ABSTRACT
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common malignancy of the female gynaecological tract and increased exposure to estrogens is a risk factor. EC cells are able to produce estrogens locally using precursors like, among others, adrenal steroids present in the serum. This is referred to as local estrogen metabolism (or intracrinology) and consists of a complex network of multiple enzymes. Particular relevant to the final generation of active estrogens in endometrial cells are: steroid sulfatase (STS), estrogen sulfotransferase (SULT1E1), aromatase (CYP19A1), 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD17B) type 1 and type 2. During the last decades, a plethora of studies explored the level of these enzymes in EC but contrasting data were reported, which generated vigorous debate and controversies. Several reviews attempted at clarifying some of the debated issues, but published reviews are based on investigator-defined bibliography selection and not on systematic analysis. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of the literature reporting about the level of STS, SULT1E1, CYP19A1, HSD17B1 and HSD17B2 in EC. Additional intracrine enzymes and networks (e.g., HSD17Bs other than types 1 and 2, aldo-keto reductases, progesterone and androgen metabolism) were non-systematically reviewed as well.
Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/metabolism , Estrogens/metabolism , 17-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases/metabolism , Aromatase/metabolism , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Endometrial Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Signal Transduction , Steryl-Sulfatase/metabolismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Contradictory results are reported about the level of steroid sulfatase (STS), estrogen sulfotransferase (SULT1E1; together, the sulfatase pathway) and aromatase (CYP19A1) in endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of this study was to explore the levels of these enzymes in a well-characterized cohort of EC patients and postmenopausal controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endometrial tissues from 31 EC patients (21 grade 1 and 10 grade 2-3) and 19 postmenopausal controls were collected. Levels of mRNA (RT-qPCR) and protein (immunohistochemistry) were determined. STS enzyme activity was measured by HPLC, whereas SULT1E1 enzyme activity was determined using a novel method based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: No significant differences in STS, SULT1E1 mRNA or protein levels and STS:SULT1E1 ratio were found. STS enzyme activity and STS:SULT1E1 activity ratio were significantly decreased in ECs compared with controls. CYP19A1 mRNA levels were lower in ECs than in controls. CONCLUSION: A novel highly sensitive and accurate protocol to assess SULT1E1 activity is presented. STS enzyme activity and the STS:SULT1E1 activity ratio seem to be lower in ECs than in controls. STS is an important route for estrogen supply in endometrial cells.
