Trends of Medicare Reimbursement Rates for Gender-Affirming Surgery Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Awareness of Medicare reimbursement is important for gender-affirming surgeons who treat transgender patients with Medicare. In 2014, Medicare began to provide coverage for medically necessary transition-related surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for gender-affirming surgery procedures from 2014 to 2022. METHODS: The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was used, and the Current Procedural Terminology codes for 43 gender-affirming surgery services were obtained. Monetary units, conversion factors, relative value units (RVUs) for work, facility, and malpractice costs for 30 transmasculine and 13 transfeminine procedures were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were performed to account for inflation and to determine the relative differences between 2014 and 2022. RESULTS: For all gender-affirming surgery procedures covered by Medicare, the average relative difference of monetary units decreased by 2.99% between 2014 and 2022. On average, there was a 3.97% decrease of work-based RVU charges for transmasculine procedures and a 1.73% decrease of work-based RVU charges for transfeminine procedures. After adjusting for inflation, the average relative difference of monetary units for all gender-affirming surgery procedures decreased by 23.42% between 2014 and 2022. CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursement rates for gender-affirming surgery procedures covered under Medicare have decreased over the observed period, and trends in reimbursement rates have not kept up with consumer price index inflation. Gender-affirming surgeons should be conscious of these changes in reimbursement rates and advocate for fairer compensation to promote medical care among an underserved population.

A Differential Analysis of Preferred Feminine Facial Contours for Transfeminine Individuals.

BACKGROUND: Facial feminization surgeries are important gender-affirming procedures for transfeminine individuals. The literature provides guidance on classically feminine facial features but the aesthetic preferences of transgender patients have not been studied. This study aimed to define the preferred feminine facial proportions of transfeminine patients and compare them to a mixed population of US adults. METHODS: An online survey was designed consisting of virtually modified images with progressive degrees of change in 6 facial features: forehead, nasal dorsum, chin projection, nasolabial angle, mandibular angle, and chin height. It was administered to transfeminine patients in a large-scale health system as well as the general population using an online market research instrument. Respondents ranked each image on a 7-point Likert scale from "very unattractive" to "very attractive" for a feminine face. RESULTS: Both groups agreed that a moderately convex forehead without supraorbital ridge prominence, slightly sloped nasal dorsum, ∼105-degree nasolabial angle, and decreased chin height were considered most attractive. In addition, very concave nasal slope and ∼110-degree nasolabial angle were rated significantly higher by transfeminine respondents compared with controls. The most classically masculine versions of each feature were considered significantly more unattractive by transfeminine patients when compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Transfeminine individuals share significant preferences in feminine facial features with control respondents. However, transfeminine patients were more averse to traditionally masculine features on a feminine face and more accepting of the most traditionally feminine versions of nasal contours. Understanding these differences can facilitate surgical planning between surgeons and patients and potentially improve patient satisfaction.

Defining Preferred Esthetics of the Ideal Phallus via Crowdsource Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To describe phalloplasty subunits and determine the preferred crowdsourced esthetics. Esthetic ideals are often used to guide reconstruction, and there has been an increase in the number of gender-affirming surgeries and reconstructive phalloplasties performed. However, there is a paucity of literature describing ideal phalloplasty esthetics. METHODS: Phallus esthetic subunits were defined, and a split testing-based survey was used. Subjects were solicited via Craigslist, Amazon Mechanical Turk, and Reddit and distributed among health care co-workers. Computer-generated images with variable ratios of glans, corona, and shaft were provided and respondents were asked to select the most esthetically pleasing photo. Demographic information was gathered. Univariate and multivariate regression were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1029 people responded to the survey request and 909 people (88.3%) completed the entire survey. There were 440 respondents who self-identified as male, 334 female, 92 transgender male, and 25 transgender female. The health care field was the profession for 55.4%. Health care providers had 65.3% higher odds of preferring the longer shaft length-to-width ratio, 30.3% less odds of preferring a bilateral taper of the glans, and 48.4% less odds of preferring an angulated shaft compared to non-health care providers (P = .006, P = .021, P <.001, respectively). When compared to males, transgender females were more than 13 times likely to prefer an angulated glans corona junction (P = .008). CONCLUSION: The ideal phallic esthetic varies by individual, and there were statistically significant preferences across age, education, health care status, gender, and sexual orientation. This study can serve as a guide on phalloplasties for patients and gender-affirming surgeons.

