Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Rev. APS ; 25(Supl. 2): 238-246, 16/08/2022.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1393296

ABSTRACT

Nosso objetivo aqui é relatar uma experiência em que se realizou uma intervenção mediada por gamificacão para a promoção do cuidado aos cuidadores de idosos no Mestrado Profissional em Saúde da Família da Universidade Federal do Maranhão (PROFSAÚDE­UFMA). Nesse percurso, o PROFSAÚDE­UFMA atuou com suas disciplinas na compreensão da magnitude dos problemas pelos quais passam os cuidadores de idosos, proporcionando vivências em um diagnóstico situacional real de uma unidade de saúde da família na capital do Maranhão. Nesse local, ocorreu uma experiência exitosa, com a gamificação,que surgiu como produto de uma intervenção em vídeo para a melhoria dos cuidados aos cuidadores. Além disso, desenvolveu-se um mapa conceitual com a integração das disciplinas no PROFSAÚDE, demostrando a importância da produção do conhecimento seja na amplificação do potencial da educação em saúde de forma significativa e permanente, seja para a melhoria do planejamento e da avaliação dos serviços de saúde. Pretende-se, com a disseminação do conhecimento aqui exposto, proporcionar o envolvimento dos sujeitos e o apoio dos serviços de saúde na oferta de cuidados aos cuidadores de idosos.


Our objective here is to report an experience in which an intervention mediated by gamification was carried out to promote care for elderly caregivers atthe Professional Master's in Family Health at the Federal University of Maranhão(PROFSAÚDE­UFMA). Along this path, PROFSAÚDE­UFMAworked with its disciplines to understand the magnitude of the problems faced by caregivers of the elderly, providing experiences in a real situational diagnosis of a family health unit in the capital of Maranhão. There was a successful experience in this place, with gamification that emerged as a product of a video intervention to improve care for caregivers, and, in addition, a conceptual map was developed with the integration of disciplines in Profsaúde. It demonstrated the importance of knowledge production both by amplifying the potential of health education in a meaningful and permanent way and by improving the planning and evaluation of health services. We intend, through the dissemination of knowledge here exposed, to show the subjects' involvement and to support health services in providing care to the caregivers of the elderly


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Education
2.
Cranio ; 39(5): 440-444, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31379267

