Vigorous vs. moderate exercise to improve glucose metabolism in inactive women with polycystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance: a pilot randomized controlled trial of two home-based exercise routines.

Objective: To study the impact of vigorous vs. moderate exercise on metabolic parameters in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Unsupervised home-based exercise program. Patients: Patients with PCOS on the basis of the Rotterdam criteria with insulin resistance. Interventions: Participants were block randomized to a home-based exercise program of 75 minutes of vigorous exercise or 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week, for 8 weeks total. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance. Results: In total, 36 participants were randomized, of whom 20 completed the study. The percentage changes from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks for fasting glucose, insulin, and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance did not significantly differ between the groups, except for the change in the 8-week glucose level, which was more favorable in the moderate arm (8.06% [standard deviation, 6.44%] in the vigorous group compared with -0.32% [standard deviation, 4.91%] in the moderate group). The absolute values of the main outcomes (fasting glucose, insulin, and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance) at baseline and 4 and 8 weeks did not significantly differ between trial arms. When assessing the change from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks, overall and within each trial arm, only the 8-week fasting glucose level was significantly greater than the baseline value in the vigorous arm (93.5 [95% confidence interval, 88.7-98.3] vs. 86.8 [95% confidence interval, 81.1-92.4]). Conclusions: Unsupervised short-term exercise programs may not achieve significant metabolic improvements in patients with PCOS, regardless of vigorous vs. moderate intensity. Future studies should investigate this question in larger sample sizes and longer or structured exercise programs. Clinical Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02303470.

Metabolic and endocrine status associate with obstructive sleep apnea risk among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) appears to be increased among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but the underlying physiology is unclear. We sought to identify predictors of OSA risk among patients with PCOS. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of patients evaluated for PCOS at a single tertiary center from 2017-2022 was completed. Inclusion criteria included patients 18-44 years of age who had Rotterdam criteria for PCOS and had completed a Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) for OSA risk assessment. All patients underwent standardized anthropometric, ultrasound, endocrine, and metabolic phenotyping. RESULTS: Of the 572 patients screened during the study period, 309 patients with PCOS met inclusion criteria, and 104 (33.7%) had a high-risk BQ. Those with a high-risk BQ, compared with those without, had significantly (P < .05) higher waist:hip ratio, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting insulin, 2-hour insulin, fasting glucose, 2-hour glucose, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, hemoglobin A1C, C-reactive protein, free testosterone, and free androgen index and had lower high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and sex hormone binding globulin. In multivariable modeling controlling for all significantly differing variables in univariate analyses, hemoglobin A1C (ß [standard error] 1.05 [0.45], P = .02), C-reactive protein (0.09 [0.04], P = .01), and sex hormone binding globulin (-0.02 [0.01], P = .02) associated with high-risk BQ. CONCLUSIONS: Dysglycemia, inflammation, and androgen status independently associate with predicted OSA risk by BQ. Future studies are needed to comprehensively assess the impact of treatment of OSA on these outcomes among patients with PCOS to better clarify the directionality and clinical implications of these associations. CITATION: Christ JP, Shinkai K, Corley J, Pasch L, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. Metabolic and endocrine status associate with obstructive sleep apnea risk among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(6):871-877.

In Utero Exposure to Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination and Offspring Neurodevelopment at 12 and 18 Months.