Comparison of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Limb Salvage Reconstructive Surgery Based on Estimated Prevalence of Preexisting Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage after lower extremity (LE) trauma requires optimal blood flow for successful microsurgical reconstruction. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) decreases LE perfusion, affecting wound healing. Patients who present with LE trauma may have undiagnosed PAD, particularly those with atherosclerotic risk factors. This study assesses outcomes after LE salvage in patients at risk for PAD. METHODS: This retrospective review evaluated patients who underwent LE reconstruction at a level 1 trauma center between 2007 and 2022. Patients with a nontraumatic mechanism of injury, missing postoperative records, and unspecified race were excluded. Demographics, flap characteristics, and postoperative complications were abstracted. The prevalence of LE PAD was calculated using a validated risk assessment tool. RESULTS: At our institution, 285 LE flaps performed on 254 patients were included in the study. Patients were categorized by prevalence of PAD, including 12 (4.7%) with high risk, 45 (17.7%) with intermediate risk, and 197 (77.6%) patients with low risk. The high-risk cohort had higher rates of partial flap necrosis ( P = 0.037), flap loss ( P = 0.006), and amputation ( P < 0.001) compared with the low-risk group. Fewer high-risk patients achieved full ambulation compared with the low-risk ( P = 0.005) cohort. Overall flap survival and limb salvage rates were 94.5% and 96.5%, respectively. Among the intermediate- and high-risk cohorts, only 50.9% of patients received a preoperative vascular assessment, and 3.8% received a vascular surgery consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral arterial disease represents a reconstructive challenge to microvascular surgeons. Patients with high-risk for PAD had higher rates of partial flap necrosis, flap loss, and amputation. In the setting of trauma, emphasis should be placed on preoperative vascular assessment for patients at risk of having undiagnosed PAD. Prospective studies collecting ankle-brachial index assessments and/or angiography will help validate this study's findings.

Comparative Evaluation of the Electronic Residency Application Service Versus the Plastic Surgery Common Application to a Single Institution in the 2022 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.

BACKGROUND: The Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA) has emerged as a low-cost alternative application portal to the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) for integrated plastic surgery applicants. During the 2021 to 2022 application cycle, our plastic surgery residency program accepted both the PSCA and ERAS applications to help recruit candidates otherwise deterred by prohibitively high application costs. We sought to determine how the PSCA compared with the ERAS application in a standardized review of applications scores. METHODS: The PSCA and ERAS applications from 28 candidates who received interviews from the Keck School of Medicine were analyzed. These 56 applications were randomly assigned across 22 independent reviewers. Each reviewer scored applications on a scale of 1 to 5 with regard to communication skills, leadership, intellectual curiosity, compatibility with the program, service, and perseverance. Mean scores between the applications were compared using 2-tailed z tests, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The 56 residency applications had a combined mean score of 4.21 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.13-4.29). The mean score of PSCA applications (4.19; 95% CI, 4.08-4.31) did not significantly differ from the mean score of ERAS applications (4.24; 95% CI, 4.12-4.35; P = 0.57). The PSCA and ERAS applications did not have a significant difference in the mean scores for any review category. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the overall scores and the scores of each review category between the PSCA and ERAS applications, suggesting that the PSCA may be a reasonable alternative to ERAS for medical students applying to plastic surgery residency.

The Top 100 Cited Articles in the Microsurgical Treatment for Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine uses the current best evidence for decisions about patient care. Lymphedema is a chronic debilitating medical condition caused by a dysfunctional lymphatic system. This study analyzes the most cited articles, including the levels of evidence, for the surgical treatment of lymphedema. METHODS: The Web of Science Sci-Expanded Index was utilized to search for surgical treatment of lymphedema. Articles were examined by three independent reviewers and the top 100 articles were determined. The corresponding author, citation count, publication year, topic, study design, level of evidence, journal, country, and institution were analyzed. RESULTS: Since 1970, the top 100 articles have been cited 7,300 times. The average citation count was 68 and standard deviation was 55. The majority was case series (71), followed by retrospective cohort (8), prospective cohort (7), retrospective case-control (5), and randomized controlled trials (2). Based on the "Level of Evidence Pyramid," 71 articles were level IV, 13 articles were level III, and 9 articles were level II. On the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Scale, there were 71 articles with "very low," 20 articles with "low," and 2 articles with "moderate" quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: The top 100 cited articles were mostly case series and lacked high levels of evidence. Most studies are retrospective case series with short-term outcomes. However, low level evidence for new surgical procedures is to be expected. Current trends suggest the treatment and understanding of lymphedema will continue to improve.