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study investigated the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphological changes in women with fibromyalgia (FM) through clinical and tomographic evaluation.Methods: Ten women diagnosed with myofascial pain who were being treated for FM in a university hospital were included in this study. The data were collected through clinical examination and cone beam computed tomography evaluation of the TMJ in closed and open mouth positions.Results: All patients had crackling in the joint, a habit of grinding teeth during sleep, muscle stiffness, and tinnitus. The tomographic findings revealed a higher frequency of condylar bone wear, reduction of joint space, and posterior positioning of the mandibular condyle. The temporomandibular disorders with the highest prevalence were osteoarthritis and disc displacement with reduction.Conclusion: The findings suggest that women with FM have a high frequency of TMD related to the displacement of the articular disc, condyle position, and occurrence of osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Fibromyalgia , Joint Dislocations , Female , Fibromyalgia/complications , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mandibular Condyle , Pain , Temporomandibular Joint , Temporomandibular Joint Disc
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 3: CD006939, 2017 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28319266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common disease affecting about 5% to 15% of the population. Symptoms of RLS can be severe in a minority of and can have a major impact on sleep, mostly sleep initiation, and quality of life. Benzodiazepines are drugs that can induce and maintain sleep and, hence, intuitively are thought to be beneficial to people with RLS. Altough benzodiazepines, particularly clonazepam, are used to treat RLS symptoms, a systematic review done by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine stated that benzodiazepines should not be used as a first-line treatment, although could be used as a coadjuvant therapy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of benzodiazepine compared to placebo or other treatment for idiopathic RLS, including unconfounded trials comparing benzodiazepines versus open control. SEARCH METHODS: In March 2016 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS We checked the references of each study and contacted study authors to identify any additional studies. We considered studies published in any language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials of benzodiazepine treatment in idiopathic RLS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We did not perform data collection and analysis, since we did not include any studies, MAIN RESULTS: We did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria of the review. Two cross-over studies are awaiting classification because the cross-over trials did not give data at the end of the first cross-over period. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of benzodiazepines for RLS treatment is currently unknown.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Restless Legs Syndrome/drug therapy , Humans
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (6): CD006941, 2016 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27355187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a distressing and common neurological disorder that may have a huge impact in the quality of life of those with frequent and intense symptoms. Patients complain of unpleasant sensations in the legs, at or before bedtime, and feel an urge to move the legs, which improves with movement, such as walking. Symptoms start with the patient at rest (e.g. sitting or lying down), and follow a circadian pattern, increasing during the evening or at night. Many pharmacological intervention are available for RLS, including drugs used to treat Parkinson's disease (L-Dopa and dopaminergic agonists), epilepsy (anticonvulsants), anxiety (benzodiazepines), and pain (opioids). Dopaminergic drugs are those most frequently used for treatment of RLS, but some patients do not respond effectively and require other medication. Opioids, a class of medications used to treat severe pain, seem to be effective in treating RLS symptoms, and are recommended for patients with severe symptoms, because RLS and pain appear to share the same mechanism in the central nervous system. All available drugs are associated to some degree with side effects, which can impede treatment. Opioids are associated with adverse events such as constipation, tolerance, and dependence. This justifies the conduct of a systematic review to ascertain whether opioids are safe and effective for treatment of RLS. OBJECTIVES: To asses the effects of opioids compared to placebo treatment for restless legs syndrome in adults. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, CENTRAL 2016, issue 4 and MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS up to April 2016, using a search strategy adapted by Cochraneto identify randomised clinical trials. We checked the references of each study and established personal communication with other authors to identify any additional studies. We considered publications in all languages. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled clinical trials of opioid treatment in adults with idiopathic RLS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened articles, independently extracted data into a standard form, and assessed for risk of bias. If necessary, they discussed discrepancies with a third researcher to resolve any doubts. MAIN RESULTS: We included one randomised clinical trial (N = 304 randomised; 204 completed; 276 analysed) that evaluated opioids (prolonged release oxycodone/naloxone) versus placebo. After 12 weeks, RSL symptoms had improved more in the drug group than in the placebo group (using the IRLSSS: MD -7.0; 95% CI -9.69 to -4.31 and the CGI: MD -1.11; 95% CI -1.49 to -0.73). More patients in the drug group than in the placebo group were drug responders (using the IRLSSS: RR 1.82; 95% CI 1.37 to 2.42 and the CGI: RR1.92; 95% ICI 1.49 to 2.48). The proportion of remitters was greater in the drug group than in the placebo group (using the IRLSSS: RR 2.14; 95% CI 1.45 to 3.16). Quality of life scores also improved more in the drug group than in the placebo group (MD -0.73; 95% CI -1.1 to -0.36). Quality of sleep was improved more in the drug group measured by sleep adequacy (MD -0.74; 95% CI -1.15 to -0.33), and sleep quantity (MD 0.89; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.26).There was no difference between groups for daytime somnolence, trouble staying awake during the day, or naps during the day. More adverse events were reported in the drug group (RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.39). The major adverse events were gastrointestinal problems, fatigue, and headache. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Opioids seem to be effective for treating RLS symptoms, but there are no definitive data regarding the important problem of safety. This conclusion is based on only one study with a high dropout rate (moderate quality evidence).


