A Belgian Survey on Geriatric Assessment in Oncology Focusing on Large-Scale Implementation and Related Barriers and Facilitators.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe a large-scale, Belgian implementation project about geriatric assessment (=GA) in daily oncology practice and to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing GA in this setting. Design / setting / participants: The principal investigator of every participating hospital (n=22) was invited to complete a newly developed questionnaire with closed- and open-ended questions. The closed-ended questions surveyed how GA was implemented. The open-ended questions identified barriers and facilitators for the implementation of GA in daily oncology practice. Descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: Qualifying criteria (e.g. disease status and cancer type) for GA varied substantially between hospitals. Thirteen hospitals (59.1%) succeeded to screen more than half of eligible patients. Most hospitals reported that GA data and follow-up data had been collected in almost all screened patients. Implementing geriatric recommendations and formulating new geriatric recommendations at the time of follow-up are important opportunities for improvement. The majority of identified barriers were organizational, with high workload, lack of time or financial/staffing problems as most cited. The most cited facilitators were all related to collaboration. CONCLUSION: Interventions to improve the implementation of GA in older patients with cancer need to address a wide range of factors, with organization and collaboration as key elements. All stakeholders, seeking to improve the implementation of GA in older patients with cancer, should consider and address the identified barriers and facilitators.

Measurement and comparison of individual external doses of high-school students living in Japan, France, Poland and Belarus-the 'D-shuttle' project.

Twelve high schools in Japan (of which six are in Fukushima Prefecture), four in France, eight in Poland and two in Belarus cooperated in the measurement and comparison of individual external doses in 2014. In total 216 high-school students and teachers participated in the study. Each participant wore an electronic personal dosimeter 'D-shuttle' for two weeks, and kept a journal of his/her whereabouts and activities. The distributions of annual external doses estimated for each region overlap with each other, demonstrating that the personal external individual doses in locations where residence is currently allowed in Fukushima Prefecture and in Belarus are well within the range of estimated annual doses due to the terrestrial background radiation level of other regions/countries.

Relevance of a systematic geriatric screening and assessment in older patients with cancer: results of a prospective multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the large-scale feasibility and usefulness of geriatric screening and assessment in clinical oncology practice by assessing the impact on the detection of unknown geriatric problems, geriatric interventions and treatment decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients who had a malignant tumour were ≥70 years old and treatment decision had to be made. Patients were screened using G8; if abnormal (score ≤14/17) followed by Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). The assessment results were communicated to the treating physician using a predefined questionnaire to assess the topics mentioned above. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred and sixty-seven patients were included in 10 hospitals. Of these patients, 70.7% had an abnormal G8 score warranting a CGA. Physicians were aware of the assessment results at the time of treatment decision in two-thirds of the patients (n = 1115; 61.3%). The assessment detected unknown geriatric problems in 51.2% of patients. When the physician was aware of the assessment results at the time of decision making, geriatric interventions were planned in 286 patients (25.7%) and the treatment decision was influenced in 282 patients (25.3%). CONCLUSION: Geriatric screening and assessment in older patients with cancer is feasible at large scale and has a significant impact on the detection of unknown geriatric problems, leading to geriatric interventions and adapted treatment.

Predicting functional adverse outcomes in hospitalized older patients: a systematic review of screening tools.

BACKGROUND: Functional decline frequently occurs following hospitalisation in older people and may be prevented or minimized by specific management. Such care processes needs appropriate early screening of older hospitalized patients. OBJECTIVE: To identify instruments able to detect on admission older hospitalized patients at risk of functional decline at and after discharge. METHODS: Functional decline is defined as loss of independence in activities of daily living (functional decline) or admission in nursing home. The systematic search used Medline 1970-2007, Web of Science 1981-2007 and references list of relevant papers. An independent epidemiologist assessed methodological quality of the retained articles. RESULTS: We found 12 studies developing predictive tools, including 7145 patients. Functional outcomes were assessed at or after discharge. Preadmission functional status, cognition, and social support were major components for prediction of functional evolution. Few instruments are fully validated and data concerning reliability are often lacking. Operational characteristics are moderate (sensitivity 29-87%, negative likelihood ratio 0.2-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Instruments predicting functional adverse outcomes are difficult to compare due to heterogeneity of functional outcomes and hospital settings. The reason why so many tools have been developed is probably because none gives full satisfaction: their general predictive validity and performances are insufficient. Further research is needed to improve the screening of frail older patients admitted to hospital with standardized and validated tools.

Risk factors predicting later functional decline in older hospitalized patients.

With the demographic and epidemiological changes, an increasing number of older subjects are admitted to hospital. These patients are at increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including functional decline, increased length of stay, institutionalization, geriatric syndromes (e.g. delirium), hospital readmissions and death. Age, basic demographic data, diagnosis and comorbidities are not sufficient to estimate the risk of a further negative evolution of the frail older patient during and after hospitalization. As functional decline begins soon after admission, it is important to screen vulnerable patients early in order to plan appropriate orientation to geriatric programmes and to target interventions.This narrative review analyses which appropriate parameters, available soon after admission, may help to identify the older patients at risk of functional decline and to stratify their risk. Functional decline was defined here as loss of independence in basic care or admission in nursing home. The main risk factors identified by this analysis are functional status before or at admission, cognitive performance and social characteristics.These data may be easily and quickly collected by the nursing staff on admission, and further assessed by the geriatric liaison team, in order to optimize care management in frail older patients.

Peripheral parenteral nutrition in geriatric wards.

Poor nutritional status significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality in elderly. Malnutrition and denutrition are amenable to interventions aimed to improve outcomes in acute conditions so that nutritional support is frequently initiated during hospitalisation. If the enteral route remains the first evidence-based choice when the gut is functional, this approach may be difficult to perform in some "geriatric" situations like delirium, agitation, coma or pulmonary congestion. In the first days of the acute condition, when the patient is still stable, an alternative to the enteral route may also be considered. Although there is no evidence that parenteral nutrition is better than enteral nutrition, the peripheral intravenous route may be of interest especially when the enteral route is contraindicated. Moreover, the technique of peripheral parenteral nutition reduces central cannulation-related complications like pneumothorax. We emphasize here the place of this alternative method for a short duration nutritional support when supplement of caloric intake is needed. We discuss indications, a practical approach, our experience and analyze the evidences for this complementary nutritional support.