Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 176
Filter
1.
J Card Fail ; 30(6): 755-763, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215932

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omecamtiv mecarbil improves outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We examined the relationship between baseline troponin levels, change in troponin levels over time and the treatment effect of omecamtiv mecarbil in patients enrolled in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) trial (NCT02929329). METHODS: GALACTIC-HF was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomized 8256 patients with symptomatic HFrEF to omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo. High-sensitivity troponin I (cTnI) was measured serially at a core laboratory. We analyzed the relationship between both baseline cTnI and change in cTnI concentrations with clinical outcomes and the treatment effect of omecamtiv mecarbil. RESULTS: Higher baseline cTnI concentrations were associated with a risk of adverse outcomes (hazard ratio for the primary endpoint of time to first HF event or CV death = 1.30; 95% CI 1.28, 1.33; P < 0.001 per doubling of baseline cTnI). Although the incidence of safety outcomes was higher in patients with higher baseline cTnI, there was no difference between treatment groups. Treatment with omecamtiv mecarbil led to a modest increase in cTnI that was related to plasma concentrations of omecamtiv mecarbil, and it peaked at 6 weeks. An increase in troponin from baseline to week 6 was associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint (P < 0.001), which was similar, regardless of treatment assignment (P value for interaction = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with HFrEF, baseline cTnI concentrations were strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Although cTnI concentrations were higher in patients treated with omecamtiv mecarbil, we did not find a differential effect of omecamtiv mecarbil on either safety or efficacy based on baseline cTnI status or change in cTnI.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Heart Failure , Stroke Volume , Troponin I , Humans , Male , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/blood , Middle Aged , Aged , Troponin I/blood , Treatment Outcome , Stroke Volume/drug effects , Biomarkers/blood , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Urea/therapeutic use , Urea/pharmacology , Carbamates/therapeutic use
2.
Am J Med ; 137(2): 128-136.e13, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37918777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are underutilized in older patients with atrial fibrillation, despite proven clinical benefits. Our objective was to investigate baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and impact of anticoagulation upon clinical outcomes with respect to age. METHODS: Adults with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation were recruited into the prospective observational registry, GARFIELD-AF, and followed up for 24 months. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were obtained via Cox proportional-hazards models with applied weights, to quantify the association of age with clinical outcomes. Comparative effectiveness of OAC vs No OAC and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were assessed using a propensity score with an overlap weighting scheme. RESULTS: Of 52,018 patients, 32.6% were 65-74 years of age, 29.3% were 75-84 years, and 7.9% were ≥85 years. OAC treatment was associated with a numerical reduction in all-cause mortality among those aged 65-74 years (HR; 95% confidence interval) (0.86; 0.69-1.06) and aged 75-84 years (0.89; 0.75-1.05) and a significant reduction in patients ≥85 years (0.77; 0.63-0.95) vs no OAC. Similarly, OACs were associated with a decrease in stroke: 65-74 (0.51; 0.35-0.76) and ≥85 years (0.58; 0.34-0.99) and a numerical decrease in 75-84 years (0.84; 0.59-1.18). No increase in major bleeding was observed in patients aged ≥85 treated with OACs. Compared with VKA, NOACs were associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality in patients aged <65 and 65-74, with numerical reductions in those aged 75-84 and ≥85 years. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients using OACs saw lower all-cause mortality and stroke risk; NOACs had less mortality and major bleeding compared with VKAs.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Adult , Humans , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/chemically induced , Anticoagulants , Administration, Oral , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/complications , Registries , Risk Factors
3.
Expert Opin Ther Targets ; 27(3): 207-223, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36880349

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) is a transmembrane sialoglycoprotein detected in activated endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells involved in the adhesion and transmigration of inflammatory cells into damaged tissue. Widely used as a pro-inflammatory marker, its potential role as a targeting molecule has not been thoroughly explored. AREAS COVERED: We discuss the current evidence supporting the potential targeting of VCAM-1 in atherosclerosis, diabetes, hypertension and ischemia/reperfusion injury. EXPERT OPINION: There is emerging evidence that VCAM-1 is more than a biomarker and may be a promising therapeutic target for vascular diseases. While there are neutralizing antibodies that allow preclinical research, the development of pharmacological tools to activate or inhibit this protein are required to thoroughly assess its therapeutic potential.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Reperfusion Injury , Humans , Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/metabolism , Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/therapeutic use , Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Endothelium, Vascular
4.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 151(2): 222-228, feb. 2023. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1522070