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Oxycodone/therapeutic use , Restless Legs Syndrome/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/chemically induced , Humans , Naloxone/adverse effects , Oxycodone/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (5): CD006685, 2016 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27153153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review, published in 2009, Issue 2.Kleine-Levin syndrome (KLS) is a rare disorder that mainly affects adolescent men. It is characterised by recurrent episodes of hypersomnia, usually accompanied by hyperphagia, cognitive and mood disturbances, abnormal behaviour, such as hypersexuality, and signs of dysautonomia.In 1990, the diagnostic criteria for Kleine-Levin syndrome were modified in the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, where KLS was defined as a syndrome comprised of recurring episodes of undue sleepiness lasting some days, which may or may not be associated with hyperphagia and abnormal behaviour. According to the International Classification of Sleepiness Disorders, 3rd version (ICSD-3), revised in 2014, the Kleine-Levin syndrome is a disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of hypersomnia that last from two days to four weeks, with at least annual recurrence, and hyperphagia (rapid consumption of a large amount of food), usually with onset in early adolescence in males but occasionally in later life and in women. A monosymptomatic form of the disorder with hypersomnia only can occur without binge eating or hypersexuality.The cause of Kleine-Levin syndrome remains unknown, and several treatment strategies have been used. Some medications have been reported to provide benefit in the treatment of patients with KLS, but because of the rarity of the condition, no long-term follow-up therapies have yet been described. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to evaluate:1. whether pharmacological treatment for Kleine Levin syndrome was effective and safe.2. which drug or category of drugs was effective and safe. SEARCH METHODS: For the latest update, we searched the following sources: the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (7 April 2016); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online CRSO (7 April 2016); MEDLINE (1946 to April 2016); LILACS (7 April 2016); ClinicalTrials.gov (7 April 2016); WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP (7 April 2016); reference lists of sleep medicine textbooks; review articles and reference lists of articles identified by the search strategies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled trials looking at pharmacological interventions for Kleine-Levin syndrome were eligible. We had planned to include both parallel-group and cross-over studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (MMO and CC) had planned to extract the data reported in the original articles. MAIN RESULTS: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic trials of pharmacological treatment for Kleine-Levin syndrome with a double-blind, placebo-controlled design are needed.


Subject(s)
Kleine-Levin Syndrome/drug therapy , Rare Diseases/drug therapy , Humans
6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (8): CD006685, 2013 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23945927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review, published in Issue 2, 2009.Kleine-Levin syndrome (KLS) is a rare disorder that mainly affects adolescent men. It is characterised by recurrent episodes of hypersomnia, usually accompanied by hyperphagia, cognitive and mood disturbances, abnormal behavior such as hypersexuality and signs of dysautonomia.In 1990 the diagnostic criteria for Kleine-Levin syndrome were modified in the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, where KLS was defined as a syndrome composed of recurring episodes of undue sleepiness lasting some days, which may or may not be associated with hyperphagia and abnormal behavior.The cause of Kleine-Levin syndrome remains unknown, and several treatment strategies have been used. Some medications have been reported to provide benefit in the treatment of patients with KLS, but because of the rarity of the condition, no long-term follow-up therapies have yet been described. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to evaluate:1. whether pharmacological treatment for Kleine Levin syndrome is effective and safe.2. which drug or category of drugs is effective and safe. SEARCH METHODS: We obtained relevant trials from the following sources: the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (2 May 2013); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 4, The Cochrane Library, April 2013); MEDLINE (1946 to 2 May 2013); SCOPUS (2 May 2013); LILACS (2 May 2013); ClinicalTrials.gov (2 May 2013); WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP (2 May 2013); reference lists of sleep medicine textbooks; review articles and reference lists of articles identified by the search strategies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled trials looking at pharmacological interventions for Kleine-Levin syndrome were selected. We included both parallel-group and cross-over studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (MMO and CC) extracted the data reported in the original articles. MAIN RESULTS: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic trials of pharmacological treatment for Kleine-Levin syndrome with a double-blind, placebo-controlled design are needed.


Subject(s)
Kleine-Levin Syndrome/drug therapy , Rare Diseases/drug therapy , Humans
7.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 69(5): 805-8, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22042185

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has high prevalence and may cause serious comorbidities. The aim of this trial was to show if simple noninvasive methods such as gag reflex and palatal reflex are prospective multivariate assessments of predictor variables for OSA. METHOD: We evaluate gag reflex and palatal reflex, of fifty-five adult patients, and their subsequent overnight polysomnography. RESULTS: Forty-one participants presented obstructive sleep apnea. The most relevant findings in our study were: [1] absence of gag reflex on patients with severe obstructive apnea (p=0.001); [2] absence of palatal reflex on moderate obstructive apnea patients (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Gag reflex and palatal reflex, a simple noninvasive test regularly performed in a systematic neurological examination can disclose the impact of the local neurogenic injury associated to snoring and/or obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.