Importance: Uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant individuals was hampered by safety concerns around potential risks to unborn children. Data clarifying early neurodevelopmental outcomes of offspring exposed to COVID-19 vaccination in utero are lacking. Objective: To determine whether in utero exposure to maternal COVID-19 vaccination was associated with differences in scores on the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, third edition (ASQ-3), at 12 and 18 months of age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study, Assessing the Safety of Pregnancy During the Coronavirus Pandemic (ASPIRE), enrolled pregnant participants from May 2020 to August 2021; follow-up of children from these pregnancies is ongoing. Participants, which included pregnant individuals and their offspring from all 50 states, self-enrolled online. Study activities were performed remotely. Exposure: In utero exposure of the fetus to maternal COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was compared with those unexposed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Neurodevelopmental scores on validated ASQ-3, completed by birth mothers at 12 and 18 months. A score below the established cutoff in any of 5 subdomains (communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, social skills) constituted an abnormal screen for developmental delay. Results: A total of 2487 pregnant individuals (mean [SD] age, 33.3 [4.2] years) enrolled at less than 10 weeks' gestation and completed research activities, yielding a total of 2261 and 1940 infants aged 12 and 18 months, respectively, with neurodevelopmental assessments. In crude analyses, 471 of 1541 exposed infants (30.6%) screened abnormally for developmental delay at 12 months vs 203 of 720 unexposed infants (28.2%; χ2 = 1.32; P = .25); the corresponding prevalences at 18 months were 262 of 1301 (20.1%) vs 148 of 639 (23.2%), respectively (χ2 = 2.35; P = .13). In multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusting for maternal age, race, ethnicity, education, income, maternal depression, and anxiety, no difference in risk for abnormal ASQ-3 screens was observed at either time point (12 months: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.14; 95% CI, 0.97-1.33; 18 months: aRR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72-1.07). Further adjustment for preterm birth and infant sex did not affect results (12 months: aRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.98-1.36; 18 months: aRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.07). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that COVID-19 vaccination was safe during pregnancy from the perspective of infant neurodevelopment to 18 months of age. Additional longer-term research should be conducted to corroborate these findings and buttress clinical guidance with a strong evidence base.

Decision regret among women considering planned oocyte cryopreservation: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To (1) prospectively characterize the incidence of decision regret among women considering planned oocyte cryopreservation (planned OC), comparing those who pursued treatment vs those who did not freeze eggs, and (2) to identify baseline predictors for future decision regret. METHODS: A total of 173 women seen in consultation for planned OC were followed prospectively. Surveys were administered at (1) baseline (< 1 week after initial consultation) and (2) follow-up, 6 months after planned OC among participants who froze eggs or 6 months following consultation in the absence of further communication to pursue treatment. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe decision regret, indicated by a Decision Regret Scale score > 25. We also examined predictors of regret. RESULTS: The incidence of moderate-to-severe regret over the decision to freeze eggs was 9% compared to 51% over the decision not to pursue treatment. Among women who froze eggs, adequacy of information at baseline to decide about treatment (aOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03, 0.87) and emphasis on future parenthood (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66, 0.99) were associated with reduced odds of regret. Forty-six percent of women who froze eggs regretted not doing so earlier. Among women who did not freeze eggs, the primary reasons were financial and time constraints, correlating with increased odds of decision regret in an exploratory analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Among women undergoing planned OC, the incidence of decision regret is low compared to the regret confronting women seen in consultation for planned OC but who do not pursue treatment. Provider counseling is key to offset the regret risk.

Racial and ethnic differences in self-reported satisfaction with fertility clinics and doctors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if differences in self-reported satisfaction with fertility clinics and doctors differ by race/ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN: We used cross-sectional survey data from FertilityIQ online questionnaires completed by patients receiving US. fertility care from July 2015 to December 2020. Univariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to assess association of race/ethnicity on patient-reported clinic and physician satisfaction. RESULTS: Our total sample size included 21,472 unique survey responses (15,986 Caucasian, 1856 Black, 1780 LatinX, 771 East Asian, 619 South Asian, 273 Middle Eastern, 187 Native American self-reported). When adjusting for potential confounders (demographic and patient satisfaction), we found that Black patients rated their doctors more highly (odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.62 p = 0.022 logistic and Coefficient 0.082, 95% CI 0.013-0.15 p = 0.02 linear), while other ethnic groups did not show significant differences compared to Caucasian patients. East Asians had borderline lower satisfaction with clinic satisfaction in logistic regression (OR 0.74 95% CI 0.55-1.00 p = 0.05), while significant differences were not found for other ethnic groups for clinic satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, some but not all minority groups differed in their self-reported perception of satisfaction with fertility clinic and doctors compared to Caucasian patients. Cultural differences towards surveys may contribute to some of these findings, and satisfaction by racial/ethnic group may also be modified by results of care.