Is a preoperative group and save necessary for enhanced recovery joint replacement patients?

AIM: To consider the financial benefit to the authors' trust of omitting a preoperative group and save in enhanced recovery arthroplasty patients, and to estimate the scope for national savings. Patient safety was considered to determine acceptability for routine practice. METHODS: A total of 121 patients receiving a total knee replacement or total hip replacement on the authors' enhanced recovery protocol were selected. Pre- and postoperative haemoglobin levels were obtained. The transfusion team were contacted when the postoperative haemoglobin level was ≤8 g/dl to determine whether blood products had been issued. Costs for group and save were obtained from the pathology department. RESULTS: Mean postoperative reduction in haemoglobin level was 2.6 g/dl (P≤0.001) and 2.1 g/dl (P≤0.001) for total hip replacement and total knee replacement respectively. No patients were transfused. One group and save costs £12.00, and omission of this test in these patients would have saved £1452.00. Potentially, £1 605 408 could have been saved in the 133 784 patients undergoing NHS arthroplasty in 2012. Group and save omission would not affect management of intraoperative haemorrhage where O negative blood would be available. If a transfusion is required postoperatively it would take 100 minutes to issue crossmatched blood - a time delay unlikely to compromise patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a preoperative group and save could be omitted in arthroplasty patients on this enhanced recovery programme to prevent needless expenditure, but more long-term follow up is required to ensure patients are not put at risk.

Measuring tip-apex distance using a picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

BACKGROUND: The sliding hip screw is currently the most frequently used prosthesis used to fix trochanteric fractures of the hip. The 'tip-apex distance' (TAD) has been found to be predictive of hardware failure, with a larger TAD being associated with an increasing risk of 'cut-out'. Previous studies have either used 'hard-copy' radiographs and geometrical aids or a mixture of scanned hard-copy images and extra software to measure TAD. The current study describes a new method of tip-apex distance estimation using an entirely digital picture archiving and communication system (PACS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten radiographs were measured for TAD by four surgeons of differing experience using the described measurement protocol, at two different time points (4 weeks apart). The results were then subjected to two-tailed t-tests to determine if they differed significantly. RESULTS: No tests attained significance (i.e. no statistical difference existed between the observers' measurements and no difference existed over time from a single observer's results). CONCLUSION: This study shows that TAD can be easily, accurately and, importantly, reproducibly measured using an entirely digitally based image capture and archiving system. The ease with which the measurements and calculations can be made will facilitate orthopaedic practitioners and trauma units in their auditing activities, and allows for quick TAD estimation in the 'X-ray meeting' environment.