Subject(s)
Gagging/physiology , Oropharynx/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Polysomnography , Predictive Value of Tests , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology
8.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 69(5): 805-808, Oct. 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-604222

ABSTRACT

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has high prevalence and may cause serious comorbities. The aim of this trial was to show if simple noninvasive methods such as gag reflex and palatal reflex are prospective multivariate assessments of predictor variables for OSA. METHOD: We evaluate gag reflex and palatal reflex, of fifty-five adult patients, and their subsequent overnight polysomnography. RESULTS: Forty-one participants presented obstructive sleep apnea. The most relevant findings in our study were: [1] absence of gag reflex on patients with severe obstructive apnea (p=0.001); [2] absence of palatal reflex on moderate obstructive apnea patients (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Gag reflex and palatal reflex, a simple noninvasive test regularly performed in a systematic neurological examination can disclose the impact of the local neurogenic injury associated to snoring and/or obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.


A síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono (SAOS) possui alta prevalência e pode causar sérias comorbidades. O objetivo deste estudo foi mostrar se métodos não invasivos como os reflexos nauseoso e palatal podem ser avaliações prospectivas multivariadas preditoras para SAOS. MÉTODO: Avaliamos os reflexos palatal e nauseoso em 55 pacientes adultos, com exame polissonográfico subsequente. RESULTADOS: 41 pacientes apresentaram SAOS. Os achados mais relevantes em nosso estudo foram: [1] ausência do reflexo nauseoso em pacientes com SAOS grave (p=0,001); [2] ausência do reflexo palatal em pacientes com SAOS moderada (p=0,02). CONCLUSÃO: Os reflexos nauseoso e palatal, um simples exame não invasivo, aplicado em uma avaliação neurológica rotineira, pode revelar o impacto de lesões neurogênicas locais associadas ao ronco e/ou a SAOS.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Gagging/physiology , Oropharynx/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Pilot Projects , Polysomnography , Predictive Value of Tests , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology
9.
Sleep Breath ; 15(2): 209-13, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21229321

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may have subclinical swallowing abnormalities due to progressive mechanical trauma of the pharyngeal tissues caused by snoring. There are few trials on swallowing among OSA patients, and most of them used videoradiography. The aim of this trial was to show swallowing function in OSA patients by nasal fibroscopy. METHOD: Eleven patients with OSA diagnosed by polysomnography, with a mean age of 48 ± 14 years, without spontaneous complaints of swallowing, and 14 non-snoring volunteers, with a mean age of 47 ± 12 years, without spontaneous complaints of swallowing, participated in the study. The participants were evaluated using nasal fibroscopy. Each participant was offered diet boluses (5 and 10 ml) such as thin liquids, purée, and solids, and their swallowing function was determined according to the following criteria: (1) premature oral leakage to the pharynx; (2) laryngeal penetration; (3) tracheal aspiration; and (4) pharyngeal stasis. RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of the OSA patients presented premature oral leakage, 55% presented pharyngeal stasis of the bolus after swallowing, and we did not observe laryngeal penetration or tracheal aspiration. There were no subclinical manifestations in the control group. CONCLUSION: OSA patients presented subclinical manifestations of abnormal swallowing, when analyzed using nasal fibroscopy, possibly associated with neuromuscular injury caused by snoring.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/physiopathology , Endoscopy , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Young Adult
10.
Mov Disord ; 25(10): 1335-42, 2010 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20544816

