Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Hosp Pediatr ; 13(1): 47-54, 2023 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36514893

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Postdischarge phone calls can identify discharge errors and gather information following hospital-to-home transitions. This study used the multisite Project IMPACT (Improving Pediatric Patient Centered Care Transitions) dataset to identify factors associated with postdischarge phone call attempt and connectivity. METHODS: This study included 0- to 18-year-old patients discharged from 4 sites between January 2014 and December 2017. We compared demographic and clinical factors between postdischarge call attempt and no-attempt and connectivity and no-connectivity subgroups and used mixed model logistic regression to identify significant independent predictors of call attempt and connectivity. RESULTS: Postdischarge calls were attempted for 5528 of 7725 (71.6%) discharges with successful connection for 3801 of 5528 (68.8%) calls. Connection rates varied significantly among sites (52% to 79%, P < .001). Age less than 30 days (P = .03; P = .01) and age 1 to 6 years (P = .04; P = .04) were independent positive predictors for both call attempt and connectivity, whereas English as preferred language (P < .001) and the chronic noncomplex clinical risk group (P = .02) were independent positive predictors for call attempt and connectivity, respectively. In contrast, readmission within 3 days (P = .004) and federal or state payor (P = .02) were negative independent predictors for call attempt and call connectivity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that targeted interventions may improve postdischarge call attempt rates, such as investment in a reliable call model or improvement in interpreter use, and connectivity, such as enhanced population-based communication.


Subject(s)
Aftercare , Patient Discharge , Humans , Child , Infant , Child, Preschool , Infant, Newborn , Adolescent , Continuity of Patient Care , Patient Readmission , Telephone
2.
Pediatrics ; 148(4)2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34593650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Factorial design of a natural experiment was used to quantify the benefit of individual and combined bundle elements from a 4-element discharge transition bundle (checklist, teach-back, handoff to outpatient providers, and postdischarge phone call) on 30-day readmission rates (RRs). METHODS: A 24 factorial design matrix of 4 bundle element combinations was developed by using patient data (N = 7725) collected from January 2014 to December 2017 from 4 hospitals. Patients were classified into 3 clinical risk groups (CRGs): no chronic disease (CRG1), single chronic condition (CRG2), and complex chronic condition (CRG3). Estimated main effects of each bundle element and their interactions were evaluated by using Study-It software. Because of variation in subgroup size, important effects from the factorial analysis were determined by using weighted effect estimates. RESULTS: RR in CRG1 was 3.5% (n = 4003), 4.1% in CRG2 (n = 1936), and 17.6% in CRG3 (n = 1786). Across the 3 CRGs, the number of subjects in the factorial groupings ranged from 16 to 674. The single most effective element in reducing RR was the checklist in CRG1 and CRG2 (reducing RR by 1.3% and 3.0%) and teach-back in CRG3 (by 4.7%) The combination of teach-back plus a checklist had the greatest effect on reducing RR in CRG3 by 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of bundle elements varied across risk groups, indicating that transition needs may vary on the basis of population. The combined use of teach-back plus a checklist had the greatest impact on reducing RR for medically complex patients.


Subject(s)
Child, Hospitalized , Patient Care Bundles/methods , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Aftercare , Ambulatory Care , Checklist , Child , Child, Preschool , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Teach-Back Communication
3.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 6(3): e407, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33977195

ABSTRACT

Time of medication delivery from the onset of illness is one factor that determines disease outcomes. In this study, we aimed to reduce the average time from admission to the first dose of antibiotic by at least 30% and increase the percentage of neonates receiving the first antibiotic dose within 1 hour of neonatal intensive care unit arrival to 50% over 12 months in asymptomatic neonates 34 weeks and older estimated gestational age with exposure to maternal chorioamnionitis as a sample population. METHOD: This study involved 135 infants 34 weeks and older gestational age exposed to chorioamnionitis. We documented the demographic characteristics of mothers and infants. We monitored time to the administration of the first dose of antibiotics through multiple plan-do-study-act cycles. We identified barriers to timely antibiotic administration and targeted them with multipronged interventions in plan-do-study-act cycles. Process measures were displayed monthly using X-bar/S control charts and P charts. We applied established rules for detecting a special cause. RESULTS: We reduced the meantime to the first dose of antibiotics from 130 to 78 minutes (40% reduction). The percentage of infants who received the first antibiotic dose within 60 minutes rose from 5.8% to 36.3% during the study period. Special cause improvement was seen in all process measures. The most significant improvement seen was in the time to obtain a blood culture and the interval between intravenous access placement and antibiotic delivery. CONCLUSION: Multipronged interventions can help improve timely medication delivery to neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit in this example of infants exposed to chorioamnionitis.

