The evolving role of biologics in the treatment of pediatric psoriasis.

The exact role of biologics in the treatment of pediatric psoriasis remains undefined but is evolving. Biologics are an attractive option for use in children in part because they offer more convenient dosing regimens and less frequent laboratory monitoring than traditional systemic agents. Further, because their action is targeted, they theoretically lack many of the potential end-organ toxicities of traditional agents. However, compared to adult psoriasis populations, there is a relative lack of long-term safety data specific to the pediatric psoriasis population. Thus, the clear advantages of using biologic agents must be balanced with a measure of caution. This article will provide a summary of the cumulative pediatric safety and efficacy data for the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 (IL12/23) pathway inhibitor and suggestions for a rational clinical approach to their use in children with psoriasis.

Systemic and light therapies for the management of childhood psoriasis: part II.

The choice of treatment for psoriasis in children, as in adults, is determined by disease acuity, morphology, distribution, severity, and the presence of comorbidities, such as psoriatic arthropathy. Fortunately, most patients present with mild disease that responds adequately to topical medications. A minor subset of children will present with severe, rapidly evolving disease that requires more aggressive interventions. Advanced medical treatment with systemic and phototherapy is challenging and primarily anecdotal, as these modalities are neither well-studied nor approved for use in children. Part II of this 2-part series features an overview of systemic and light therapies including their varying degrees of effectiveness, potential side-effects and applications in clinical practice.

Topical therapy for the management of childhood psoriasis: part I.

Psoriasis represents a potentially life-altering disease that can profoundly impact physical, emotional and social functioning, and overall quality of life. The majority of cases are mild and managed adequately with topical medications. A minor subset of children present with severe, rapidly evolving disease that requires systemic therapy. The choice of treatment in children, as in adults, is determined by disease acuity, morphology, distribution, severity and the presence of comorbidities such as psoriatic arthropathy. Practical considerations such as ease of use, patient acceptability, accessibility, risk to benefit ratio, cost and individual perceptions of disease and quality of life are factored into treatment decisions. Part I of this 2-part series will focus on topical agents, their varying degrees of effectiveness, potential side-effects and applications in clinical practice.

TNF-alpha inhibitors in dermatology.

To date, the US FDA has approved three tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a inhibitors for use in dermatology. Etanercept (Enbrel, Amgen-Wyeth), a fully human fusion protein of TNF receptor II bound to the Fc component of human IgG1, is approved for use in psoriasis (2004) and psoriatic arthritis (2002). Infliximab (Remicade, Centocor) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that is approved for use in psoriasis (2006) and psoriatic arthritis (2005), and adalimumab (Humira, Abbott Laboratories), a fully human monoclonal antibody, is approved for use in psoriatic arthritis (2005). While data regarding the efficacy and safety of these therapies is abundant, it proves nearly impossible to objectively compare and contrast agents as there are no head-to-head trials. Clinical experience and post-marketing reporting has allowed dermatologists to identify the relative strengths and limitations of each agent. The well-founded enthusiasm for these agents, because of their excellent initial efficacy and safety profile, is reasonably tempered by concerns about declining efficacy over time, the risk of infection, lymphoma and demyelinating disorders, and cost. The distinct and targeted mechanism of action of the TNF inhibitors allows dermatologists to customize therapy to match the individual needs and characteristics of patients who are candidates for systemic or phototherapy.

Urinary histamine metabolite elevations during experimental influenza infection.

BACKGROUND: Although histamine is hypothesized to mediate symptoms induced by viral upper respiratory infections, elevations of this mediator have not been observed in nasal lavage fluids recovered from patients with viral upper respiratory infections. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use a novel method to determine whether histamine is released during experimental influenza A infection. METHODS: Healthy adults (n = 15) were cloistered and inoculated intranasally with influenza A virus, and monitored for infection and illness. Daily morning void urines were collected and assayed for histamine and its metabolites by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Total histamine was calculated for each urine specimen by summing the assayed values of histamine and its metabolites. RESULTS: All subjects were infected and developed illness. ANOVA documented a significant effect of study day (viral infection) on urinary levels of total histamine (P < 0.02). Pairwise analysis showed a significant elevation 2 days after inoculation. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide the first direct evidence that histamine is released in vivo during infection with a virus that causes cold/flu symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy with short ragweed extract.

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy, if proven safe and effective, could be an alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study investigated the clinic and immunologic effects of ragweed immunotherapy using a new microencapsulated, pH-sensitive, oral delivery system. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 23 patients with allergic rhinitis to short ragweed. Following a baseline nasal challenge with ragweed allergen, oral immunotherapy with encapsulated short ragweed extract or placebo was administered once daily, 6 days/week. Dosed began at 3 micrograms Amb a 1 per day and were increased by 3 micrograms every three days as tolerated, to a maximum daily maintenance dose of 24 micrograms. A nasal challenge was repeated 6 weeks, later, followed by the continuation of maintenance therapy through the natural ragweed season. Daily allergy symptoms and relief medication usage was recorded. A final nasal challenge was performed at the end of the natural season. Short ragweed-specific serum IgE, IgG, and IgG4 antibody levels were measured every 2 weeks during the study. RESULTS: Maximum tolerated doses ranged from 6 to 24 micrograms Amb a 1 per day (74% reached 24 micrograms). Adverse events were not serious or different between the active and placebo groups. The active group showed increased in short ragweed-specific serum IgG and IgG4 antibody levels. Symptom scores during the natural season were numerically but not statistically lower in the active treatment group. This group also experienced a greater reduction from baseline in nasal reactivity as assessed by nasal challenge. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest that the encapsulated, pH-sensitive oral immunotherapy delivery system was safe, induced a brisk serologic response, and attenuated the symptomatic response to both experimental and environmental ragweed exposure.