Subject(s)
Amikacin , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Negative Results , Respiration, ArtificialABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Treatment of ventilated pneumonia is often unsuccessful, even when patients are treated according to established guidelines. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combination drug device Amikacin Inhale as an adjunctive therapy to intravenous standard-of-care antibiotics for pneumonia caused by Gram-negative pathogens in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: INHALE was a prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study comprising two trials (INHALE 1 and INHALE 2) done in 153 hospital intensive-care units in 25 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older; had pneumonia that had been diagnosed by chest radiography and that was documented as being caused by or showing two risk factors for a Gram-negative, multidrug-resistant pathogen; were intubated and mechanically ventilated; had impaired oxygenation within 48 h before screening; and had a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score of at least 6. Patients were stratified by region and disease severity (according to their Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score) and randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice-recognition system to receive 400 mg amikacin (Amikacin Inhale) or saline placebo, both of which were aerosolised, administered every 12 h for 10 days via the same synchronised inhalation system, and given alongside standard-of-care intravenous antibiotics. All patients and all staff involved in administering devices and monitoring outcomes were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint, survival at days 28-32, was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, were infected with a Gram-negative pathogen, and had an APACHE II score of at least 10 at diagnosis. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01799993 and NCT00805168. FINDINGS: Between April 13, 2013, and April 7, 2017, 807 patients were assessed for eligibility and 725 were randomly assigned to Amikacin Inhale (362 patients) or aerosolised placebo (363 patients). 712 patients received at least one dose of study drug (354 in the Amikacin Inhale group and 358 in the placebo group), although one patient assigned to Amikacin Inhale received placebo in error and was included in the placebo group for safety analyses. 508 patients (255 in the Amikacin Inhale group and 253 in the placebo group) were assessed for the primary endpoint. We found no between-group difference in survival: 191 (75%) patients in the Amikacin Inhale group versus 196 (77%) patients in the placebo group survived until days 28-32 (odds ratio 0·841, 95% CI 0·554-1·277; p=0·43). Similar proportions of patients in the two treatment groups had a treatment-emergent adverse event (295 [84%] of 353 patients in the Amikacin Inhale group vs 303 [84%] of 359 patients in the placebo group) or a serious treatment-emergent adverse event (101 [29%] patients vs 97 [27%] patients). INTERPRETATION: Our findings do not support use of inhaled amikacin adjunctive to standard-of-care intravenous therapy in mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia. FUNDING: Bayer AG.
Subject(s)
Administration, Inhalation , Amikacin/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Standard of Care , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To conduct a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II study of BAY41-6551 (NCT01004445), an investigational drug-device combination of amikacin, formulated for inhalation, and a proprietary Pulmonary Drug Delivery System, for the treatment of Gram-negative pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Sixty-nine mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia, a clinical pulmonary infection score ≥6, at risk for multidrug-resistant organisms, were randomized to BAY41-6551 400 mg every 12 h (q12h), 400 mg every 24 h (q24h) with aerosol placebo, or placebo q12h for 7-14 days, plus standard intravenous antibiotics. The combined primary endpoint was a tracheal aspirate amikacin maximum concentration ≥6,400 µg/mL (25 × 256 µg/mL reference minimum inhibitory concentration) and a ratio of area under the aspirate concentration-time curve (0-24 h) to minimum inhibitory concentration ≥100 on day 1. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was achieved in 50% (6/12) and 16.7% (3/18) of patients in the q12h and q24h groups, respectively. Clinical cure rates, in the 48 patients getting ≥7 days of therapy, were 93.8% (15/16), 75.0% (12/16), and 87.5% (14/16) in the q12h, q24h, and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.467). By the end of aerosol therapy, the mean number of antibiotics per patient per day was 0.9 in the q12h, 1.3 in the q24h, and 1.9 in the placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.02 for difference between groups). BAY41-6551 was well tolerated and attributed to two adverse events in one patient (mild bronchospasm). CONCLUSIONS: BAY41-6551 400 mg q12h warrants further clinical evaluation.
