Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr ; 166(4): 819-26.e1-2, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25641238

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine racial/ethnic-specific survival of children with major birth defects in the US. STUDY DESIGN: We pooled data on live births delivered during 1999-2007 with any of 21 birth defects from 12 population-based birth defects surveillance programs. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate cumulative survival probabilities and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate mortality risk. RESULTS: For most birth defects, there were small-to-moderate differences in neonatal (<28 days) survival among racial/ethnic groups. However, compared with children born to non-Hispanic white mothers, postneonatal infant (28 days to <1 year) mortality risk was significantly greater among children born to non-Hispanic black mothers for 13 of 21 defects (hazard ratios [HRs] 1.3-2.8) and among children born to Hispanic mothers for 10 of 21 defects (HRs 1.3-1.7). Compared with children born to non-Hispanic white mothers, a significantly increased childhood (≤ 8 years) mortality risk was found among children born to Asian/Pacific Islander mothers for encephalocele (HR 2.6), tetralogy of Fallot, and atrioventricular septal defect (HRs 1.6-1.8) and among children born to American Indian/Alaska Native mothers for encephalocele (HR 2.8), whereas a significantly decreased childhood mortality risk was found among children born to Asian/Pacific Islander mothers for cleft lip with or without cleft palate (HR 0.6). CONCLUSION: Children with birth defects born to non-Hispanic black and Hispanic mothers carry a greater risk of mortality well into childhood, especially children with congenital heart defect. Understanding survival differences among racial/ethnic groups provides important information for policy development and service planning.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/ethnology , Ethnicity , Population Surveillance , Risk Assessment/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , United States/epidemiology
2.
J Pediatr ; 159(1): 57-63, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21349542

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze survival patterns among infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) in the State of Michigan. STUDY DESIGN: Cases of HLHS prevalent at live birth were identified and confirmed within the Michigan Birth Defects Registry from 1992 to 2005 (n=406). Characteristics of infants with HLHS were compared with a 10:1 random control sample. RESULTS: Compared with 4060 control subjects, the 406 cases of HLHS were more frequently male (62.6% vs 51.4%), born prematurely (<37 weeks gestation; 15.3% vs 8.7%), and born at low birth weight (LBW) (<2.5 kg; 16.0% vs 6.6%). HLHS 1-year survival rate improved over the study period (P=.041). Chromosomal abnormalities, LBW, premature birth, and living in a high poverty neighborhood were significantly associated with death. Controlling for neighborhood poverty, term infants versus preterm with HLHS or LBW were 3.2 times (95% CI: 1.9-5.3; P<.001) more likely to survive at least 1 year. Controlling for age and weight, infants from low-poverty versus high-poverty areas were 1.8 times (95% CI: 1.1-2.8; P=.015) more likely to survive at least 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Among infants with HLHS in Michigan, those who were premature, LBW, had chromosomal abnormalities, or lived in a high-poverty area were at increased risk for early death.


Subject(s)
Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome/mortality , Case-Control Studies , Chromosome Aberrations/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Linear Models , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Patient Transfer , Poverty , Premature Birth , Registries , Sex Distribution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL