Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Med Chir ; 36(5-6): 103, 2014 Dec 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25669894

ABSTRACT

Children have an high risk of renal damage as a result of blunt trauma. Conservative management is always recommended for lower grades (I to III) but is rather controversial whenever high grade injuries (grade IV and V) are concerned. We describe a case of successful conservative management in grade IV renal injury occurred in a 9-years-old girl with blunt trauma.


Subject(s)
Kidney/injuries , Stents , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Child , Drainage/methods , Female , Humans , Kidney/pathology , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/pathology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy
2.
Clin Ter ; 159(4): 243-8, 2008.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18776981

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness and acceptability of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in pediatric patients and to propose a data collection and follow-up methodology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational retrospective and prospective study on 33 pediatric patients and 5 adults with PEG, placed using Gauderer "push" technique, between 2000 and 2007. By means of an appropriate questionnaire, the following parameters were evaluated: complications, factors of further risk, nutritional status, management and acceptability of PEG. RESULTS: No problems occurred during placement. Complications were few and easy to resolve. In 3 patients a stomal dehiscence occurred, strongly related to the tube gauge. During replacement, in 4 patients, bumper was not taken away because of difficult removal. 8 patients had pre-PEG Gastroesophageal reflux: In 2 of them, during the PEG placement, fundoplication was realized. Subsequently PEG procedure, only 1 patient needed fundoplication for worsening of GER. All of them continued gastroprotective treatment. Respiratory tract infections decreased in our 13 patients carries of tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: To prefer smaller gauge reduces risk of dehiscence. If the bumper's removal is hard, to leave it inside is acceptable and quite safe, on condition of a careful surveillance of gastrointestinal obstruction signs. GER is not a contraindication of PEG. A careful follow-up is important, by recording all the evaluated parameters and by questionnaire to the family, during every hospital admission. This study, even if on few patients, confi rms PEG as the technique of choice for long-term enteral feeding, also in children. Training of family and caregivers is important to care.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Gastrostomy/methods , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Data Collection/methods , Enteral Nutrition/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fundoplication , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Humans , Infant , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/prevention & control , Tracheostomy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...