Subject(s)
Amikacin/administration & dosage , Amikacin/analysis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Body Fluids/chemistry , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Aerosols , Amikacin/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , TracheaABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Abstract Background: BAY41-6551, a drug-device combination in development for adjunctive treatment of Gram-negative pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, consists of amikacin formulated for inhalation coupled with the Pulmonary Drug Delivery System (PDDS) Clinical aerosol delivery platform. This study evaluated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BAY41-6551 in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: Single doses of BAY41-6551 (400 mg amikacin) were administered using the PDDS Clinical handheld device to six subjects with mild-to-moderate (Group 1) and six subjects with severe renal impairment (Group 2). Seven subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD; Group 3) received single doses of BAY41-6551 on days 1 and 9, with hemodialysis (HD) scheduled 24 h postdose on day 1 and 3 h postdose on day 9. PK analysis was performed on serum, urine, and dialysate samples (Group 3). RESULTS: Individual serum amikacin concentrations in Groups 1 and 2 were below 6 mg/L at all times [mean maximum serum drug concentration (C(max)) 0.94 mg/L and 2.46 mg/L, respectively). In Group 3, serum amikacin concentrations decreased after each HD session, and amikacin area under the serum concentration-time curve from zero to 72 h (AUC(72)) and C(max) values were lower on day 9 than on day 1 (mean AUC(72) 71.5 mg · h/L vs. 151.5 mg · h/L; mean C(max) 2.09 mg/L vs. 6.16 mg/L). The amounts of amikacin removed by HD and the dialysate clearance rates were similar on days 1 and 9. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of BAY41-6551 were well tolerated in subjects with CKD. HD effectively removed amikacin from serum in subjects with ESRD, and the timing relative to BAY41-6551 administration was an important determinant of systemic amikacin exposure. Nevertheless, standard precautionary measures for intravenous amikacin should apply for patients receiving BAY41-6551, and dose adjustments and/or dialysis should be considered for subjects with severe renal impairment.
Subject(s)
Amikacin/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems , Kidney Diseases/complications , Adult , Aerosols , Aged , Amikacin/adverse effects , Amikacin/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Kidney Diseases/physiopathology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Dialysis/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: BAY41-6551, a drug-device combination in development for adjunctive treatment of Gram-negative pneumonia in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients, consists of amikacin formulated for inhalation coupled with the Pulmonary Drug Delivery System (PDDS) Clinical aerosol delivery platform. Given the predominantly renal clearance of aminoglycosides, understanding systemic amikacin exposure and safety during administration of BAY41-6551 to patients with acute renal failure (ARF) is clinically important. METHODS: Seven mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia and ARF receiving continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) were treated with multiple administrations of BAY41-6551 400 mg amikacin twice daily using the PDDS Clinical on-ventilator device [in addition to standard intravenous (i.v.) antimicrobial therapy]. CVVHDF parameters were recorded and a PK analysis was performed using serum, urine, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. RESULTS: Maximum serum amikacin concentration [median 1.93 (range: 0.63-3.99) mg/L] and area under the concentration-time curve from zero to 12 h on day 3 [median 19.32 (range 6.32-36.87) mg · h/L] were elevated compared with mechanically ventilated patients with normal renal function; however, serum amikacin trough concentrations were within accepted safety limits. The median amikacin concentration in epithelial lining fluid [887 (range: 406-12,819) mg/L] was similar to that reported previously in mechanically ventilated patients with normal renal function. BAY41-6551 demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability with most adverse events (AEs) as expected for the patient population. One serious AE of bronchospasm was attributed to the study medication; no reported AEs were related to the PDDS Clinical device. CONCLUSIONS: CVVHDF appears to provide adequate clearance of systemically absorbed amikacin in mechanically ventilated patients with ARF, suggesting that dose adjustments for BAY41-6551 are probably not necessary for this patient population. Nonetheless, the standard precautionary measures for critically ill patients receiving i.v. amikacin should be followed for patients with ARF who are treated with BAY41-6551.
Subject(s)
Amikacin/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Acute Kidney Injury/complications , Aerosols , Aged , Amikacin/adverse effects , Amikacin/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Critical Illness , Drug Delivery Systems , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemodiafiltration/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Respiration, Artificial , Tissue DistributionABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Aminoglycosides aerosolization might achieve better diffusion into the alveolar compartment than intravenous use. The objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate aerosol-delivered amikacin penetration into the alveolar epithelial lining fluid (ELF) using a new vibrating mesh nebulizer (Pulmonary Drug Delivery System (PDDS), Nektar Therapeutics), which delivers high doses to the lungs. METHODS: Nebulized amikacin (400 mg bid) was delivered to the lungs of 28 mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative VAP for 7-14 days, adjunctive to intravenous therapy. On treatment day 3, 30 minutes after completing aerosol delivery, all the patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage in the infection-involved area and the ELF amikacin concentration was determined. The same day, urine and serum amikacin concentrations were determined at different time points. RESULTS: Median (range) ELF amikacin and maximum serum amikacin concentrations were 976.1 (135.7-16127.6) and 0.9 (0.62-1.73) microg/mL, respectively. The median total amount of amikacin excreted in urine during the first and second 12-hour collection on day 3 were 19 (12.21-28) and 21.2 (14.1-29.98) microg, respectively. During the study period, daily through amikacin measurements were below the level of nephrotoxicity. Sixty-four unexpected adverse events were reported, among which 2 were deemed possibly due to nebulized amikacin: one episode of worsening renal failure, and one episode of bronchospasm. CONCLUSIONS: PDDS delivery of aerosolized amikacin achieved very high aminoglycoside concentrations in ELF from radiography-controlled infection-involved zones, while maintaining safe serum amikacin concentrations. The ELF concentrations always exceeded the amikacin minimum inhibitory concentrations for Gram-negative microorganisms usually responsible for these pneumonias. The clinical impact of amikacin delivery with this system remains to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01021436.