Transradial versus tibiopedal access approach for endovascular intervention of superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Improved equipment and techniques have resulted in transition from surgical bypass to endovascular intervention to treat superficial femoral artery (SFA) chronic total occlusions (CTO). A change in access site to radial (TRA) or tibiopedal (TPA) artery for the treatment of these SFA CTO has been reported. The feasibility, efficacy and safety of these two access sites for treatment of SFA CTO have not been reported. METHODS: We performed an as treated analysis of 184 SFA CTO interventions in 161 patients from 01/2014 to 09/2016 using either primary TRA or TPA (operator discretion) at two institutions. Primary end point was 30 day major adverse event (MAE) - death, amputation or target vessel revascularization, secondary endpoint was success of procedure. RESULTS: Primary TRA was used in 46 patients with 47 CTO lesions .Primary TPA was used in 115 patients with 137 CTO lesions. Primary crossing success rate was higher with TRA compared to TPA (74% vs 54%, P = 0.01). Dual TRA-TPA was required in 72 prior uncrossed lesions resulting in a crossing and procedural success of 99% and 96% respectively. The overall crossing and procedural success rate using either of these approaches was 99% and 98% respectively. The 30 day MAE was 5% in TRA arm, 0% in TPA arm and 2% in dual TRA-TPA arm, P = 0.08. All access sites were patent, confirmed by ultrasound. CONCLUSION: The treatment of SFA CTO is feasible and safe using both TRA or TPA approach providing high success rates and no access site complications.

Comparison of Clinical and Electrocardiographic Predictors of Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy During the Initial Evaluation of Patients With Reduced (≤40%) Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Invasive coronary angiography is routinely performed during the initial evaluation of patients with suspected cardiomyopathy with reduced left ventricular function. Clinical and electrocardiographic (ECG) data may accurately predict ischemic cardiomyopathy (IC). Medical records of adults referred for coronary angiography for evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% from 2010 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with myocardial infarction (MI), previous coronary revascularization, cardiac surgery, or left-sided valvular disease were excluded. IC was defined as ≥70% diameter stenosis of the left main, proximal left anterior descending, or involvement of ≥2 epicardial coronary arteries. A risk model was developed from logistic regression coefficients, with a dichotomous cut-point based on the maximal Youden's index from the receiver-operating characteristic curve. A total of 273 patients met study inclusion criteria. Mean age was 56.8 ± 11.6 and 68.1% were men. IC was identified in 41 patients (15%). Patients with IC were more likely to have ECG evidence of Q-wave MI (34% vs 13%, p <0.001) and less likely to have left bundle branch block (2% vs 15%, p = 0.03) than non-IC. A model including age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, ECG evidence of ST or T-wave abnormalities concerning for ischemia, and previous Q-wave MI, yielded a 95% negative predictive value for IC. In conclusion, at an urban referral hospital, the prevalence of IC was low. Left bundle branch block on electrocardiography was rarely associated with IC. A risk score incorporating clinical and ECG abnormalities identified patients at a low likelihood for IC.

Influence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Seropositive Status on the In-Hospital Management and Outcomes of Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive individuals are predisposed to acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to evaluate management strategies and outcomes of AMI in patients with HIV in the contemporary era. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2011 for patients admitted with AMI with or without HIV. Propensity-score matching was used to identify HIV seropositive AMI patients with similar characteristics who were managed invasively (cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], or coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG]) or conservatively. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among 1,363,570 patients admitted with AMI, 3788 (0.28%) were HIV seropositive. The frequency of HIV diagnosis among AMI patients increased over time (0.20% in 2002 to 0.35% in 2011; P for trend <.001). Patients with HIV had lower odds of invasive management (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.65) and were less likely to undergo CABG (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.76) or receive drug-eluting stents (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92) than HIV-seronegative patients. Patients with HIV had higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13-1.64) than those without HIV. In a propensity-matched cohort of 1608 patients with HIV treated for AMI with invasive vs conservative management, invasive management was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs 8.2%; P<.001; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities exist in management of AMI by HIV status. HIV seropositive patients were less likely to receive invasive management, CABG, and drug-eluting stents, and had higher in-hospital mortality vs patients without HIV.