ABSTRACT

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and is highly prevalent in elderly patients. It confers a higher risk for ischemic stroke, heart failure and death. The diagnosis and treatment of AF has been extensively studied and remain under constant revision. This article reviews the recent European guidelines and the advances observed with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants in the last ten years. This new family of drugs has clear benefits in terms of efficacy and safety compared with traditional vitamin K antagonists. Treatment of most common comorbidities in patients with AF such as advanced age, heart failure, diabetes, renal failure, and others are also analyzed. New therapies for AF will be shortly available.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Comorbidity , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/adverse effects
5.
Rev Med Chil ; 151(2): 222-228, 2023 Feb.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38293857

ABSTRACT

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and is highly prevalent in elderly patients. It confers a higher risk for ischemic stroke, heart failure and death. The diagnosis and treatment of AF has been extensively studied and remain under constant revision. This article reviews the recent European guidelines and the advances observed with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants in the last ten years. This new family of drugs has clear benefits in terms of efficacy and safety compared with traditional vitamin K antagonists. Treatment of most common comorbidities in patients with AF such as advanced age, heart failure, diabetes, renal failure, and others are also analyzed. New therapies for AF will be shortly available.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Diabetes Mellitus , Heart Failure , Stroke , Humans , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/drug therapy , Administration, Oral
7.
Eur Heart J ; 43(23): 2212-2220, 2022 06 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35325102

ABSTRACT

AIMS: In GALACTIC-HF, the cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil compared with placebo reduced the risk of heart failure events or cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We explored the influence of atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF) on the effectiveness of omecamtiv mecarbil. METHODS AND RESULTS: GALACTIC-HF enrolled patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and elevated natriuretic peptides. We assessed whether the presence or absence of AFF, a pre-specified subgroup, modified the treatment effect for the primary and secondary outcomes, and additionally explored effect modification in patients who were or were not receiving digoxin. Patients with AFF (n = 2245, 27%) were older, more likely to be randomized as an inpatient, less likely to have a history of ischaemic aetiology or myocardial infarction, had a worse NYHA class, worse quality of life, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. The treatment effect of omecamtiv mecarbil was modified by baseline AFF (interaction P = 0.012), with patients without AFF at baseline deriving greater benefit. The worsening of the treatment effect by baseline AFF was significantly more pronounced in digoxin users than in non-users (interaction P = 0.007); there was minimal evidence of effect modification in those patients not using digoxin (P = 0.47) or in digoxin users not in AFF. CONCLUSION: Patients in AFF at baseline were less likely to benefit from omecamtiv mecarbil than patients without AFF, although the attenuation of the treatment effect was disproportionally concentrated in patients with AFF who were also receiving digoxin.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02929329.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Heart Failure , Urea , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Flutter , Digoxin/therapeutic use , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Humans , Quality of Life , Stroke Volume , Urea/adverse effects , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Ventricular Function, Left
9.
Rev. chil. cardiol ; 40(2): 161-165, ago. 2021. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388092

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN: Se presenta una semblanza del Dr. Bernard Lown, uno de los más destacados cardiólogos del siglo XX. Muy relevantes fueron sus estudios sobre arritmias ventriculares e isquemia miocárdica, como también la influencia del estrés sobre el umbral de la fibrilación ventricular. Simultáneamente con otros investigadores europeos desarrolló el cardiovertor eléctrico. Se releva particularmente su condición de gran clínico y el trato humano con sus pacientes. Finalmente, se destaca su contribución a evitar una guerra nuclear por lo cual, junto al Dr Chazov, recibió el Premio Nobel de la Paz.


ABSTRACT: This is a biographical note on Bernard Lown MD, recently deceased. He was one of the foremost cardiologist in the XXth century. Relevant were his studies on ventricular arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia, as well the effect of mental stress in lowering the ventricular arrhythmia threshold. Along with European researchs he developed the electric cardiovertor. Special emphasis is placed on his skills as a clinician and is humane approach to patient care. He contributed to international efforts to prevent nuclear war. For this effort he was awarded, along with Dr Chazov, the Nobel Peace Price.


