Pulmonary bullet embolism - a safe treatment strategy of a potentially fatal injury: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Vascular embolization of a projectile discharged from a weapon is a rare event. In this report a hunter's errant gunshot struck a farmer in the left chest. CASE REPORT: The projectile was lodged between the apex of the heart and the diaphragm. The patient was treated non-operatively and was discharged home only to return to the emergency department with chest pain and subsequent identification of the projectile in the left inferior pulmonary vein. Operative management consisted of a median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and a pulmonary venectomy. CONCLUSION: He was subsequently discharged home and recovered uneventfully.

Referral patterns to renal services: what has changed in the past 4 years?

BACKGROUND: Awareness of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been prompted by the publication of several large epidemiological studies since 2002. This has led to various initiatives for the early identification and management of CKD, including the introduction of automated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reporting and renal indicators in the primary care quality and outcomes framework (QOF) since April 2006. These initiatives were intended to promote identification of CKD and have had an impact on referral patterns to renal services. The aim of this study was to understand the nature of this impact in a catchment population of 1.2 million people. METHODS: Data were collected and recorded from all written referrals from primary care between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2008. Referral patterns for each postcode sector were mapped using Microsoft MapPoint 2004. The effect of chance on referral patterns was modelled by using small area analysis techniques. The association between the CKD prevalence reported from QOF data and the estimated CKD prevalence was examined at post-code district level. RESULTS: There were 1461 referrals in 2 years prior to the introduction of the initiatives and 2890 referrals in the 2 years post-introduction. The main reason for referral in both groups was impaired renal function or previously established renal disease. Reported comorbidity was similar between the groups. Mapping showed that there was wide heterogeneity in referral behaviour in the first 2 years of the study, which was less in the second period. Small area analysis suggested that the variation that led to the extremal quotients observed in both of the study periods was not due to random variation in referral pattern alone. There was no correlation between the reported CKD prevalence and the referral rates. CONCLUSION: Referral patterns have changed between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2008. The main findings were an increase in referral rate and in the age at referral without a significant change in reported comorbidity of the people referred. The main increase in referral rates was seen in more advanced CKD suggesting more targeted referral of patients with CKD to renal services.

Kidney disease management in UK primary care: guidelines, incentives and information technology.

The last few years have seen new developments to understand and tackle the significant public health issue posed by chronic kidney disease (CKD). Established renal disease currently consumes 2% of the UK National Health Service budget and predictions are that this figure will increase significantly due to the rising number of people requiring renal replacement therapy fuelled by the ageing population and the diabetes mellitus epidemic. This paper reviews the scale of CKD and discusses the new developments such as staging, referral guidelines and new Department of Health incentives brought about to improve awareness. The importance of Information Technology in assisting the management of renal disease is also outlined. We identify various types of intervention which might be used to do this: feedback in an educational context, the establishment of computerized decision support and enhancement of the patient journey. Many principles may be extended to the management of any chronic disease. While new developments are necessary to improve care, wider implementation is required to be able to see if improved outcomes are achieved.

The cost of implementing UK guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health problem. In the UK, guidelines have been developed to facilitate case identification and management. Our aim was to estimate the annualized cost of implementation of the guidelines on newly identified CKD cases. METHODS: We interrogated the New Opportunities for Early Renal Intervention by Computerised Assessment (NEOERICA) database using a Java program created to recompile the CKD guidelines into rule-based decision trees. This categorized all patients with a serum creatinine recorded over a 1-year period into those requiring more tests or referral. A 12-month cost analysis for following the guidelines was performed. RESULTS: In the first year, a practice of 10,000 would identify 147.5 patients with stages 3-5 CKD over and above those already known. All stages 4-5 CKD cases would require nephrology referral. Of those with stage 3 CKD (143.85), 126.27 stable patients would require more tests. The following would require referral: 14.8 with estimated glomerular filtration rate decline>or=5 ml/min/1.73 m2/year, 1.11 with haemoglobin<11 g/dl and 1.67 with blood pressure>150/90 on three anti-hypertensives. The projected cost per practice of investigating stable stage 3 CKD was euro 6111; and euro 7836 for nephrology referral. Total costs of euro 17 133 in the first year were increased to euro 29,790 through the effect of creatinine calibration. CONCLUSIONS: CKD guideline implementation results in significant increases in nephrology referral and additional investigation. These costs could be recouped by delaying dialysis requirement by 1 year in one individual per 10,000 patients managed according to guidelines.