Endometrial cancer: predictors and oncological safety of tumor tissue manipulation.

PURPOSE: The main goal of this study is to assess the impact of tumor manipulation on the presence of lympho-vascular space invasion and its influence on oncological results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multi-centric study amongst patients who had received primary surgical treatment for apparently early-stage endometrial cancer. A multivariate statistical analysis model was designed to assess the impact that tumor manipulation (with the use of uterine manipulator or preoperative hysteroscopy) has on lympho-vascular development (LVSI) in the final surgical specimen. RESULTS: A total of 2852 women from 15 centers were included and divided into two groups based on the lympho-vascular status in the final surgical specimen: 2265 (79.4%) had no LVSI and 587 (20.6%) presented LVSI. The use of uterine manipulator was associated with higher chances of lympho-vascular involvement regardless of the type used: Balloon manipulator (HR: 95% CI 4.64 (2.99-7.33); p < 0.001) and No-Balloon manipulator ([HR]: 95% CI 2.54 (1.66-3.96); p < 0.001). There is no evidence of an association between the use of preoperative hysteroscopy and higher chances of lympho-vascular involvement (HR: 95% CI 0.90 (0.68-1.19); p = 0.479). CONCLUSION: Whilst performing common gynecological procedures, iatrogenic distention and manipulation of the uterine cavity are produced. Our study suggests that the use of uterine manipulator increases the rate of LVSI and, therefore, leads to poorer oncological results. Conversely, preoperative hysteroscopy does not show higher rates of LVSI involvement in the final surgical specimen and can be safely used.

Preoperative sampling in endometrial cancer: evaluation of the histopathological agreement with definitive surgical specimen.

PURPOSE: The main goal of this study is to assess the diagnostic agreement between preoperative biopsy and definitive histology of the surgical specimen to determine which sampling method is most suitable for diagnosis of early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentric study to assess the correlation between three endometrial sampling methods (hysteroscopy, pipelle and D&C) in patients who had undergone preoperative endometrial biopsy and received primary surgical treatment for endometrial cancer. The primary objective was the agreement rate between hysteroscopy (HSC), endometrial biopsy (pipelle) and dilatation and curettage (D&C). RESULTS: A total of 1833 women who underwent preoperative sampling at 15 centers were included: 1042 biopsies were performed by HSC, 703 by pipelle and 88 by D&C. All three methods presented a moderate diagnostic concordance (κ = 0.40-0.61) with the definitive specimen's histology: HSC (κ = 0.47), pipelle sampling (κ = 0.48) and D&C (κ = 0.48). Likewise, a subgroup analysis was performed by histological subtype comparing HSC and endometrial biopsy, showing that neither is superior as a diagnostic method. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, the use of pipelle sampling could become an adequate diagnostic method in endometrial cancer due to its similar agreement to HSC, ease of use and affordability.

Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy on moderate- and high-risk stage I and II epithelian ovarian cancer patients. Long-term single institution experience and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Although the optimal management of women with FIGO stages I and II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is still controversial, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is the mainstay of treatment. Suboptimal survival results have led to major efforts to identify prognostic factors, improve surgical staging and develop adjuvant therapies to improve patients' outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluate in a retrospective study clinical efficacy and the toxicity profile of a platinum-based adjuvant CT in FIGO stages I and II EOC treated at our institution from March 1984 to December 2006. Grade I FIGO stages IA-IB were excluded from the analysis. In the first period (1984-1997), patients received a platinum-based regimen without taxanes. In the second period from 1997 onwards, patients were treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Four to six cycles of adjuvant CT were administered. Potential predictive factors of efficacy and the role of paclitaxel addition were also analysed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients (60 treated with paclitaxel) met inclusion criteria and were evaluable. Median age at diagnosis was 53.7 years (range 19-81) and most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (ECOG) of 0-1 (91.8%); 82.9% patients had pathological stage I and 17.1% pathological stage II. With a median follow up of 8.34 years (range 4.4-11.6), 103 patients (74.1%) were free of disease and 110 of them were alive (79.1%). Median relapse-free survival (RFS) and median overall survival (OS) had not been reached at the time of the analysis. No survival difference was found between paclitaxel and carboplatin combination or non-paclitaxel-containing regimens. Statistically significant prognostic factors for better RFS in the multivariate analysis were: ECOG 0 (p=0.023; HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17-0.57); FIGO I stage (p<0.001; HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.15-0.58); I-II histological grade (p=0.005; HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.19-0.75); mucinous histology (p=0.013; HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.53); non-surgical adherences (p<0.002, HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15-0.54); paracolic gutters inspection (p=0.033; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.26-0.95) and liver surface biopsies (p=0.048; HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.41-0.98).Toxicity was generally mild and non-haematologic events were the most commonly found (62.9% of the total). The most frequent haematologic toxicities were neutropenia (41.7% in all grades, 9.5% grade 3-4) and anaemia (29.1% in all grades, 3.2% grade 3-4). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome of this series is comparable to the published evidence and reflects the limited activity of platinum-based CT in the adjuvant setting. The potential survival advantage of the addition of paclitaxel to carboplatin cannot be definitively answered due to the small number of patients, the limited follow-up and the retrospective nature of the study. More effective and specific treatments are clearly required, in particular for those patients with stage II and undifferentiated tumours. Quality of surgery entails prognostic value.