4.
BMJ Open Qual ; 10(1)2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33472852

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients are at increased risk for handoff communication failures due to complexity and prolonged length of stay. We report a quality initiative aimed at reducing avoidable interruptions during neonatal handoffs while monitoring handoff duration and provider satisfaction. METHODS: Observational time series between August 2015 and March 2018 in an academic level IV NICU. NICU I-PASS and process changes were implemented using plan-do-study-act cycle, and statistical process control charts were used in the analysis. Unmatched preintervention and postintervention satisfaction surveys were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: There was special cause variation in the mean number of avoidable interruptions per handoff from 4 to 0.3 (92% reduction). The mean duration of handoff was reduced ~1 min/patient. Provider satisfaction with the quality of handoffs also improved from a mean of 3.36 to 3.75 on a 1-5 Likert scale (p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Standardisation of NICU handoff with NICU I-PASS and process changes led to the sustained reduction in avoidable interruptions with the added benefit of reduced handoff length and improved provider satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Patient Handoff , Communication , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Personal Satisfaction , Quality Improvement
5.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 794710, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34988042

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Despite the advantages of umbilical cord blood culture (UCBC) use for diagnosis of early onset sepsis (EOS), contamination rates have deterred neonatologists from its widespread use. We aimed to implement UCBC collection in a level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and apply quality improvement (QI) methods to reduce contamination in the diagnosis of early onset sepsis. Methods: Single-center implementation study utilizing quality improvement methodology to achieve 0% contamination rate in UCBC samples using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model for improvement. UCBC was obtained in conjunction with peripheral blood cultures (PBC) in neonates admitted to the NICU due to maternal chorioamnionitis. Maternal and neonatal characteristics between clinical sepsis and asymptomatic groups were compared. Process, outcome, and balancing measures were monitored. Results: Eighty-two UCBC samples were collected in addition to peripheral blood culture from neonates admitted due to maternal chorioamnionitis. Ten (12%) neonates had a diagnosis of clinical sepsis. All PBCs were negative and 5 UCBCs were positive in the study period. After 2 PDSA cycles, there was special cause variation with improvement in the percent of contaminated samples from 7.3 to 0%. There was no change in antibiotic duration among asymptomatic neonates. Conclusions: Implementation of UCBC for the diagnosis of EOS in term infants is feasible and contamination can be minimized with the implementation of a core team of trained providers and a proper sterile technique without increasing antibiotic duration.

6.
J Perinatol ; 38(5): 574-579, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29740184

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore the beliefs regarding palliative care team utilization, as well as increase consultation and awareness of the palliative care team's role in the NICU. STUDY DESIGN: The study design in this Level 4 NICU included observational time series with multiple planned sequential interventions. Medical chart review was conducted to determine eligibility, and statistical process control charts were used to show performance over time. RESULTS: Prior to implementation of the triggers, 26% received consultation, which increased to 46% after implementation. There was an increase in level of understanding, knowledge of team's role, and improved utilization. The time until initial consultation decreased from ~1.5 months to 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a 20% increase in consultations. Key interventions included continual education, reminders, and clear postage of the trigger list. Written guidelines increase awareness of a palliative care team's role within a NICU, and provider satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Palliative Care/standards , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Personal Satisfaction
7.
Am J Perinatol ; 35(4): 336-344, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29020695