ABSTRACT

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common and often misdiagnosed entity among the general population and it may be more common among dialysis patients, with an estimated prevalence of 6.6 to 21.5%. The treatment for uremic RLS has been controversial and therefore a systematic synthesis of the evidence is needed in order to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatments for uremic RLS. This was a systematic review of randomized or quasi-randomized double-blind trials on treatments for uremic RLS. The outcomes considered were relief of RLS symptoms marked on a validated scale, subjective sleep quality, sleep quality measured using night polysomnography and actigraphy, quality of life measured subjectively, and adverse events associated with these treatments. Six eligible clinical trials were included. The results from subjective analyses in these studies were divergent, although objective analyses in one trial showed that there was a statistically significant improvement in periodic leg movement while asleep in the treatment group. No combined analysis (meta-analysis) was performed. The most common adverse event seen was gastrointestinal symptoms. Only a few therapeutic trials on patients with uremia with RLS have been published, and there is insufficient scientific evidence to favor any specific therapeutic regimen for uremic-associated RLS. Therapy using levodopa, dopaminergic agonists, anticonvulsants, and clonidine tend to be effective, but further studies are needed.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Restless Legs Syndrome/complications , Restless Legs Syndrome/drug therapy , Uremia/drug therapy , Uremia/etiology , Cross-Over Studies , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
11.
Sleep Breath ; 14(4): 299-305, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20563659

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using methods for increasing upper airway muscle tonus has been controversial and poorly reported. Thus, a review of the evidence is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods. DESIGN: The design used was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Data sources are from the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Scielo, registries of ongoing trials, theses indexed at Biblioteca Regional de Medicina/Pan-American Health Organization of the World Health Organization and the reference lists of all the trials retrieved. REVIEW METHODS: This was a review of randomized or quasi-randomized double-blind trials on OSA. Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria. One reviewer assessed study quality and extracted data, and these processes were checked by a second reviewer. The primary outcome was a decrease in the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) of below five episodes per hour. Other outcomes were subjective sleep quality, sleep quality measured by night polysomnography, quality of life measured subjectively and adverse events associated with the treatments. DATA SYNTHESIS: Three eligible trials were included. Two studies showed improvements through the objective and subjective analyses, and one study showed improvement of snoring, but not of AHI while the subjective analyses showed no improvement. The adverse events were reported and they were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: There is no accepted scientific evidence that methods aiming to increase muscle tonus of the stomatognathic system are effective in reducing AHI to below five events per hour. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy of such methods.


Subject(s)
Laryngeal Muscles/physiopathology , Muscle Tonus/physiology , Palatal Muscles/physiopathology , Pharyngeal Muscles/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/rehabilitation , Tongue/physiopathology , Airway Resistance/physiology , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Exercise Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology
12.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD006685, 2009 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19370648

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Kleine-Levin Syndrome (KLS) is a rare disorder which mainly affects adolescent men. It is characterized by recurrent episodes of hypersomnia, usually accompanied by hyperphagia, cognitive and mood disturbances, abnormal behavior such as hypersexuality, and signs of dysautonomia.In 1990 the diagnostic criteria for Kleine-Levin Syndrome were modified in the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, where it was defined as a syndrome composed of recurring episodes of undue sleepiness lasting some days, which may or may not be associated with hyperphagia and abnormal behavior.The etiology of Kleine-Levin Syndrome remains unknown and several treatment strategies have been used. Some medications have been reported to provide some benefit for the treatment of Kleine-Levin Syndrome patients, but because of the rarity of the condition no long-term follow-up therapies have yet been described. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to evaluate:1. whether pharmacological treatment for Kleine-Levin Syndrome is effective and safe; and 2. which drug or category of drugs is effective and safe. SEARCH STRATEGY: We obtained relevant trials from the following sources: the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (1 December 2007); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2007); MEDLINE (1966 to December 2007); EMBASE (1980 to December 2007); LILACS (1982 to December 2007); reference lists of sleep medicine textbooks; review articles and reference lists of articles identified by the search strategies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials looking at pharmacological interventions for Kleine-Levin Syndrome. We included both parallel group and cross-over studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (MO and CC) extracted the data reported in the original articles. MAIN RESULTS: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic trials of pharmacological treatment for Kleine-Levin Syndrome, with a double-blind, placebo-controlled design are needed.


