Non-obese lipedema patients show a distinctly altered quantitative sensory testing profile with high diagnostic potential.

Introduction and Objectives: Lipedema is a widespread severe chronic disease affecting mostly women. Characterized by painful bilateral fat accumulation in extremities sparing hands and feet, objective measurement-based diagnosis is currently missing. We tested for characteristic psychometric and/or sensory alterations including pain and for their potential for medical routine diagnosis. Methods: Pain psychometry was assessed using the German Pain Questionnaire. Sensory sensitivity toward painful and nonpainful stimuli was characterized in non-obese lipedema patients and matched controls using the validated quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain. Results: Lipedema patients showed no overt psychometric abnormalities. Pain was reported as somatic rather than psychosomatic aversive. All QST measurements were normal, but the z-score of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) was twofold reduced and the z-score of vibration detection thresholds (VDT) was two and a half times increased. Both thresholds were selectively altered at the affected thigh but not the unaffected hand. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the combination of PPT and VDT of thigh vs hand into a PVTH score (PPT, VDT, thigh, hand-score) shows high sensitivity and specificity, categorizing correctly 95.8% of the participants as lipedema patients or healthy controls. Bayesian inference analysis corroborated the diagnostic potential of such a combined PVTH score. Conclusion: We propose to assess PPT and VDT at the painful thigh and the pain-free hand. Combination in a PVTH score may allow a convenient lipedema diagnosis early during disease development.

Body mass index vs. waist-to-height-ratio in patients with lipohyperplasia dolorosa (vulgo lipedema).

BACKGROUND: Lipedema, also known as lipohyperplasia dolorosa (LiDo), is a painful condition affecting women, causing a disproportionate accumulation of subcutaneous adipose tissue in the extremities. It carries a lower risk of diabetes and cardio-metabolic dysfunctions compared to obesity, but coincident obesity can complicate diagnosis and treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 607 female LiDo patients, ≥ 18 years, stage 1-3, from Germany, the UK, and Spain. Data were collected as part of the standard initial assessment for LiDo patients. RESULTS: Based on waist-to-height-ratio (WHtR), 15.2% of patients were underweight, 45.5% normal weight, 22.1% overweight and 17.3% obese. There was a significant association between WHtR category and age group. Body mass index (BMI) is often overestimated, leading to misdiagnosis of obesity. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BMI also affects the recent decision of the German Federal Joint Committee on the reimbursement of liposuction costs by health insurance funds. Patients with BMI of more than 40 kg/m2 are excluded from cost coverage, and those with BMI between 35 kg/m2 and 40 kg/m2 must first receive conservative obesity therapy. In conclusion, the sole use of BMI in lipedema is unreliable and, in contrast to WHtR, leads to inaccurate diagnoses overestimating overweight and obesity.

[Lipohyperplasia dolorosa : About facts and fiction, clinical presentation and examination]. / Lipohyperplasia dolorosa : Über Fake und Fakten, Klinik und Untersuchung.

Lipohyperplasia dolorosa, also known by the misnomer "lipedema", is a clinical picture first described more than 80 years ago, that in the last 25 years has received increasing attention in medical practices, but also lymphological discussion circles which are otherwise rare in the scientific community. Unfortunately, to put it casually, discussions in social media accelerate the amount of supposed knowledge, an unusual occurrence in the otherwise slow and cautious field of science. Media influences and considerable economic interests resharpen and focus the view, but thus also cloud many women's view of the disease. Combining clinical presentation and a simple clinical examination with a few palpatory findings results in a clear diagnosis that excludes differential diagnoses, in particular obesity. Therapy should only be offered once a precise diagnosis is made. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, it is irreversible and means a lifelong change to the patient's quality of life. Care is, therefore, as always, the first duty of the diagnostician.

Lymphological Liposculpture for Secondary Lymphedema after Breast Cancer and Gynecological Tumors: Long-Term Results after 15 Years.

Background Untreated lymphedema of an extremity leads to an increase in volume. The therapy of this condition can be conservative or surgical. Methods "Lymphological liposculpture" is a two-part procedure consisting of resection and conservative follow-up treatment to achieve curative volume adjustment of the extremities in secondary lymphedema. This treatment significantly reduces the need for complex decongestive therapy (CDT). From 2005 to 2020, 3,184 patients with secondary lymphedema after breast cancer and gynecological tumors were treated in our practice and clinic. "Lymphological liposculpture" was applied to 65 patients, and the data were recorded and evaluated by means of perometry and questionnaires. Results The alignment of the sick to the healthy side was achieved in all patients. In 58.42% ( n = 38), the CDT treatment could be completely stopped postoperatively; in another 33.82% ( n = 22) of the patients, a permanent reduction of the CDT was achieved. In 7.69% ( n = 5) patients, the postoperative CDT could not be reduced. A total of 92.30% ( n = 60) of the patients described a lasting significant improvement in their quality of life. Conclusion "Lymphological liposculpture" is a standardized curative sustainable procedure for secondary lymphedema for volume adjustment of the extremities and reduction of postoperative CDT with eminent improvement of the quality of life.