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test whether implementing a guideline for nonemergent intubation improves the rate of premedication for nonemergent intubations in an academic level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We further sought to test the hypothesis that neonates who receive premedication for a nonemergent intubation have decreased pain scores at the time of intubation, fewer intubation attempts, and no associated adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study with ongoing audit and feedback as well as statistical process control analysis. Data collection began on October 1, 2014. Clinical guideline implementation began in October 2015. A percent "P"-chart spanning seven-quarters was constructed with statistical process control analysis plotting premedication rates over time. Student's t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The mean number of nonemergent intubations given premedications increased from 34 to 82%. The mean pain score was lower when premedications were given: 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.58) versus 2.8 (95% CI: 1.9-3.6) (p < 0.001). The number of intubation attempts did not differ with premedications. CONCLUSION: Adopting a guideline with supporting educational initiatives to standardize premedication before nonemergent intubations increased this practice. This regimen lowered clinical pain scores with no difference in the number of intubation attempts.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care, Neonatal/standards , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Pain/prevention & control , Premedication/statistics & numerical data , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pain/etiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Quality Improvement/organization & administration
8.
Pediatrics ; 139(3)2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28202769

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To improve hospital to home transitions, a 4-element pediatric patient-centered transition bundle was developed, including: a transition readiness checklist; predischarge teach-back education; timely and complete written handoff to the primary care provider; and a postdischarge phone call. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of bundle implementation and report initial outcomes at 4 pilot sites. Outcome measures included postdischarge caregiver ability to teach-back key home management information and 30-day reuse rates. METHODS: A multisite, observational time series using multiple planned sequential interventions to implement bundle components with non-technology-supported and technology-supported patients. Data were collected via electronic health record reviews and during postdischarge phone calls. Statistical process control charts were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Four pilot sites implemented the bundle between January 2014 and May 2015 for 2601 patients, of whom 1394 had postdischarge telephone encounters. Improvement was noted in the implementation of all bundle elements with the transitions readiness checklist posing the greatest feasibility challenge. Phone contact connection rates were 69%. Caregiver ability to teach-back essential home management information postdischarge improved from 18% to 82%. No improvement was noted in reuse rates, which differed dramatically between technology-supported and non-technology-supported patients. CONCLUSIONS: A pediatric care transition bundle was successfully tested and implemented, as demonstrated by improvement in all process measures, as well as caregiver home management skills. Important considerations for successful implementation and evaluation of the discharge bundle include the role of local context, electronic health record integration, and subgroup analysis for technology-supported patients.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Patient Care Bundles , Patient Discharge , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Handoff , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Telephone , United States
9.
Acad Pediatr ; 15(1): 61-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25444655

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Effective communication between inpatient and outpatient providers may mitigate risks of adverse events associated with hospital discharge. However, there is an absence of pediatric literature defining effective discharge communication strategies at both freestanding children's hospitals and general hospitals. The objectives of this study were to assess associations between pediatric primary care providers' (PCPs) reported receipt of discharge communication and referral hospital type, and to describe PCPs' perspectives regarding effective discharge communication and areas for improvement. METHODS: We administered a questionnaire to PCPs referring to 16 pediatric hospital medicine programs nationally. Multivariable models were developed to assess associations between referral hospital type and receipt and completeness of discharge communication. Open-ended questions asked respondents to describe effective strategies and areas requiring improvement regarding discharge communication. Conventional qualitative content analysis was performed to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: Responses were received from 201 PCPs, for a response rate of 63%. Although there were no differences between referral hospital type and PCP-reported receipt of discharge communication (relative risk 1.61, 95% confidence interval 0.97-2.67), PCPs referring to general hospitals more frequently reported completeness of discharge communication relative to those referring to freestanding children's hospitals (relative risk 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.51). Analysis of free text responses yielded 4 major themes: 1) structured discharge communication, 2) direct personal communication, 3) reliability and timeliness of communication, and 4) communication for effective postdischarge care. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights potential differences in the experiences of PCPs referring to general hospitals and freestanding children's hospitals, and presents valuable contextual data for future quality improvement initiatives.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Communication , Hospitals, General , Hospitals, Pediatric , Patient Discharge Summaries , Patient Discharge , Pediatrics , Physicians, Primary Care , Hospitalization , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , Physicians, Family , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Pediatrics ; 135(1): 164-75, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25489017

ABSTRACT

The Seamless Transitions and (Re)admissions Network (STARNet) met in December 2012 to synthesize ongoing hospital-to-home transition work, discuss goals, and develop a plan to centralize transition information in the future. STARNet participants consisted of experts in the field of pediatric hospital medicine quality improvement and research, and included physicians and key stakeholders from hospital groups, private payers, as well as representatives from current transition collaboratives. In this report, we (1) review the current knowledge regarding hospital-to-home transitions; (2) outline the challenges of measuring and reducing readmissions; and (3) highlight research gaps and list potential measures for transition quality. STARNet met with the support of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Quality Improvement Innovation Networks and the Section on Hospital Medicine.