Subject(s)
Kleine-Levin Syndrome/drug therapy , Humans
13.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 66(3B): 773-6, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18949285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Snoring is the noise caused by vibration during the in-breath; and which structure actually vibrates depends on many factors. OBJECTIVE: The treatment of snoring with methods to increase muscle tonus of upper airway has been controversial, and poorly reported, thus a review of evidence is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods. METHOD: A review of randomized or quasi-randomized, double blind trials on snoring treatment that have employed any method to increase muscle tonus of upper airway like phonotherapy or physical therapy among others. OUTCOMES: decrease or completely stop of snoring, sleep quality, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: Three eligible trials were potentially analyzed, but none of them could provide good scientific evidence favoring the intervention. The objective analyses of one study showed improvement of snoring, although the objective sub-analyses and subjective analyses showed controversial results. The adverse events were not reported. CONCLUSION: There is no enough evidence to support the recommendation of methods to increase muscle tonus of upper airways in treatment of snoring. Well designed randomized clinical trials are needed to asses the efficacy of such methods, and a standard and worldwide accepted method for snoring assessment would be useful for future researches.


Subject(s)
Breathing Exercises , Muscle Tonus/physiology , Respiratory Muscles/physiopathology , Snoring/therapy , Exercise Therapy/methods , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Snoring/physiopathology
14.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 66(3b): 773-776, set. 2008.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-495556

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Snoring is the noise caused by vibration during the in-breath; and which structure actually vibrates depends on many factors. OBJECTIVE: The treatment of snoring with methods to increase muscle tonus of upper airway has been controversial, and poorly reported, thus a review of evidence is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods. METHOD: A review of randomized or quasi-randomized, double blind trials on snoring treatment that have employed any method to increase muscle tonus of upper airway like phonotherapy or physical therapy among others. Outcomes: decrease or completely stop of snoring, sleep quality, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: Three eligible trials were potentially analyzed, but none of them could provide good scientific evidence favoring the intervention. The objective analyses of one study showed improvement of snoring, although the objective sub-analyses and subjective analyses showed controversial results. The adverse events were not reported. CONCLUSION: There is no enough evidence to support the recommendation of methods to increase muscle tonus of upper airways in treatment of snoring. Well designed randomized clinical trials are needed to asses the efficacy of such methods, and a standard and worldwide accepted method for snoring assessment would be useful for future researches.


CONTEXTO: O ronco é o ruído causado pela vibração durante a inspiração, cujas estruturas vibratórias, dependem atualmente de vários fatores. OBJETIVO: O tratamento do ronco com métodos para aumentar o tônus muscular da via aérea superior tem sido controverso e pouco relatado, portanto uma revisão de evidências é necessária para avaliar a efetividade destes métodos. MÉTODO: Revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados ou quasi-randomizados, duplo-cegos para o tratamento do ronco, com métodos visando o aumento do tônus da via aérea superior, tais como fonoterapia e fisioterapia. Desfechos: diminuição ou cura do ronco, qualidade do sono, qualidade de vida e efeitos adversos. RESULTADOS: Três estudos elegíveis foram potencialmente analisados, porém nenhum deles demonstrou evidência científica de qualidade favorecendo a intervenção. As análises subjetivas em um estudo mostrou melhora do ronco, entretanto as sub-análises objetivas demonstraram resultados controversos. Os efeitos adversos não foram relatados. CONCLUSÃO: Não existe evidência científica suficiente para sustentar a recomendação de métodos para aumentar o tônus muscular da via aérea superior no tratamento do ronco. Ensaios clínicos randomizados bem elaborados são necessários para avaliarmos a eficácia de tais métodos e uma padronização de métodos para intervir no ronco mundialmente aceitos se tornariam úteis em pesquisas futuras.


Subject(s)
Humans , Breathing Exercises , Muscle Tonus/physiology , Respiratory Muscles/physiopathology , Snoring/therapy , Exercise Therapy/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Snoring/physiopathology
15.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 66(2B): 431-5, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18641891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensory motor disorder characterized by a distressing urge to move the legs and sometimes also other parts of the body usually accompanied by a marked sense of discomfort or pain in the leg or other affected body part. Many treatments have been used to minimize the discomfort of the disease, among them the anticonvulsant therapy. AIM: This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticonvulsant treatment for idiopathic RLS. METHOD: Systematic review of randomized or quasi-randomized, double blind trials on anticonvulsant treatment for RLS. OUTCOMES: relief of RLS symptoms, subjective and objective sleep quality, quality of life, and adverse events associated with the treatments. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients were randomized in three cross over studies and one parallel study. Three studies with carbamazepine, one with sodium valproate, and one with gabapentin, and they were very heterogeneous so we could not perform a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is no scientific evidence on RLS treatment with anticonvulsants for clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Restless Legs Syndrome/drug therapy , Amines/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Carbamazepine/therapeutic use , Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine , Gabapentin , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Valproic Acid/therapeutic use , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/therapeutic use
16.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 66(2b): 431-435, jun. 2008. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-486210

