ABSTRACT
AIM: Morbidity of open inguinal lymphadenectomy (OIL) is high. We use laparoscopy for pelvic time, preservation of the greater saphenous vein and transverse inguinal incisions (laparoscopically assisted ilio-inguinal lymphadenectomy, LIIL) to improve postoperative outcomes. PATIENTS & METHODS: Retrospective comparison of 14 patients who underwent LIIL and seven patients who underwent OIL. RESULTS: Fourteen LIIL compared with seven OIL showed a statistically significant reduction in morbidity (15.3 vs 75%) and hospital stay (7 vs 15.7 days). Pelvic lymph node involvement (27%) was not detected preoperatively. With a mean follow-up of 36.2 (range: 3-137) months, local recurrence rate was 58.3% in LIIL and 40% in OIL. Overall survival was significantly higher in OIL than in LIIL. CONCLUSION: Compared with OIL, LIIL reduced postoperative complications and hospital stay.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Besides more common sites such as lung or peritoneum, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can metastatize to rare sites. We report herein a new metastatic site of HCC: the nail-bed. We also review other recently reported rare site HCC metastases (RSHM). CASE REPORT: A 66-year-old woman with a 12-year history of resected-stage IA HCC who later presented lung, spleen and brain metastases treated with surgery, systemic therapies (sorafenib, sunitinib, capecitabine) and radiotherapy. The patient was referred to us because of a painful and rapidly evolving mass in the nail-bed of the left thumb. Biopsy confirmed nail-bed HCC metastasis, and the finger was amputated. The patient died few weeks later. CONCLUSION: This case was an opportunity for us to review RSHM. This type of metastasis seems to be an early event, in the context of advanced stage HCC with elevated protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA II). The Lee nomogram is useful in detecting patients at high risk of developing RSHM. We would suggest insisting on systemic treatment in these metastatic patients although overall survival after RSHM diagnosis is poor.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The implantation of Gatekeeper ™ (GK) represents a new option for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI). The aim of this study was to analyze the postoperative morbidity associated with GK and to determine its clinical efficacy after at least 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective and longitudinal study of patients with FI who were treated with GK at our institutions between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients with FI without sphincter lesions or with sphincter injuries < 120° and with low anterior resection syndrome were included. Postoperative complications, long-term adverse effects and migration were recorded. FI severity was assessed using the Vaizey score. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders according to the improvement of the Vaizey score (≥ than 50 and < 50%, respectively) during the first 6 months after implantation. RESULTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients treated with GK between 2010 and 2015 were included (11 males and 38 females, mean age 63.3 years, SD 13.5). No postoperative and long-term complications were observed. Prosthesis migration was observed in 51% of patients. Twenty-three patients (48%) were classified as responders and 25 (52%) as non-responders. The mean Vaizey score at baseline, 6, 12 months and last visit post-surgery in the responder group was, respectively, 13.3 (SD 3.8), 4.3 (SD 2.1), 4.2 (SD 3.6) and 5.7 (SD 5.3). Significant differences were observed between the mean baseline Vaizey score and the mean 6, 12 and last follow-up Vaizey score values (p < 0.001). In long-term follow-up (2.7 years (SD 1.1)), responders maintained an improvement of more than 50% of the baseline Vaizey score. In the non-responder group the mean number of migrated prostheses was higher than in the responder group (2.4 SD 2.5 vs. 1.0 SD 1.6; p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: GK is a safe and effective procedure in more than 50% of the patients for at least 1 year after the implantation.
