Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Reprod Med ; 32(2): 83-90, 1987 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3560083

ABSTRACT

An analysis of 25 perinatal malpractice cases filed in Wisconsin between 1978 and 1984 clearly revealed that the unfavorable outcomes were preventable and caused by professional negligence. Each case was settled or adjudicated in favor of the plaintiff, and the awards totaled $25.1 million. Although cases with a total recovery of over $1 million are relatively infrequent, they are not so rare as to be considered extra-ordinary occurrences. Fifty-six percent of physicians involved failed to recognize a high-risk pregnancy or fetal distress, while 44% failed to render proper care. The most common errors involved inadequate fetal monitoring, the injudicious use of oxytocin and the failure to recognize a high-risk pregnancy, such as prematurity or postterm or multiple gestation. The purpose of this study was to examine the medicolegal issues operating in such cases in order to develop guidelines for reducing professional negligence, thereby preventing injury to women and their newborns.


Subject(s)
Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Perinatology , Prenatal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Fetal Distress/diagnosis , Fetal Monitoring , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Perinatology/standards , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Risk , Wisconsin
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL