ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 2015 the Mayo Clinic Care Network (MCCN), in an effort to extend medical knowledge and share these best practices, embarked on an education mission to diffuse the clinical practice redesign involving the practice of colon and rectal surgery at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) to members of the MCCN. They elected to use a collaborative framework in an attempt to transfer knowledge to multiple teams in an efficient and supportive manner. METHODS: Eight MCCN members assembled a multidisciplinary team, which participated in both a didactic learning session delivered by frontline experts, as well as follow-up remote sessions regarding Mayo Clinic's enhanced recovery pathway for colon and rectal surgery. Teams departed the group session with established immediate next steps, communication plans, and an awareness of potential barriers and strategies for mitigation. Monthly coaching calls followed in an effort to help all teams meet their time line and overall goals. Finally, all participants met again after six months to report their clinical outcomes, as well their unique individual organization's successes and barriers encountered. RESULTS: Participating teams felt overwhelmingly that the collaborative program exceeded their expectations and equipped them with the tools to be successful. They also felt that the extended support provided by the Mayo Clinic team was essential, and the collaboration with other members markedly enhanced their experience. Importantly, all teams were able to successfully reduce length of stay, which was the desired main clinical outcome. DISCUSSION: The collaborative format was instrumental in the rapid diffusion and successful implementation of a transformative practice redesign involving colorectal surgical care of patients.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery/education , Colorectal Surgery/standards , Cooperative Behavior , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Staff Development/organization & administration , Clinical Competence , Communication , Critical Pathways/standards , Evidence-Based Practice , Humans , Length of Stay , Minnesota , Pain Management/methods , Patient Care Team/standards , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Quality Improvement/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transsphincteric fistulotomy is associated with a variable degree of fecal incontinence that is directly related to the thickness of the sphincter mechanism overlying the fistula. Staged fistulotomy with seton or the use of cutting seton designed to reduce the proportionate incontinence rates have failed to do so. This has resulted in attempts to find novel sphincter-sparing techniques in the past 2 decades including draining seton, fibrin sealant, anal fistula plug, dermal advancement, and endorectal advancement flaps. These operations have a variable success rates of 30% to 80% reported in the literature. OBJECTIVE: In 2007, Rojanasakul from Thailand demonstrated a novel technique, ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, and reported a 94% success rate in a small series. Since then, a few other small cohorts of patients have been reported in the literature with success rates varying from 57% to 82%. An institutional review board-approved study was proposed to measure our results and compare them with the published data. DESIGN: This study was undertaken to evaluate the success of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedures in a group of unselected transsphincteric fistulas deemed unsuitable for lay-open fistulotomy. SETTING: The procedure was performed in 3 different settings: a public institution, a major university hospital, and a large private hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 40 patients underwent 41 ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedures performed by 6 Board-certified colon and rectal surgeons. RESULTS: In a mean follow-up of 18 weeks, 74% of the patients achieved healing. In patients who underwent ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract as their primary procedure, the healing rate was 90%. The limitation of this study is its "case series" nature and the short mean follow-up period of 18 weeks. CONCLUSION: Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract has had excellent success in transsphincteric fistulas in multiple small series. A larger number of patients and longer follow-up period are needed to validate the early favorable results.
Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Suture Techniques , Adult , Aged , Fecal Incontinence/epidemiology , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ligation/methods , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Postoperative Complications , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
There is limited literature documenting granulocytic sarcoma of the colon. We report a case of a 28 year-old female with a colonic granulocystic sarcoma of the colon as a complication of AML, as it is an important consideration with surgical management of typhilitis.