Subject(s)
History, 20th Century , Cardiology/history , Cardiologists/history , Lithuania
10.
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis ; 1867(9): 166170, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34000374

ABSTRACT

The vascular cellular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) is a protein that canonically participates in the adhesion and transmigration of leukocytes to the interstitium during inflammation. VCAM-1 expression, together with soluble VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1) induced by the shedding of VCAM-1 by metalloproteinases, have been proposed as biomarkers in immunological diseases, cancer, autoimmune myocarditis, and as predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), endothelial injury in patients with coronary artery disease, and arrhythmias. This revision aims to discuss the role of sVCAM-1 as a biomarker to predict the occurrence, development, and preservation of cardiovascular disease.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/metabolism , Cardiovascular Diseases/metabolism , Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/metabolism , Animals , Humans , Myocarditis/metabolism
11.
Am Heart J ; 236: 4-12, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33571477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: ROCKET AF demonstrated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients enrolled in Latin America compared with the rest of the world (ROW). METHODS: ROCKET AF enrolled 14,264 patients from 45 countries. Of these, 1,878 (13.2%) were from 7 Latin American countries. The clinical characteristics and outcomes (adjusted by baseline characteristics) of these patients were compared with 12,293 patients from the ROW. Treatment outcomes of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were also stratified by region. RESULTS: The annual rate of stroke/SE was similar in those from Latin American and ROW (P= .63), but all-cause and vascular death were significantly higher than in ROW (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20-1.64; HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.68; P< .001). Rates of major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding tended to be lower in Latin America (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-1.0; P= .05). Rates of stroke and/or SE were similar with rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients from Latin America and ROW (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.29 vs HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.07; interaction P= .77). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF in Latin America had similar rates of stroke and/or SE, higher rates of vascular death, and lower rates of bleeding compared with patients in the ROW. The effect of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Latin America was similar to the ROW. Further studies analyzing patient- and country-specific determinants of these regional differences in Latin America are warranted.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Embolism , Hemorrhage , Rivaroxaban , Stroke , Warfarin , Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Embolism/ethnology , Embolism/etiology , Embolism/prevention & control , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Hemorrhage/ethnology , Humans , Latin America , Male , Mortality , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Stroke/ethnology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Warfarin/adverse effects
12.
ESC Heart Fail ; 8(2): 1139-1149, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33434417

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) may coexist and influence each other. However, characteristics, anticoagulant treatment, and outcomes of contemporary AF patients with concurrent HF are ill-defined. This study analyses characteristics, treatment, and 2 year outcomes in newly diagnosed Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) patients with vs. without HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: GARFIELD-AF is the world's largest observational AF patient study. At enrolment, 11 758 of 52 072 patients (22.6%) had HF; 76.3% were New York Heart Association class II-III. Patients with HF had comparable demographics, blood pressure, and heart rate but more likely had permanent (15.6% vs. 11.9%) or persistent AF (18.9% vs. 13.8%), acute coronary syndromes (16.7% vs. 8.9%), vascular disease (40.8% vs. 20.2%), and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (14.6% vs. 9.0%) than those without. Anticoagulant prescription was similar between the two groups. At 2 year follow-up, patients with HF showed a greater risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.91-2.21; P < 0.0001], cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.58-3.29; P < 0.0001), acute coronary syndromes (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02-1.52; P = 0.03), and stroke/systemic embolism (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.43; P = 0.0044). Major bleeding rate was comparable (adjusted HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.18; P = 0.968). Among patients without HF at baseline, incidence of new HF was low [0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.75) per 100 person-years], whereas propensity to develop worsening HF was higher in those with HF [1.62 (95% CI, 1.45-1.80) per 100 person-years]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF and HF have a high risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and stroke/systemic embolism and may develop worsening HF.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Heart Failure , Stroke , Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Risk Factors , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology
14.
Future Cardiol ; 17(1): 19-38, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32696663

ABSTRACT

The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the Field-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) examined real-world practice in a total of 57,149 (5069 retrospective, 52,080 prospective) patients with newly diagnosed AF at risk of stroke/systemic embolism, enrolled at over 1000 centers in 35 countries. It aimed to capture data on AF burden, patients' clinical profile, patterns of clinical practice and antithrombotic management, focusing on stroke/systemic embolism prevention, uptake of new oral anticoagulants, impact on death and bleeding. GARFIELD-AF set new standards for quality of data collection and analysis. A total of 36 peer-reviewed articles were already published and 73 abstracts presented at international congresses, covering treatment strategies, geographical variations in baseline risk and therapies, adverse outcomes and common comorbidities such as heart failure. A risk prediction tool as well as innovative observational studies and artificial intelligence methodologies are currently being developed by GARFIELD-AF researchers. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01090362 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Artificial Intelligence , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control
15.
N Engl J Med ; 384(2): 105-116, 2021 01 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33185990