Innovative use of a guideliner catheter to assist in snare retrieval of an entrapped kinked guide catheter during transradial coronary intervention.

Rescue techniques that enable removal of severe intravascular catheter kinking are always worthwhile. We herein demonstrate the novel employment of a GuideLiner support catheter to assist in the removal of a kinked and entrapped guide catheter within the radial artery during coronary intervention. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Delayed occurrence of radial artery pseudoaneurysm following transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.

Radial artery pseudoaneurysm is rare following transradial catheterization procedures. In this article, we report a 5-month delay in the occurrence of this vascular complication following the completion of transradial coronary intervention in a subject without any underlying vasculitis, representing the longest time lag thus far described. .

Transradial access for peripheral vascular interventions.

Transradial access for coronary interventions has grown substantially in the last few years. Currently, there is an increased interest in applying this approach to peripheral vascular interventions. This report reviews the current status of transradial peripheral interventions, and offers advice in terms of feasibility, equipment use, and technical challenges.

Noninvasive assessment of HIV-related coronary artery disease.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy has led to significant declines in infection-related mortality in HIV-infected patients. Cardiovascular disease has emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population, and is likely related to both an increased prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and HIV-specific factors associated with antiretroviral therapy, chronic inflammation, and direct viral effects. Accurate clinical assessment of cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected patients is a critical challenge now facing practitioners. Multiple modes of noninvasive vascular imaging are available to enhance the ability to identify patients at high cardiovascular risk, and may ultimately assist in targeting use of intensive medical therapy to reduce cardiac events in this population. This review will examine several of these noninvasive tests and is intended to aid practitioners making cardiovascular risk assessments in HIV patients.

Transradial approach to lower extremity interventions.

Percutaneous interventions of the coronary and peripheral vessels have historically been performed using a femoral artery approach. There has been increasing recognition of post-procedural bleeding complications and its impact on short- and long-term mortality. Because of its now recognized safety, the transradial approach has recently emerged as a preferred method compared to the transfemoral approach. The limitations associated with the distance from the puncture site to the lesion location are being addressed as new tools are developed for the endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease. In this review, we discuss the many facets of the transradial approach to lower extremity endovascular interventions, highlighting its safety and efficacy. Approaches to special populations including individuals with prior surgical bypass, Leriche's syndrome, and those committed to chronic anticoagulation are also reviewed.

A novel approach to left atrial appendage exclusion: the WATCHMAN device.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), a very common cardiac arrhythmia, is a well-recognized predisposing factor for embolic stroke. While warfarin remains the cornerstone of anticoagulant treatment in patients with AF, it is often underutilized because of increased bleeding complications and frequent monitoring requirements. It has been documented that the left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of left atrial thrombus that causes strokes in AF patients. Thus, closure of the LAA may be an effective strategy in stroke reduction. Several devices have been used in closure of the LAA. The WATCHMAN device appears to be a safe and efficacious device for closure of the LAA as recently demonstrated in the PROTECT AF trial.

Transradial peripheral vascular interventions.

Recently the importance of post procedure bleeding contributing to both short-term and long-term mortality has lead to a renewed interest in transradial coronary interventions in the United States. It has been long known that the incidence of access site bleeding is dramatically decreased by transradial access but the procedure is only used in 1% of coronary interventions in the United States, far below the rest of the world. In India, Japan and some European centers 50% of interventions are transradial. To extend this benefit of lower incidence of access site complications, we started using a transradial approach for peripheral interventions for the lower extremities, renal and subclavian arteries. By experience, we realized that in many cases the radial approach makes the procedure actually simpler. Also, in many instances, the transradial approach allows discharge of the patient on the same day. In this paper, we describe our approach to lower extremity, renal and subclavian interventional procedures.