Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 28(3): 190-6, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26936612

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Objective Peripheral enamel staining is often noticed after removal of long-term veneer or crown provisional restorations. Application of carbamide peroxide (CP) easily removes the stain, but the potential for immediate bonding with a resin-based cement is questionable. This project tested the short-term, shear bond strength of a commercial, photo-curable, resin cement to bovine enamel after application of a 10% concentration of CP placed for different exposure times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bovine enamel was flattened and polished. Surfaces had either no CP application (control), or 10% CP applied for 10, 20, or 30 seconds. Teeth were acid-etched, rinsed, dried, and controlled sized stubs of a commercial resin cement were photocured onto the treated surfaces. The shear bond strength of each specimen was determined using a universal testing machine, and results were compared using an analysis of variance at a preset alpha of 0.5 (n = 10/group). RESULTS: No significant differences (p = 0.819) in shear bond strength were found among any CP cleaning treatments or the experimental (nontreated) control. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term application of 10% carbamide peroxide prior to acid etching, to remove enamel stains in teeth prepared to receive ceramic veneers or crowns, does not reduce immediate shear bond strength of resin-based cement to enamel. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians can confidently apply 10% CP for short-term, localized stain removal on enamel and not be concerned about affecting subsequent bond strength of a resin-based cement to enamel. (J Esthet Restor Dent, 2016).


Subject(s)
Dental Enamel , Peroxides/administration & dosage , Resin Cements , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Carbamide Peroxide , Cattle , Urea/administration & dosage
2.
J Dent Educ ; 79(12): 1445-51, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26632299

ABSTRACT

When a dental school is deciding which technology to introduce into a curriculum, it is important to identify the educational goals for the system. The authors' primary goal for the use of a computer-aided resource was to offer students another way to assess their performance, to enhance their learning, and to potentially decrease their learning curve in the preclinical environment prior to using the technique in clinical patient care. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the "% Comparison" numbers derived from the E4D Compare software program. Three practical examinations were administered to a class of 82 students at one U.S. dental school over a six-week period. The grading of the practical examinations was performed with individual faculty members being responsible for evaluating specific aspects of each preparation. A digital image of each student's practical examination tooth was then obtained and compared to the digital image of an ideal preparation. The preparations were compared, and the "% Comparison" was recorded at five tolerance levels. Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) was used to measure the agreement in rankings between the faculty scores on practical exams 1-3 and the scores obtained using E4D Compare at the different tolerance levels. The SCC values for practical exams 2 and 3 were all between 0.2 and 0.4; for practical exam 1, the SCC values ranged from 0.47 to 0.56. There was no correlation between the faculty scores and the numbers given by the "% Comparison" of the software.


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dentistry, Operative/education , Education, Dental , Educational Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Software/statistics & numerical data , Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic/methods , Computer-Aided Design , Educational Measurement/methods , Educational Technology/statistics & numerical data , Faculty, Dental , Formative Feedback , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Students, Dental
3.
J Dent Educ ; 79(6): 705-10, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26034036

ABSTRACT

The use of computers to aid in instruction and help decrease the subjective component of assessment is steadily increasing. One of the potential barriers to the effective utilization of CAD/CAM technology for assessment purposes is the efficient scanning of the teeth being used for comparison. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if the use of different typodonts, of the same make and model, has any significant effect on the percent comparison results when using E4D Compare. Tooth #30 was prepared by a faculty member to represent what dental students at Georgia Regents University are taught as the ideal preparation for a full gold crown. Ten typodonts of the same make and model were selected for comparison. Three different examples of students' preparations were scanned and compared to the ideal preparation. Each of the three student preparations was subjected to ten trials (occasions), one for each typodont, at five tolerance levels: 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, 0.4 mm, and 0.5 mm. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure the intrarater agreement among the typodonts at the various tolerance levels. The agreement coefficients (0.971-0.984) indicated very little variability attributable to the use of a different typodont. The high agreement coefficients achieved using different typodonts of the same make and model provide evidence for the interchangeability of typodonts when assessing a student's performance in the preclinical simulation environment.


Subject(s)
Dentistry, Operative/education , Education, Dental , Educational Measurement/methods , Educational Technology , Models, Dental/classification , Self-Evaluation Programs , Software , Computer-Aided Design , Crowns/standards , Faculty, Dental , Humans , Models, Dental/standards , Observer Variation , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results , Students, Dental , Surface Properties , Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic/standards
4.
J Dent Educ ; 79(6): 711-8, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26034037

ABSTRACT

The problems associated with intra- and interexaminer reliability when assessing preclinical performance continue to hinder dental educators' ability to provide accurate and meaningful feedback to students. Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the validity of utilizing various technologies to assist educators in achieving that goal. The purpose of this study was to compare two different versions of E4D Compare software to determine if either could be expected to deliver consistent and reliable comparative results, independent of the individual utilizing the technology. Five faculty members obtained E4D digital images of students' attempts (sample model) at ideal gold crown preparations for tooth #30 performed on typodont teeth. These images were compared to an ideal (master model) preparation utilizing two versions of E4D Compare software. The percent correlations between and within these faculty members were recorded and averaged. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure both inter- and intrarater agreement among the examiners. The study found that using the older version of E4D Compare did not result in acceptable intra- or interrater agreement among the examiners. However, the newer version of E4D Compare, when combined with the Nevo scanner, resulted in a remarkable degree of agreement both between and within the examiners. These results suggest that consistent and reliable results can be expected when utilizing this technology under the protocol described in this study.