Surgical lymphology. Therapy option for lymphoedema and lipohyperplasia dolorosa.

The typical therapy in lymphology is conservative. However, reconstructive and resective treatments for primary and secondary lymphoedema as well as resective procedures for lipohyperplasia dolorosa (LiDo) "lipedema" have been available for several decades. Each of these procedures has its clear indication and decades of successful history. These therapies represent a paradigm shift in lymphology. In reconstruction, the basic idea is to restore lymph flow, to bypass the obstacle to drainage in the vascular system. The combination procedures of two-stage application of resection and reconstruction in lymphoedema are just as much a "work in progress" as the concept of prophylactic lymphatic venous anastomosis (LVA). In the case of resective procedures, the focus is not only on improving the silhouette, but also on reducing the complex decongestion therapy (CDT) and - in the case of LiDo - freedom from pain by improving imaging procedures and the early use of surgical therapy options, the development of higher stages of lymphoedema should be a thing of the past. For LiDo, the application of surgical procedures avoids lifelong CDT and achieves painlessness. All surgical procedures, but especially the resection procedures, are now possible in a way that is gentle on the lymphatic vessels and should be offered to patients with lymphoedema or lipohyperplasia dolorosa without reservation if the goals - reduction in circumference, avoidance of lifelong CDT and, in the case of LiDo, painlessness - cannot be achieved by other means.

[Complications and their management in the surgical treatment of lipohyperplasia dolorosa]. / Komplikationen und deren Management bei der chirurgischen Behandlung der Lipohyperplasia dolorosa.

BACKGROUND: There are both conservative and surgical treatment options for lipohyperplasia dolorosa (LiDo). A procedure that has been established since 1997 is the surgical treatment through lymphological liposculpture according to Cornely™. AIM: After extensive suctioning of the extremities, an extensive subcutaneous wound cavity with a trabecular connective tissue scaffold remains. Nevertheless, surgery-related complications are rare. Postoperative management and administration of antibiotics and antithrombotics are reviewed. The therapies for complications are presented in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, the frequencies of adverse events in 1400 LiDo surgeries in 2020 were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 47.81 years (range 16-78 years). Symmetrically, 504 outer legs (outer half of the limb [BA]), 504 inner legs (inner half of the limb [BI]), and 392 arms [A] were surgically treated. RESULTS: Relevant adverse events rarely occurred: infections (1.79%), seromas (0.79%), erysipelas (0.28%), necrosis (0.14%) and deep vein thrombosis (0.07). DISCUSSION: We were able to reduce the rate of postoperative complications to 3.07% in the Lymphological Liposculpture™ regime for the surgical treatment of LiDo. In their meta-analysis on liposuction, Kanapathy et al. reported an overall incidence of major surgical complications of 3.48%. The overall incidence of minor surgical complications was 11.62%, with seroma (5.51%) being the most common minor complication [26]. Kruppa et al. report that the liposuction procedure including fat removal for esthetic reasons has a complication rate of 9.5%. Wound infections with 4.5% and the formation of erysipelas with 4% are clearly in the foreground [20].

Complications and their management in the surgical treatment of Lipohyperplasia dolorosa. English version.

BACKGROUND: There are both conservative and surgical treatment options for Lipohyperplasia dolorosa (LiDo). A procedure that has been established since 1997 is the surgical treatment through Lymphological Liposculpture according to Cornely™. AIM: After extensive suctioning of the extremities, an extensive subcutaneous wound cavity with a trabecular connective tissue scaffold remains. Nevertheless, surgery-related complications are rare. Postoperative management and administration of antibiotics and antithrombotics are reviewed. The therapies for complications are presented in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, the frequencies of adverse events in 1400 LiDo surgeries in 2020 were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 47.81 years (range 16-78 years). Symmetrically, 504 outer legs (outer half of the limb [BO]), 504 inner legs (inner half of the limb [BI]), and 392 arms [A] were surgically treated. RESULTS: Relevant adverse events rarely occurred: infections (1.79%), seromas (0.79%), erysipelas (0.28%), necrosis (0.14%) and deep vein thrombosis (0.07). DISCUSSION: We were able to reduce the rate of postoperative complications to 3.07% in the Lymphological Liposculpture™ regime for the surgical treatment of LiDo. In their meta-analysis on liposuction, Kanapathy et al. reported an overall incidence of major surgical complications of 3.35%. The overall incidence of minor surgical complications was 11.62%, with seroma (5.51%) being the most common minor complication [26]. Kruppa et al. report that the liposuction procedure including fat removal for esthetic reasons has a complication rate of 9.5%. Wound infections with 4.5% and the formation of erysipelas with 4% are clearly in the foreground [20].