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The selective cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil has been shown to improve cardiac function in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Its effect on cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned 8256 patients (inpatients and outpatients) with symptomatic chronic heart failure and an ejection fraction of 35% or less to receive omecamtiv mecarbil (using pharmacokinetic-guided doses of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, or 50 mg twice daily) or placebo, in addition to standard heart-failure therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of a first heart-failure event (hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure) or death from cardiovascular causes. RESULTS: During a median of 21.8 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 1523 of 4120 patients (37.0%) in the omecamtiv mecarbil group and in 1607 of 4112 patients (39.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 0.99; P = 0.03). A total of 808 patients (19.6%) and 798 patients (19.4%), respectively, died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.11). There was no significant difference between groups in the change from baseline on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score. At week 24, the change from baseline for the median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level was 10% lower in the omecamtiv mecarbil group than in the placebo group; the median cardiac troponin I level was 4 ng per liter higher. The frequency of cardiac ischemic and ventricular arrhythmia events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection, those who received omecamtiv mecarbil had a lower incidence of a composite of a heart-failure event or death from cardiovascular causes than those who received placebo. (Funded by Amgen and others; GALACTIC-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02929329; EudraCT number, 2016-002299-28.).


Subject(s)
Cardiac Myosins/metabolism , Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Failure, Systolic/drug therapy , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Myosins/drug effects , Cardiotonic Agents/adverse effects , Cardiotonic Agents/pharmacology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Female , Heart Failure, Systolic/metabolism , Heart Failure, Systolic/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Contraction/drug effects , Stroke Volume , Urea/adverse effects , Urea/pharmacology , Urea/therapeutic use
16.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 22(11): 2160-2171, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32985088

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The safety and efficacy of the novel selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is being tested in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) trial. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants in GALACTIC-HF and how these compare with other contemporary trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adults with established HFrEF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class ≥II, ejection fraction ≤35%, elevated natriuretic peptides and either current hospitalization for heart failure or history of hospitalization/emergency department visit for heart failure within a year were randomized to either placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil (pharmacokinetic-guided dosing: 25, 37.5, or 50 mg bid). A total of 8256 patients [male (79%), non-white (22%), mean age 65 years] were enrolled with a mean ejection fraction 27%, ischaemic aetiology in 54%, NYHA class II 53% and III/IV 47%, and median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide 1971 pg/mL. Heart failure therapies at baseline were among the most effectively employed in contemporary heart failure trials. GALACTIC-HF randomized patients representative of recent heart failure registries and trials with substantial numbers of patients also having characteristics understudied in previous trials including more from North America (n = 1386), enrolled as inpatients (n = 2084), systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (n = 1127), estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 528), and treated with sacubitril/valsartan at baseline (n = 1594). CONCLUSIONS: GALACTIC-HF enrolled a well-treated, high-risk population from both inpatient and outpatient settings, which will provide a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy, as well as informing its potential future implementation.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Female , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stroke Volume/drug effects , Urea/therapeutic use , Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects
17.
Clin Cardiol ; 43(11): 1301-1307, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32770579

