Differences between national and international guidelines for the management of diabetic foot disease.

AIM: No studies have investigated if national guidelines to manage diabetic foot disease differ from international guidelines. This study aimed to compare guidelines of Western Pacific nations with the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) guidance documents. METHODS: The 77 recommendations in five chapters of the 2015 IWGDF guidance documents were used as the international gold standard reference. The IWGDF national representative(s) from 12 Western Pacific nations were invited to submit their nation's diabetic foot guideline(s). Four investigators rated information in the national guidelines as "similar," "partially similar," "not similar," or "different" when compared with IWGDF recommendations. National representative(s) reviewed findings. Disagreements in ratings were discussed until consensus agreement achieved. RESULTS: Eight of 12 nations (67%) responded: Australia, China, New Zealand, Taiwan, and Thailand provided national guidelines; Singapore provided the Association of Southeast Asian Nations guidelines; and Hong Kong and the Philippines advised no formal national diabetic foot guidelines existed. The six national guidelines included were 39% similar/partially similar, 58% not similar, and 2% different compared with the IWGDF recommendations. Within individual IWGDF chapters, the six national guidelines were similar/partially similar with 53% of recommendations for the IWGDF prevention chapter, 42% for wound healing, 40% for infection, 40% for peripheral artery disease, and 20% for offloading. CONCLUSIONS: National diabetic foot disease guidelines from a large and diverse region of the world showed limited similarity to recommendations made by international guidelines. Differences between recommendations may contribute to differences in national diabetic foot disease outcomes and burdens.

US assessment of medial arterial calcification: a sensitive marker of diabetes-related microvascular and macrovascular complications.

PURPOSE: To examine the sensitivity of ultrasonography (US) compared with conventional radiography in detection of lower limb (thigh) medial arterial calcification (MAC) in type 2 diabetic patients and evaluate its association with diabetes-related complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the local research ethics committee, and informed written consent was obtained. US was performed in 289 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and MAC severity was assigned a score from 0 to 8. Among the patients, 263 underwent radiographic examinations. All subjects underwent clinical evaluation to detect the presence of diabetes-related complications. RESULTS: US helped detect MAC in more subjects compared with radiography (65.8% vs 12.2%). US helped detect MAC from mild (scores 1-4) to severe (scores 5-8) degrees, while mild degree of MAC was poorly demonstrated with radiography. The incidence of nephropathy, retinopathy, sensory neuropathy, and macrovascular complications increased with the severity of MAC (based on US scoring). With univariate analysis, the presence of MAC was associated with nephropathy (P<.001), retinopathy (P<.001), sensory neuropathy (P=.004), and macrovascular complications (P<.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, the presence of severe MAC was associated with nephropathy, retinopathy, and macrovascular complications, with the odds ratios of 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53, 7.43; P=.003), 2.6 (95% CI: 1.22, 5.32; P=.013), and 3.8 (95% CI: 1.37, 10.6; P=.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: In type 2 diabetic Chinese patients, US was more sensitive than conventional radiography in the detection of MAC, particularly when the MAC was mild. The presence of severe MAC was associated with diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, and macrovascular complications. US detection of MAC was a potential early marker to identify diabetes-related complications.

The acceptability of telemedicine for podiatric intervention in a residential home for the elderly.

We investigated the use of telemedicine in the diagnosis and treatment of foot disorders. In an eight-month study, 49 residents of a local 200-bed home for the elderly, who had a potential or active foot problem, were examined via videoconferencing. They were subsequently examined on site. Their mean age was 86 years (range 67-100 years). There were 49 consultations for new cases and 50 follow-up consultations; therefore 99 teleconsultations and 99 on-site consultations were carried out. After 15% of the teleconsultations, an on-site visit was still required for full assessment of the case, as a diagnosis could not be determined. In 6% of teleconsultations there was difficulty in determining an accurate management plan. Telepodiatry was found to be satisfactory in the remaining 79% of cases and 87% of clients preferred teleconsultation to being transported to the hospital clinic. Telemedicine was found to be an acceptable method of providing some aspects of podiatry care to clients living in a residential home for the elderly. It was an excellent triage mechanism, and facilitated earlier identification of and intervention for urgent problems.