies for ATs as a function of the individual treatment goals, participation and quality of life. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42018105856).

Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Hemiparesis in Adults with Lower Limb Spasticity Previously Treated With Other Botulinum Toxins: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA in patients previously treated with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) products other than abobotulinumtoxinA. DESIGN: Secondary analysis from a phase 3, double-blind, single-cycle, randomized, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Fifty-two centers (11 countries). PATIENTS: Adults with spastic hemiparesis were randomized (1:1:1) to receive abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U, 1500 U, or placebo in their affected lower limb. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Muscle tone (6-point Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS], 0-5) for the gastrocnemius-soleus complex (GSC); proportion of MAS responders (≥1-point improvement); angle of catch (XV3 ) and spasticity grade (Y) for the GSC and soleus. Assessments were at weeks 1, 4, and 12 post-injection. Only descriptive statistics are presented. RESULTS: Of 388 patients, 84 received previous BoNT-A treatment (abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U: N = 30; abobotulinumtoxinA 1500 U: N = 28; placebo: N = 26). At week 4, mean (SD) changes in MAS score in the GSC were - 0.8 (1.1), -0.9 (1.0), and - 0.4 (0.7) for abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U, 1500 U, and placebo, respectively. Greater MAS responder rates were observed for abobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo at all time points. Mean (SD) changes (week 4) for abobotulinumtoxinA 1000 U, 1500 U, and placebo for XV3 were: GSC, 8° (21), 6° (10) and 1° (7); soleus, 11° (21), 5° (9) and 0° (8), respectively; for Y: GSC, -0.4 (0.7), -0.6 (0.8) and - 0.0 (0.9); soleus, -0.5 (0.7), -0.5 (0.7) and - 0.1 (0.6), respectively. Safety data and adverse events were consistent with the overall known profile of abobotulinumtoxinA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients previously treated with other BoNT-As showed improved muscle tone and spasticity at week 4 following abobotulinumtoxinA injection versus placebo. These findings suggest that abobotulinumtoxinA, at the recommended doses, has a good safety and efficacy profile in adults with lower limb spasticity who were previously treated with other BoNT-A products.