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensory motor disorder characterized by a distressing urge to move the legs and sometimes also other parts of the body usually accompanied by a marked sense of discomfort or pain in the leg or other affected body part. Many treatments have been used to minimize the discomfort of the disease, among them the anticonvulsant therapy. AIM: This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticonvulsant treatment for idiopathic RLS. METHOD: Systematic review of randomized or quasi-randomized, double blind trials on anticonvulsant treatment for RLS. Outcomes: relief of RLS symptoms, subjective and objective sleep quality, quality of life, and adverse events associated with the treatments. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients were randomized in three cross over studies and one parallel study. Three studies with carbamazepine, one with sodium valproate, and one with gabapentin, and they were very heterogeneous so we could not perform a metanalyses. CONCLUSIONS: There is no scientific evidence on RLS treatment with anticonvulsants for clinical practice.


CONTEXTO: A síndrome das pernas inquietas (SPI ) é uma desordem caracterizada por um impulso de mover as pernas e as vezes outras partes do corpo acompanhado geralmente por desconforto ou da dor nas pernas ou em outra parte afetada. Muitos tratamentos tem sido utilizados para aliviar o desconforto causado pela doença entre eles os anticonvulsivantes. OBJETIVO: Este estudo objetivou avaliar a eficácia e segurança do tratamento da SPI com as drogas anticonvulsivantes. MÉTODO: Revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados ou quasi-randomizados, duplo-cegos para o tratamento com anticonvulsivantes para SPI. Desfechos: alívio dos sintomas da SPI, qualidade subjetiva e objetiva do sono, qualidade de vida e efeitos adversos relacionados ao tratamento. RESULTADOS: Um total de 231 pacientes foram randomizados em três estudos cross-over e um estudo paralelo. Três estudos avaliaram a carbamazepina, um estudo avaliou o ácido valpróico e o outro a gabapentina, eles eram muito heterogêneos, o que impossibilitou a metanálise dos resultados. CONCLUSÃO: Não existe evidência científica, que o tratamento da SPI com anticonvulsivantes é eficaz e seguro, para a prática clínica.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Restless Legs Syndrome/drug therapy , Amines/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Carbamazepine/therapeutic use , Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine , Treatment Outcome , Valproic Acid/therapeutic use , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/therapeutic use
17.
Mov Disord ; 22(13): 1943-51, 2007 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17659645

ABSTRACT

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensory motor disorder characterized by a distressing urge to move the legs and sometimes also other parts of the body usually accompanied by a marked sense of discomfort or pain in the leg or other affected body part. The prevalence of RLS is estimated at 2.7 to 5% of adults and it is more common in women. The treatment of RLS with levodopa has been reported thus a systematic synthesis of evidence is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of levodopa for RLS. Systematic review of randomized or quasi-randomized, double blind trials on levodopa. Relief of restless legs symptoms marked on a validated scale, subjective sleep quality, sleep quality measured by night polysomnography and actigraphy, quality of life measured by subjective measures, adverse events associated with the treatments. Nine eligible clinical trials were included. The subjective analyses of these studies showed contradictory results, although the objective analyses showed that treatment group had a statistically significant improvement of periodic leg movement (PLM) index, favoring the treatment group. The most commonly adverse event seen was gastrointestinal symptoms. The short-term treatment with levodopa was demonstrated effective and safety for PLM, but there was only few trials assessing long-term treatment and the augmentation phenomenon in RLS. Further long-term randomized controlled trials using standard follow-up measurements as the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale are necessary.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Restless Legs Syndrome/drug therapy , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Levodopa/adverse effects , Long-Term Care , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Restless Legs Syndrome/psychology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...