Global health and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine: a cross-sectional survey of members and fellows.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in global health participation among emergency care doctors in the UK. The aim of this paper was to describe the demographics of members and fellows of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine involved in global health, the work they are involved in, as well as the benefits and barriers of this work. METHODS: We conducted a survey to include members and fellows of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine describing the context of their global health work, funding arrangements for global health work and perceived barriers to, and benefits of, global health work. RESULTS: The survey collected 1134 responses of which 439 (38.7%) were excluded. The analysis was performed with the remaining 695 (61.3%) responses. Global health involvement concentrated around South Asia and Africa. Work contexts were mainly direct clinical service (267, 38%), curriculum development (203, 29%) and teaching short courses (198, 28%). Activity was largely self-funded, both international (539, 78%) and from UK (516, 74%). Global health work was not reported to contribute to appraisal by many participants (294, 42.3%). Funding (443, 64%) and protected time (431, 62%) were reported as key barriers to global health productivity. DISCUSSION: Participants largely targeted specialty development and educational activities. Lack of training, funding and supported time were identified as barriers to development. Galvanising support for global health through regional networks and College support for attracting funding and job plan recognition will help UK-based emergency care clinicians contribute more productively to this field.

Infection control and treatment guidelines and neonatal mortality in a rural hospital in Uganda.

Background: The neonatal mortality rate in Uganda has been 24-27/1000 live births for the last 14 years. Aim: To determine the impact on neonatal mortality of the introduction of infection prevention and treatment guidelines in a resource-poor setting. Methods: A prospective study was undertaken in Kagando Hospital, a rural hospital in Western Uganda of infants live-born in hospital and those admitted from the community or other hospitals between 2013 and 2017. Guidelines were developed from a literature review and informed by local doctors and nurses and a visiting paediatrician. The guidelines highlighted that unwell infants should be admitted to the neonatal unit which was a section of the paediatric ward, emphasised hand hygiene, the separation of infants with and without sepsis and that unwell infants should be treated with evidence-based antibiotic regimens and enteral feeds withheld from unwell infants. Mortality within 28 days of birth was audited for 3 months before and after the intervention; the audit was repeated 3 and 5 years later. Results: Pre-intervention, there were 137 neonatal admissions and 79 neonatal deaths in 3 months (0.58 deaths per admission). Post-intervention there were 187 admissions and the death rate was lower (0.26 deaths per admission, p < 0.001). Three years after the intervention, there were 60 deaths among 233 admissions (0.26 deaths per admission, p < 0.001) and, at 5 years, 53 deaths among 315 admissions (0.17 deaths per admission, p < 0.001). Conclusion: These data suggest that the introduction of infection, prevention and treatment guidelines can reduce neonatal mortality in a resource-poor setting.