Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 14(9): e1006435, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30222735

ABSTRACT

The capacity to learn abstract concepts such as 'sameness' and 'difference' is considered a higher-order cognitive function, typically thought to be dependent on top-down neocortical processing. It is therefore surprising that honey bees apparantly have this capacity. Here we report a model of the structures of the honey bee brain that can learn sameness and difference, as well as a range of complex and simple associative learning tasks. Our model is constrained by the known connections and properties of the mushroom body, including the protocerebral tract, and provides a good fit to the learning rates and performances of real bees in all tasks, including learning sameness and difference. The model proposes a novel mechanism for learning the abstract concepts of 'sameness' and 'difference' that is compatible with the insect brain, and is not dependent on top-down or executive control processing.


Subject(s)
Bees/physiology , Brain/physiology , Cognition , Mushroom Bodies/physiology , Neural Networks, Computer , Animals , Behavior, Animal , Computer Simulation , Learning , Machine Learning , Models, Neurological , Odorants , Probability , Software
2.
PLoS One ; 13(4): e0196749, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29709023

ABSTRACT

Brain structure and learning capacities both vary with experience, but the mechanistic link between them is unclear. Here, we investigated whether experience-dependent variability in learning performance can be explained by neuroplasticity in foraging honey bees. The mushroom bodies (MBs) are a brain center necessary for ambiguous olfactory learning tasks such as reversal learning. Using radio frequency identification technology, we assessed the effects of natural variation in foraging activity, and the age when first foraging, on both performance in reversal learning and on synaptic connectivity in the MBs. We found that reversal learning performance improved at foraging onset and could decline with greater foraging experience. If bees started foraging before the normal age, as a result of a stress applied to the colony, the decline in learning performance with foraging experience was more severe. Analyses of brain structure in the same bees showed that the total number of synaptic boutons at the MB input decreased when bees started foraging, and then increased with greater foraging intensity. At foraging onset MB structure is therefore optimized for bees to update learned information, but optimization of MB connectivity deteriorates with foraging effort. In a computational model of the MBs sparser coding of information at the MB input improved reversal learning performance. We propose, therefore, a plausible mechanistic relationship between experience, neuroplasticity, and cognitive performance in a natural and ecological context.


Subject(s)
Bees/physiology , Feeding Behavior , Learning , Neuronal Plasticity , Presynaptic Terminals/physiology , Animals , Behavior, Animal , Brain/physiology , Cognition , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Models, Statistical , Mushroom Bodies/physiology , Radio Frequency Identification Device , Radio Waves , Software , Synapses/physiology
3.
PLoS One ; 12(2): e0172325, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28241061

ABSTRACT

The insect central complex (CX) is an enigmatic structure whose computational function has evaded inquiry, but has been implicated in a wide range of behaviours. Recent experimental evidence from the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) and the cockroach (Blaberus discoidalis) has demonstrated the existence of neural activity corresponding to the animal's orientation within a virtual arena (a neural 'compass'), and this provides an insight into one component of the CX structure. There are two key features of the compass activity: an offset between the angle represented by the compass and the true angular position of visual features in the arena, and the remapping of the 270° visual arena onto an entire circle of neurons in the compass. Here we present a computational model which can reproduce this experimental evidence in detail, and predicts the computational mechanisms that underlie the data. We predict that both the offset and remapping of the fly's orientation onto the neural compass can be explained by plasticity in the synaptic weights between segments of the visual field and the neurons representing orientation. Furthermore, we predict that this learning is reliant on the existence of neural pathways that detect rotational motion across the whole visual field and uses this rotation signal to drive the rotation of activity in a neural ring attractor. Our model also reproduces the 'transitioning' between visual landmarks seen when rotationally symmetric landmarks are presented. This model can provide the basis for further investigation into the role of the central complex, which promises to be a key structure for understanding insect behaviour, as well as suggesting approaches towards creating fully autonomous robotic agents.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal , Computer Simulation , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Orientation/physiology , Algorithms , Animals , Brain/physiology , Cockroaches/physiology , Flight, Animal/physiology , Models, Statistical , Neural Pathways , Neurons/physiology , Neurotransmitter Agents/physiology , Rotation , Software
4.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 12(5): e1004887, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27148968

ABSTRACT

We present a novel neurally based model for estimating angular velocity (AV) in the bee brain, capable of quantitatively reproducing experimental observations of visual odometry and corridor-centering in free-flying honeybees, including previously unaccounted for manipulations of behaviour. The model is fitted using electrophysiological data, and tested using behavioural data. Based on our model we suggest that the AV response can be considered as an evolutionary extension to the optomotor response. The detector is tested behaviourally in silico with the corridor-centering paradigm, where bees navigate down a corridor with gratings (square wave or sinusoidal) on the walls. When combined with an existing flight control algorithm the detector reproduces the invariance of the average flight path to the spatial frequency and contrast of the gratings, including deviations from perfect centering behaviour as found in the real bee's behaviour. In addition, the summed response of the detector to a unit distance movement along the corridor is constant for a large range of grating spatial frequencies, demonstrating that the detector can be used as a visual odometer.


Subject(s)
Bees/physiology , Flight, Animal/physiology , Models, Neurological , Algorithms , Animals , Brain/physiology , Computational Biology , Computer Simulation , Motion Perception/physiology , User-Computer Interface
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...