Is subcutaneous adipose tissue expansion in people living with lipedema healthier and reflected by circulating parameters?

Lipedema may be considered a model for healthy expandability of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). This condition is characterized by the disproportional and symmetrical SAT accumulation in the lower-body parts and extremities, avoiding the abdominal area. There are no circulating biomarkers facilitating the diagnosis of lipedema. We tested the hypothesis that women living with lipedema present a distinct pattern of circulating parameters compared to age- and BMI-matched women. In 26 women (Age 48.3 ± 13.9 years, BMI 32.6 ± 5.8 kg/m2; lipedema group: n=13; control group: n=13), we assessed circulating parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, sex hormones and a proteomics panel. We find that women with lipedema have better glucose metabolism regulation represented by lower HbA1c (5.55 ± 0.62%) compared to controls (6.73 ± 0.85%; p<0.001); and higher adiponectin levels (lipedema: 4.69 ± 1.99 mmol/l; control: 3.28 ± 1.00 mmol/l; p=0.038). Despite normal glycemic parameters, women with lipedema have significantly higher levels of total cholesterol (5.84 ± 0.70 mmol/L vs 4.55 ± 0.77 mmol/L in control; p<0.001), LDL-C (3.38 ± 0.68 mmol/L vs 2.38 ± 0.66 mmol/L in control; p=0.002), as well as higher circulating inflammation (top 6 based on p-values: TNFSF14, CASP8, EN-RAGE, EIF4EBP1, ADA, MCP-1) and oxidative stress markers (malondialdehyde, superoxide dismutase and catalase). Our findings suggest that the expected association between activation of inflammatory and oxidative stress pathways and impaired glucose metabolism are counterbalanced by protective factors in lipedema.

Persistent lipedema pain in patients after bariatric surgery: a case series of 13 patients.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema often remains undiagnosed in patients with obesity, leading to mismanagement of treatment. Because of this, despite remarkable weight loss after bariatric surgery and decreases in hip and abdomen circumference, some patients show only small decreases in circumference of the extremities and report persistent limb pain. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work is to raise awareness of lipedema coincident with obesity, mistakenly diagnosed as obesity alone, in order to ensure the correct diagnosis of the condition and to achieve better treatment outcomes for people with lipedema and coincident obesity. SETTING: CG Lympha Clinic, Cologne, and Ernst von Bergmann Clinic, Potsdam. METHODS: From clinical records, we identified 13 patients who were diagnosed with lipedema only after undergoing bariatric surgery. We describe the course of their pain before and after bariatric surgery, focusing on the long-term progression of symptoms accompanying the disease. RESULTS: Lipedema cannot be cured by bariatric surgery, and although the patients in this study lost an average of more than 50 kg of weight, they displayed no improvement in the pain symptoms typical of lipedema. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the different etiologies of lipedema and obesity, lipedema requires its own specific treatment. Patients suffering from obesity should always be assessed for pain and lipedema. If coincident lipedema is diagnosed, we suggest that bariatric surgery only be performed first if diet and exercise have failed, the patient's body mass index is >40 kg/m2, and the patient has been informed of the possible persistence of pain. Lipedema, like a coincident disease, must be additionally treated conservatively or preferably surgically. This optimized treatment may help to better manage patient expectations after weight loss.

The Addition of Hyaluronidase to Tumescent Local Anesthesia Supports Lymphological Liposculpture of Secondary Lymphedema.

Proteoglycans (PG) are essential for regulating water flow in the interstitium. From stage 1 of lymphostasis, there is an accumulation of interstitial PG, which regulate the increasing fluids. As the disease progresses, more PG are formed than degraded, resulting in proliferation, and increases in circumference and volume of solid tissue. The removal of this subcutaneous tissue, which is very rigid due to cross-linked PG, is a particular challenge in lymphedema surgery. Hyaluronidase has a lytic effect on these PG structures and, after subcutaneous infiltration, reduces the viscosity of the extracellular matrix, promoting diffusion and penetration of solutions into the surrounding tissue. By using hyaluronidase in our vascular-sparing surgical protocol (lymphological liposculpture), we have not observed any lymphedema recurrences even after 15 years.