Subject(s)
Patient Discharge , Quality Improvement , Child , Humans , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data
11.
Hosp Pediatr ; 4(1): 9-15, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24435595

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Professional medical societies endorse prompt, consistent discharge communication to primary care providers (PCPs) on discharge. However, evidence is limited about what clinical elements to communicate. Our main goal was to identify and compare the clinical elements considered by PCPs and pediatric hospitalists to be essential to communicate to PCPs within 2 days of pediatric hospital discharge. A secondary goal was to describe experiences of the PCPs and pediatric hospitalists regarding sending and receiving discharge information. METHODS: A survey of physician preferences and experiences regarding discharge communication was sent to 320 PCPs who refer patients to 16 hospitals, with an analogous survey sent to 147 hospitalists. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and χ² analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 201 PCPs (63%) and 71 hospitalists (48%) responded to the survey. Seven clinical elements were reported as essential by >75% of both PCPs and hospitalists: dates of admission and discharge; discharge diagnoses; brief hospital course; discharge medications; immunizations given during hospitalization; pending laboratory or test results; and follow-up appointments. PCPs reported reliably receiving discharge communication significantly less often than hospitalists reported sending it (71.8% vs 85.1%; P < .01), and PCPs considered this communication to be complete significantly less often than hospitalists did (64.9% vs 79.1%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: We identified 7 core clinical elements that PCPs and hospitalists consider essential in discharge communication. Consistently and promptly communicating at least these core elements after discharge may enhance PCP satisfaction and patient-level outcomes. Reported rates of transmission and receipt of this information were suboptimal and should be targeted for improvement.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Hospital Distribution Systems/organization & administration , Physicians, Primary Care , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitalists , Humans
12.
Hosp Pediatr ; 3(3): 258-65, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24313096

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The transition of care from hospital to primary care provider (PCP) at discharge carries the potential for significant information loss. There is evidence that the timeliness and content of discharge communication are often unreliable during this handoff. Suboptimal transitions of care at discharge have been associated with adverse outcomes, and efficient solutions are required to transform the current state. Our specific aim was the achievement 90% documentation of hospitalist-PCP communication within 2 days of hospital discharge in < 12 months. METHODS: As part of a grassroots collaborative improvement organization, pediatric hospitalist groups engaged in parallel quality improvement projects to improve the timeliness and reliability of discharge communication at their local institutions. After an initial face-to-face meeting, e-mail and regular conference calls were used to promote shared effort and learning. The study period lasted 12 months, with > 16 weeks of continuous data required for inclusion. RESULTS: The mean rate of documentation of timely discharge communication across the collaborative increased from 57% to 85% over the study period. For the 7 hospitals that were able to collect > 16 weeks of data before July 2010, the mean rate of communication was > 90%. Participants reported that the context of the collaborative contributed to their success. CONCLUSIONS: Timely hospitalist-PCP communication was inconsistent at the beginning of the study. This low-resource quality improvement collaborative was able to achieve rapid improvement and resulted in improved perceptions of quality improvement knowledge among participants.


Subject(s)
Communication , Hospital Medicine/methods , Patient Discharge Summaries/standards , Patient Handoff/standards , Pediatrics/methods , Primary Health Care , Cooperative Behavior , Documentation/standards , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Quality Improvement , Time Factors
13.
Hosp Pediatr ; 1(1): 46-50, 2011 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24510929

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Fever without source (FWS) in children 3-36 months is a common presenting complaint. Because of changes in immunization practices and their effects on rates of bacteremia, older guidelines may no longer be applicable. We reviewed the literature regarding the necessity of obtaining a blood culture in non-toxic children in this age group with FWS. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a MEDLINE search on the topic of bacteremia in febrile children 3-36 months from 2004-present. RESULTS: Eight studies were included. Although the studies varied in terms of approach and analysis, all suggested a rate of bacteremia in a non-toxic, febrile child 3-36 months of age to be less than 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Strong consideration should be given for foregoing blood culture in a non-toxic child 3-36 months of age with FWS.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...