The association of frontal plane alignment to MRI-defined worsening of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: the MOST study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sex-specific relation of frontal plane alignment (FPA) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined features of patellofemoral osteoarthritis, and also to tibiofemoral osteoarthritis and knee pain. METHOD: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study is cohort study comprised of individuals with or at risk of knee osteoarthritis. We determined the sex-specific dose-response relation of baseline FPA to MRI-defined patellofemoral and tibiofemoral structural worsening, and incident knee pain, over 7 years. RESULTS: In women only, greater varus alignment was associated with medial patellofemoral osteophytes (risk ratio [RR] 1.7 [95% CI 1.2, 2.6]) and valgus with lateral patellofemoral osteophytes (RR 1.9 [1.0, 3.6]). In men, greater varus increased risk for medial tibiofemoral cartilage worsening (RR 1.7 [1.1, 2.6]), and valgus for lateral tibiofemoral cartilage worsening (RR 1.8 [1.6, 2.2]). In women, findings were similar for tibiofemoral cartilage, but varus also increased risk for medial bone marrow lesions [BMLs] (RR 2.2 [1.6, 3.1]) and medial osteophytes (RR 1.8 [1.3, 2.5]), and valgus for lateral BMLs (RR 3.3 [2.2, 4.5]) and osteophytes (RR 2.0 [1.2, 3.2]). Varus increased risk of incident pain in men (RR 1.7 [1.4, 2.2]) and women (RR 1.3 [1.0, 1.6]), valgus did so in men only (RR 1.5 [1.1, 1.9]). CONCLUSION: FPA was associated with patellofemoral osteophyte worsening in women, though overall was more strongly associated with tibiofemoral than patellofemoral osteoarthritis feature worsening. FPA in women was more consistently associated with structural worsening, yet men had higher associations with incident pain.

Validity and sensitivity to change of three scales for the radiographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis using images from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and sensitivity to change of three knee osteoarthritis (OA) grading scales. The Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) and the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) joint space narrowing (JSN) grading scales are well-established. The third scale, the compartmental grading scale for OA (CG) is a novel scale which grades JSN, femoral osteophytes, tibial erosion and subluxation to create a total score. METHODS: One sample of 72 posteroanterior (PA) fixed-flexion radiographs displaying mild to moderate knee OA was selected from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) to study validity. A second sample of 75 radiograph pairs, which showed an increase in OA severity over 30 months, was selected to study sensitivity to change. The three radiographic grading scales were applied to each radiograph in both samples. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to correlate the radiographic grades and the change in grades over 30 months with a Whole-organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS)-based composite score which included five articular features of knee OA. RESULTS: Correlations between the KL, OARSI JSN and CG grading scales and the magnetic resonance image (MRI)-based score were 0.836, 0.840 and 0.773 (P < 0.0001) respectively while correlations between change in the radiographic grading scales and change in the MRI-based score were 0.501, 0.525 and 0.492 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: All three radiographic grading scales showed high validity and are suitable to assess knee OA severity. They showed moderate sensitivity to change; therefore caution should be taken when using ordinal radiographic grading scales to monitor knee OA over time.

Standardized standing pelvis-to-floor photographs for the assessment of lower-extremity alignment.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to assess the intra-rater, inter-rater and test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of lower-extremity alignment estimated from a photograph [photographic alignment (PA) angle]. METHODS: A convenience sample of participants was recruited from the community. Radiopaque stickers were placed over participants' anterior superior iliac spines. One radiograph and one photograph were taken with the participant standing in a standardized position. The stickers were removed. After 30 min they were reapplied and a second photograph was taken. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was measured from each radiograph using customized imaging analysis software. The same software was used by three readers to measure the PA angle from each photograph from the first set twice, at least 2 weeks apart. One reader measured the PA angle from the second set of photographs. Reliability was tested using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(2,1)), Bland-Altman analyses and the minimal detectable change (MDC95). Concurrent validity was tested using a Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Fifty adults participated (mean age 41.8 years; mean body mass index 24.7 kg/m(2)). The PA angle was 4.5° more varus than the HKA angle; these measures were highly correlated (r = 0.92). Intra-rater (ICC(2,1) > 0.985), inter-rater (ICC(2,1) = 0.988) and test-retest reliability (ICC(2,1) = 0.903) showed negligible bias (<0.20°). The MDC95 was 2.69°. CONCLUSIONS: The PA angle may be used in place of the HKA angle if a bias of 4.5° is added. A difference of 3° between baseline and follow-up would be considered a true difference.

Does measurement of the anatomic axis consistently predict hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) for knee alignment studies in osteoarthritis? Analysis of long limb radiographs from the multicenter osteoarthritis (MOST) study.

OBJECTIVE: Researchers commonly use the femoral shaft-tibial shaft angle (FS-TS) from knee radiographs to estimate the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) in studies examining risk factors for knee osteoarthritis (OA) incidence and progression. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between HKA and FS-TS, depending on the method of calculating FS-TS and the direction and degree of knee deformity. METHODS: 120 full-length digital radiographs were assigned, with 30 in each of four alignment groups (0.0°-4.9°, and ≥5.0° of varus and valgus), from a large cohort of persons with and at risk of knee OA. HKA and five measures of FS-TS (using progressively shorter shaft lengths) were obtained using Horizons Analysis Software, Orthopaedic Alignment & Imaging Systems Inc. (OAISYS). The offsets between HKA and the different versions of FS-TS were calculated, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pearson correlations were calculated. RESULTS: In varus limbs use of a shorter shaft length increased the offset between HKA and FS-TS from 5.1° to 7.0°. The opposite occurred with valgus limbs (from 5.0° to 3.7°). Correlations between HKA and FS-TS for the whole sample of 120 individuals were excellent (r range 1.00-0.88). However, correlations for individual alignment groups were low to moderate, especially for the shortest-shaft FS-TS (r range 0.41-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: The offsets obtained using the shorter FS-TS measurements vary depending on direction and degree of knee deformity, and therefore may not provide reliable predictions for HKA We recommend that full-length radiographs be used whenever an accurate estimation of HKA is required, although broad categories of alignment can be estimated with FS-TS.

Can anatomic alignment measured from a knee radiograph substitute for mechanical alignment from full limb films?

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether categories of anatomic alignment (varus, neutral, valgus) measured from knee X-rays agree with similar categories of mechanical alignment from the full limb film and whether varus anatomic malalignment predicts medial joint space loss on knee X-rays as well as varus mechanical alignment. METHODS: We used data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) (full limb and flexed knee X-rays) to examine agreement of anatomic and mechanical alignment and data from Boston Osteoarthritis of the Knee Study (BOKS) to evaluate the association of full limb mechanical alignment vs knee X-ray anatomic alignment with joint space loss. A 4 degree offset was used to correct for the more valgus angulation of the anatomic alignment. RESULTS: Of 143 subjects whose knee X-rays and full limb films were publicly released from the OAI, the agreement of varus, neutral and valgus alignment was only moderate (kappa=0.43, P<0.001). In BOKS, varus mechanical and anatomic alignments measured from full limb and knee X-rays respectively both predicted a high risk of medial joint space loss vs neutral alignment--for mechanical alignment, odds ratio (OR)=4.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.93, 12.00] and for anatomic alignment OR=4.25 (95% CI 2.08, 8.72). CONCLUSIONS: While agreement of alignment from knee X-ray to full limb film was only moderate, varus malalignment measured from a flexed knee predicted the likelihood of progression well. Flexed knee alignment may be more relevant to knee osteoarthritis (OA) risk than that of a fully extended knee, but a measurement of alignment from a short limb is an imperfect surrogate for full limb alignment.