[Pain in lipoedema, fat in lipoedema and its consequences: results of a patient survey based on a pain questionnaire]. / Der Lipödemschmerz, seine Folgen auf die Lebensqualität betroffener Patientinnen ­ Ergebnisse einer Patientenbefragung mittels Schmerzfragebogen.

640 patients from a specialist clinic for operative lymphology were surveyed with the help by a questionnaire issued by the German Society of Pain Therapy (Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e. V.). This survey collected responses to questions about pain and pain characteristics as well as demographic data. It revealed that only a little more than 50 % of respondents were genuine cases of obesity. Lipoedema and obesity must therefore be regarded as clinical pictures unrelated to one another. The pain was mostly described as pressing and tearing in nature. Attributes such as throbbing or pulsing, consistent with acute inflammation, were rated as "not applicable". Symptoms were independent of the BMI, which is only useable to a limited extent in lipohyperplasia dolorosa. On the whole, the main symptom "pain" is multi-faceted. The study initiated by the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) must therefore be viewed critically. Congenital (as opposed to acquired) lipoedema fat on the extremities significantly impairs a person's ability to undertake activities in general as well as leisure activities. Since no objectively verifiable findings in lipoedema can be ascertained thus far, the diagnosis should be based on a careful patient survey.

S1 guidelines: Lipedema.

The present, revised guidelines on lipedema were developed under the auspices of and funded by the German Society of Phlebology (DGP). The recommendations are based on a systematic literature search and the consensus of eight medical societies and working groups. The guidelines contain recommendations with respect to diagnosis and management of lipedema. The diagnosis is established on the basis of medical history and clinical findings. Characteristically, there is a localized, symmetrical increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue in arms and legs that is in marked disproportion to the trunk. Other findings include edema, easy bruising, and increased tenderness. Further diagnostic tests are usually reserved for special cases that require additional workup. Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disorder marked by the individual variability and unpredictability of its clinical course. Treatment consists of four therapeutic mainstays that should be combined as necessary and address current clinical symptoms: complex physical therapy (manual lymphatic drainage, compression therapy, exercise therapy, and skin care), liposuction and plastic surgery, diet, and physical activity, as well as psychotherapy if necessary. Surgical procedures are indicated if - despite thorough conservative treatment - symptoms persist, or if there is progression of clinical findings and/or symptoms. If present, morbid obesity should be therapeutically addressed prior to liposuction.

S1-Leitlinie Lipödem.

Die vorliegende überarbeitete Leitlinie zum Lipödem wurde unter der Federführung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phlebologie (DGP) erstellt und finanziert. Die Inhalte beruhen auf einer systematischen Literaturrecherche und dem Konsens von acht medizinischen Fachgesellschaften und Berufsverbänden. Die Leitlinie beinhaltet Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Therapie des Lipödems. Die Diagnose ist dabei auf der Basis von Anamnese und klinischem Befund zu stellen. Charakteristisch ist eine umschriebene, symmetrisch lokalisierte Vermehrung des Unterhautfettgewebes an den Extremitäten mit deutlicher Disproportion zum Stamm. Zusätzlich finden sich Ödeme, Hämatomneigung und eine gesteigerte Schmerzhaftigkeit der betroffenen Körperabschnitte. Weitere apparative Untersuchungen sind bisher besonderen Fragestellungen vorbehalten. Die Erkrankung ist chronisch progredient mit individuell unterschiedlichem und nicht vorhersehbarem Verlauf. Die Therapie besteht aus vier Säulen, die individuell kombiniert und an das aktuelle Beschwerdebild angepasst werden sollten: komplexe physikalische Entstauungstherapie (manuelle Lymphdrainage, Kompressionstherapie, Bewegungstherapie, Hautpflege), Liposuktion und plastisch-chirurgische Interventionen, Ernährung und körperliche Aktivität sowie ggf. additive Psychotherapie. Operative Maßnahmen sind insbesondere dann angezeigt, wenn trotz konsequent durchgeführter konservativer Therapie noch Beschwerden bestehen bzw. eine Progredienz des Befundes und/oder der Beschwerden auftritt. Eine begleitend zum Lipödem bestehende morbide Adipositas sollte vor einer Liposuktion therapeutisch angegangen werden.