ABSTRACT
Literature concerning patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) treatment response and patient report outcomes (PROs) -such as QoL or disability- in Argentina is scarce. In the scope of the Treatment-Resistant Depression in America Latina (TRAL) study which previous results highlighted the burden of TRD compared to non-TRD patients as well as essential epidemiological data in the region, this paper reports on the outcomes of Standard-of-Care (SOC) over a 1-year follow-up of TRD patients in the subsample for Argentina. From a sample of 220 MDD patients identified in 5 sites in Argentina, 72 patients were diagnosed with TRD. Exclusion criteria included patients with psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, with severe chemical dependence or currently participating in another clinical trial. MADRS, PHQ-9 and PROs (EQ-5D and SDS) were used as outcomes. Patients' mean age was 54.7 years and 70.3% of the patients were female. Around 61% of the patients achieved a response (reduction of MADRS score ≥ 50%), but over 33% did not achieve a remission (MADRS total score ≤12). Almost 67% of the patients still felt anxious/depressed at the end of the study (EQ-5D), while disruption affected patients in diverse areas -71% in work/school, 69.7% in social life/leisure and 66.6% in their family life/personal responsibilities. The burden of TRD is significant in Argentina, and more effort should be put in the implementation of treatment protocols with better outcomes.
La literatura disponible en relación a la respuesta al tratamiento de los pacientes con Depresión Resistente al Tratamiento (TRD) y los resultados del informe del paciente (PRO) -como la calidad de vida o la discapacidad- es escasa en Argentina. A partir de la submuestra de Argentina del estudio de depresión resistente al tratamiento en América Latina (TRAL), cuyos resultados anteriores destacaron la carga de TRD en comparación con los pacientes sin DRT, así como datos epidemiológicos esenciales en la región, este documento informa sobre los resultados del estándar de atención (Standard-of-Care, SOC) durante un seguimiento de 1 año de pacientes con DRT De una muestra de 220 pacientes con TDM de 5 centros de Argentina, 72 pacientes fueron diagnosticados con DRT. El criterio de exclusión excluyó a los pacientes con psicosis, esquizofrenia, trastorno bipolar, trastorno esquizoafectivo, demencia, dependencia química grave o que estaban participando en otro ensayo clínico. La MADRS, el PHQ-9 y los PRO (EQ-5D y SDS) se utilizaron como resultados. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 54,7 años y el 70,3 % de los pacientes eran mujeres. Alrededor del 61 % de los pacientes lograron una respuesta (reducción del ≥50 % en el puntaje total de MADRS), pero más del 33 % no logró una remisión (puntuación total MADRS ≤12). Casi el 67 % de los pacientes seguían sintiéndose ansiosos/ deprimidos al final del estudio (EQ-5D), mientras que dicho trastorno afectó a los pacientes en diversas áreas: el 71 % en el trabajo/la escuela, el 69,7 % en la vida social/el tiempo libre y el 66,6 % en su vida familiar/las responsabilidades personales. La carga de la DRT es significativa en Argentina, y se debe hacer más esfuerzo en la implementación de protocolos de tratamiento con mejores resultados.
Subject(s)
Depression , Argentina , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is one of the most pressing issues in mental healthcare in LatAm. However, clinical data and outcomes of standard of care (SOC) are scarce. The present study reported on the Treatment-Resistant Depression in America Latina (TRAL) project 1-year follow-up of patients under SOC assessing clinical presentation and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 420 patients with clinical diagnoses of TRD from Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico were included in a 1-year follow-up to assess clinical outcomes of depression (MADRS) and suicidality (C-SSRS), as well as evolution of clinical symptoms of depression. Patients were assessed every 3 months and longitudinal comparison was performed based on change from baseline to each visit and end of study (12 months). Socio demographic characterization was also performed. RESULTS: Most patients were female (80.9%), married (42.5%) or single (34.4%), with at least 10 years of formal education (71%). MDD diagnosis was set at 37.29 (SD=14.00) years, and MDD duration was 11.11 years (SD=10.34). After 1-year of SOC, 79.1% of the patients were still symptomatic, and 40% of the patients displayed moderate/severe depression. Only 44.1% of the patients achieved a response (≥50% improvement in MADRS), and 60% of the sample failed to achieve remission. Suicidal ideation was reported by more than half of the patients at the end of study. CONCLUSIONS: Depression and suicidality symptoms after a 1-year of SOC is of great concern. Better therapeutic options are needed to tackle this debilitating and burdensome disease.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant , Suicide , Humans , Female , Male , Suicidal Ideation , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Depression/epidemiology , Latin America/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/diagnosis , Standard of CareABSTRACT
Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) prevalence varies considerable between regions and epidemiology of TRD in Argentina is lacking. Based on the Treatment-Resistant Depression in America Latina (TRAL) study, epidemiology and burden of TRD in MDD patients from Argentina is reported in this paper. A sample of adult MDD patients (n=396) from 5 sites in Argentina, with clinical diagnosis were included. Patients with psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, with severe chemical dependence or currently participating in another clinical trial were excluded. Patient reported outcomes and clinical assessment scales were used as outcomes. The prevalence of TRD in MDD patients in Argentina is 33.2%, based on TRAL data. Patients in TRD are older compared to those without TRD, and was more evident in married/consensual union MDD patients. Higher suicidality, greater comorbidity based on MINI, and worse scores in MADRS and PHQ-9 were identified in TRD patients. The prevalence identified in TRAL study for Argentina is substantial comparing with other Latin American countries and worldwide prevalence. TRD represents a disproportional burden to society, and efforts should be placed on reducing the burden of MDD and TRD in Argentina by improving early diagnosis, therapeutic management and ensuring that all patients have better access to mental healthcare.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Adult , Argentina/epidemiology , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Humans , Latin America/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The objective of this international, 8-week, randomized, double-blind study was to show the superiority of the antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine, the first MT1/MT2 receptor agonist and 5-HT2C receptor antagonist antidepressant, versus fluoxetine in outpatients fulfilling Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-volume IV-TR criteria for major depressive disorder of severe intensity, defined by a baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) total score of at least 25 and CGI severity of illness score of at least 4. Patients received agomelatine 25-50 mg/day (n=252) or fluoxetine 20-40 mg/day (n=263) for 8 weeks. The main efficacy outcome measure was HAM-D17 total score (change from baseline to last post-baseline assessment). Secondary outcome measures were Clinical Global Impressions-improvement (CGI), severity (CGI-S), anxiety (HAM-A), and sleep (HAM-D sleep items) scores. The mean decrease in HAM-D17 total score over 8 weeks was significantly greater with agomelatine than fluoxetine with a between-group difference of 1.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.20-2.77; P=0.024). The percentage of responders at last post-baseline assessment was higher with agomelatine on both HAM-D17 (decrease in total score from baseline ≥50%; 71.7% agomelatine vs. 63.8% fluoxetine; P=0.060) and CGI-improvement (score 1 or 2; 77.7 vs. 68.8%; P=0.023). There was a significant between-group difference of 0.37 (95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.68) in HAM-D sleep subscore in favor of agomelatine (P=0.018). Similar improvements were observed on HAM-A with agomelatine and fluoxetine. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, in this study, agomelatine showed superior antidepressant efficacy over fluoxetine in treating patients with a severe episode of major depressive disorder after 8 weeks of treatment with a good tolerability profile.