Subject(s)
Education, Dental , Educational Measurement/methods , Educational Technology , Faculty, Dental/standards , Self-Evaluation Programs , Software , Computer-Aided Design/instrumentation , Crowns/standards , Dentistry, Operative/education , Feedback , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic/standards
6.
J Dent Educ ; 78(1): 40-50, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24385523

ABSTRACT

In order to use CAD CAM (Computer Aided Design, Computer Aided Manufacturing) technology as an assessment tool when evaluating the preclinical performance of dental students, it is imperative that one has confidence in the reliability of the process. In this study, a variety of alignment methods were compared to determine both the consistency and accuracy of each method. Although the "Tooth Dots Diagonal" method exhibited the best precision (coefficient of variation=5.4 percent), it also represented the least accurate method when compared to the other methods tested. Using "Small Dots Diagonal" on the gingiva appears to be the best option, exhibiting an acceptable coefficient of variation (17.6 percent) and a high degree of accuracy in terms of tolerance (mean ± standard deviation=0.163 ± 0.029). Based on the results of this study, further investigation of CAD CAM technology for the purpose of assessment and education of dental students is recommended.


Subject(s)
Computer-Aided Design , Crowns , Schools, Dental , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , Technology, Dental/education , Computer Simulation , Computer-Assisted Instruction/standards , Crowns/standards , Education, Dental , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Models, Dental , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric
8.
J Prosthet Dent ; 104(5): 333-41, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20970540

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Extended contact of impression materials with chemical disinfectant could remove surfactant, significantly altering the contact angle and wettability characteristics of an impression material. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of contact time of chemical disinfectant solution on the dynamic contact angle of a commercial vinyl polysiloxsane impression material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Discs (3.5 × 25 mm) of heavy-body and wash consistencies of material (n=5) were fabricated and either left untreated, or subjected to spray treatment with a commercial disinfectant for various lengths of time (1, 20, or 60 minutes, or 24 hours). Treated specimens were washed and dried, after which dynamic contact angle measurements of a water droplet were determined at various points in time after deposition: 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 seconds. The same wash product was used without added surfactant (control). For a given type of impression material, contact angles were subjected to 1-way ANOVA within each droplet deposition time for all periods of disinfectant contact (α=.05). The Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was applied for pairwise means comparisons. RESULTS: For each impression material type, significant increases in contact angles were found as the duration of disinfectant contact increased, at each measured droplet deposition time point. For both materials containing surfactant, extended contact with chemical disinfectant resulted in increased contact angles that were not significantly different from those of the nonsurfactant-containing control product. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the contact time between a surfactant-containing impression material and a disinfecting solution can significantly alter the resulting contact angle of the impression material and render it similar to a material depleted of surfactant. Following manufacturer-recommended chemical disinfection times reduces surfactant loss and only minimally affects surface wettability.


Subject(s)
Dental Disinfectants , Dental Impression Materials , Hypochlorous Acid , Polyvinyls , Siloxanes , Analysis of Variance , Dental Disinfectants/chemistry , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surface-Active Agents , Time Factors , Wettability
10.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 21(1): 19-24; discussion 25, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19207453

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The importance of provisional restorations is often downplayed, as they are thought of by some as only "temporaries." As a result, a less-than-ideal provisional is sometimes fabricated, in part because of the additional chair time required to make provisional modifications when using traditional techniques. Additionally, in many dental practices, these provisional restorations are often fabricated by auxillary personnel who may not be as well trained in the fabrication process. Because provisionals play an important role in achieving the desired final functional and esthetic result, a high-quality provisional restoration is essential to fabricating a successful definitive restoration. This article describes a method for efficiently and predictably repairing both methacrylate and bis-acryl provisional restorations using flowable composite resin. By use of this relatively simple technique, provisional restorations can now be modified or repaired in a timely and productive manner to yield an exceptional result. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Successful execution of esthetic and restorative dentistry requires attention to detail in every aspect of the case. Fabrication of high-quality provisional restorations can, at times, be challenging and time consuming. The techniques for optimizing resin provisional restorations as described in this paper are pragmatic and will enhance the delivery of dental treatment.


Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis Repair/methods , Dental Restoration, Temporary , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Cementation/methods , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Etching , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Polishing , Esthetics, Dental , Humans , Surface Properties
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...