The combination of cognitive testing and an informant questionnaire in screening for dementia.

AIM: A cognitive test and an informant report questionnaire were used together to investigate whether their combined use could improve the accuracy of detecting dementia in a memory clinic, compared with either test used alone. METHOD: The subjects were 323 patients assessed at a memory clinic. The Mini-Mental State Examination and the short form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly were used. A method of combining the test scores developed by Mackinnon and Mulligan [Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 1529-35] was used. Dementia was diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition-Revised criteria. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed that the combination of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly produced a slightly more accurate prediction of dementia caseness than either test used alone. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis the performance of the combination of the tests according to a weighted sum rule was compared with the performance of either test used alone. This way of combining the tests resulted in a more accurate screening for dementia than when the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly was used alone. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the Mini-Mental State Examination combined with the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly was 0.89 compared with 0.82 for the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly alone (chi-square = 10.63; P = 0.0011). However, there was no improvement in screening performance when the combination of Mini-Mental State Examination and Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly was compared with the Mini-Mental State Examination used alone (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.89 versus 0.86; chi-square = 3.54; P = 0.060). CONCLUSION: The combination of cognitive testing and an informant report according to a weighted sum rule in this population did not result in any advantage over the use of the Mini-Mental State Examination alone. The mixed results of this study contrast with those of Mackinnon and Mulligan.

A memory clinic at a geriatric hospital: a report on 577 patients assessed with the CAMDEX over 9 years.

OBJECTIVE: To report 9 years' experience of an Australian memory clinic using the -Cambridge Mental Disorders in the Elderly Examination (CAMDEX) assessment schedule, summarizing patient demographics, diagnoses at presentation and the utility of four instruments used in distinguishing patients with and without dementia. METHODS: All patients seen at the clinic between December 1989 and September 1998 were assessed using the CAMDEX. Diagnoses were determined according to criteria of the International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition (ICD-10). RESULTS: The mean age of 577 patients seen was 72.9 years and 60.8% were female. Over 40% fulfilled ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for dementia in Alzheimer's disease. A further 24% had another dementing illness. Only 28 patients were "normal". There was no significant difference in the ability of the 107-item Cambridge cognitive examination, the 30-item mini-mental state examination, the 10-item abbreviated mental test score and the 26-item informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly to differentiate dementia patients from those who were normal or had functional psychiatric disorders. The four cognitive screening tools had high correlations with one another (r = - 0.57 to 0.93). CONCLUSION: Patient demographics and diagnoses were similar to those found in other clinics. Most people who attended the memory clinic had significant cognitive or psychiatric disorders.