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 has been associated with long-term cardiovascular mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease and to the development of new atrial fibrillation in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors but no evidence of cardiac disease. HYPOTHESIS: Preoperative soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 predicts the risk of future all-cause death and cardiovascular death among patients submitted to elective coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: From a cohort of 312 patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass surgery prospectively followed for a median of 6.7 years, we evaluated the prognostic role of preoperative soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, inflammatory markers, CHA2DS2-VASc score and development of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to establish an association of these parameters with long term all-cause death and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: During 2112 person-years of follow-up, we observed 41 deaths, 10 were cardiovascular deaths. Independently increased levels of preoperative soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, POAF, and CHA2DS2-VASc score were associated with all-cause mortality. After multivariate adjustment, elevated preoperative soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and POAF were the only independent predictors of all-cause death. Also, preoperative soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, POAF, and CHA2DS2-VASc score resulted in being independent predictors of cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Increased circulating levels of preoperative soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, together with POAF and CHA2DS2-VASc score, were significantly associated with future all-cause death and cardiovascular death among patients submitted to coronary artery bypass surgery.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Risk Assessment/methods , Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Chile/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/blood , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Period , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors
18.
Clin Cardiol ; 43(10): 1167-1174, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32692414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a powerful predictor of mortality. This study evaluated the predictive value of CRF for mortality in Chilean subjects without atherosclerotic disease compared with the Framingham, European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), and 2013 ACC/AHA risk scores and determined the incremental predictive value of CRF when added to these scores. HYPOTHESIS: CRF improves prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality of the standard international risk scores. METHODS: Cross-sectional study, which evaluated 4064 subjects between 2002 and 2016. Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, anthropometric and biochemical parameters, and blood pressure were measured. CRF was determined by metabolic equivalents during maximum stress test. The Framingham, SCORE, and ACC/AHA risk scores were calculated for all subjects. After a median follow-up of 9 years, all-cause and CVD-related mortality were assessed. Receiver operating curves were built to determine mortality prediction for CRF, the risk scores, and CRF added to the scores. RESULTS: As of August 2016, 99 deaths were reported, 33 of which were CVD-related. All risk scores and CRF predicted CVD-related mortality, with CRF identified as the best predictor: CRF: C = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93) vs Framingham: C = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60-0.76), SCORE: C = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.83), and ACC/AHA: C = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.85). Predictive power of the three scores improved when CRF was added to the model, but this was only significant for the Framingham score. CONCLUSIONS: CRF is a good predictor of both, all-cause and CV mortality and a better predictor of CVD-related deaths than standard risk scores in this population.


Subject(s)
Cardiorespiratory Fitness/physiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Risk Assessment/methods , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Cause of Death/trends , Chile/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Reference Standards , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends
19.
Eur Heart J ; 41(10): 1132-1140, 2020 03 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31995195

ABSTRACT

AIMS: As health systems around the world increasingly look to measure and improve the value of care that they provide to patients, being able to measure the outcomes that matter most to patients is vital. To support the shift towards value-based health care in atrial fibrillation (AF), the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled an international Working Group (WG) of 30 volunteers, including health professionals and patient representatives to develop a standardized minimum set of outcomes for benchmarking care delivery in clinical settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using an online-modified Delphi process, outcomes important to patients and health professionals were selected and categorized into (i) long-term consequences of disease outcomes, (ii) complications of treatment outcomes, and (iii) patient-reported outcomes. The WG identified demographic and clinical variables for use as case-mix risk adjusters. These included baseline demographics, comorbidities, cognitive function, date of diagnosis, disease duration, medications prescribed and AF procedures, as well as smoking, body mass index (BMI), alcohol intake, and physical activity. Where appropriate, and for ease of implementation, standardization of outcomes and case-mix variables was achieved using ICD codes. The standard set underwent an open review process in which over 80% of patients surveyed agreed with the outcomes captured by the standard set. CONCLUSION: Implementation of these consensus recommendations could help institutions to monitor, compare and improve the quality and delivery of chronic AF care. Their consistent definition and collection, using ICD codes where applicable, could also broaden the implementation of more patient-centric clinical outcomes research in AF.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Consensus , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
Eur Heart J ; 41(17): 1625-1632, 2020 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31811715

ABSTRACT

AIMS: PEGASUS-TIMI 54 demonstrated that long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), with an acceptable increase in bleeding, in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI). While much of the discussion around prolonged DAPT has been focused on stented patients, patients with prior MI without prior coronary stenting comprise a clinically important subgroup. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a pre-specified analysis from PEGASUS-TIMI 54, which randomized 21 162 patients with prior MI (1-3 years) and additional high-risk features to ticagrelor 60 mg, 90 mg, or placebo twice daily in addition to aspirin. A total of 4199 patients had no history of coronary stenting at baseline. The primary efficacy outcome (MACE) was the composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke. Patients without history of coronary stenting had higher baseline risk of MACE [13.2% vs. 8.0%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.73, in the placebo arm]. The relative risk reduction in MACE with ticagrelor (pooled doses) was similar in patients without (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99) and with prior stenting (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.96; P for interaction = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Long-term ticagrelor reduces thrombotic events in patients with prior MI regardless of whether they had prior coronary stenting. These data highlight the benefits of DAPT in prevention of spontaneous atherothrombotic events and indicate that long-term ticagrelor may be considered in high-risk patients with prior MI even if they have not been treated with stenting. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01225562.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists , Adenosine/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention , Ticagrelor/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...